<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">glaucoma</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Национальный журнал Глаукома</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>National Journal glaucoma</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2078-4104</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2311-6862</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases”</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">glaucoma-362</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLES</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Обоснование раннего удаления хрусталика в лечении заболевания первичного закрытия угла передней камеры</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Rationale for early lens extraction in the treatment of primary angle closure disease</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-6671</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Курышева</surname><given-names>Наталия Ивановна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kurysheva</surname><given-names>Natalia</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., профессор, заведующая кафедрой глазных болезней1,</p><p>руководитель консультативно-диагностического отдела2;</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Doc. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Ophthalmology Department1,</p><p>Head of the Consultative and Diagnostic Department2;</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">e-natalia@list.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7163-4858</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шарова</surname><given-names>Галина Аркадьевна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Sharova</surname><given-names>Galina</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>заведующая диагностическим офтальмологическим отделением, лазерный хирур</p><p>SPIN-РИНЦ 7067-0326</p><p> </p><p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Head of the Diagnostic Ophthalmology Department, laser surgeon</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">galina.shar@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4302-1982</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Некрасова</surname><given-names>Екатерина Юрьевна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Nekrasova</surname><given-names>Ekaterina</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>клинический ординатор</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>clinical resident1,2</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">catherine.nekrasova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-3"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>1.Медико‐биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федеральный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России, 123098, Российская Федерация, Москва, ул. Живописная, д. 46, корп. 8;&#13;
2. Консультативно-диагностический отдел Центра офтальмологии ФМБА России, ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «ФМБЦ им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА, 123098, Российская Федерация, Москва, ул. Гамалеи, 15;</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>1. The Department of Eye Diseases at the Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the Federal Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan, Zhivopisnaya str. 46, building 8, Moscow, Russian Federation, 123098;&#13;
2. Diagnostic Department of the Ophthalmological Center of Federal Medical‐Biological Agency of Russia, Gamalei str. 15, Moscow, Russian Federation, 123098;</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ООО "Глазная клиника доктора Беликовой"</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Ophthalmology Clinic of Dr. Belikova, 26/2, Budenny Avenue, Moscow, Russian Federation, 105118;</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-3"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>1.Медико‐биологический университет инноваций и непрерывного образования ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «Федеральный биофизический центр им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА России, 123098, Российская Федерация, Москва, ул. Живописная, д. 46, корп. 8;&#13;
2. Консультативно-диагностический отдел Центра офтальмологии ФМБА России, ФГБУ ГНЦ РФ «ФМБЦ им. А.И. Бурназяна» ФМБА, 123098, Российская Федерация, Москва, ул. Гамалеи, 15;</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>1.The Department of Eye Diseases at the Medical Biological University of Innovations and Continuing Education of the Federal Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan, Zhivopisnaya str. 46, building 8, Moscow, Russian Federation, 123098;&#13;
2. Diagnostic Department of the Ophthalmological Center of Federal Medical‐Biological Agency of Russia, Gamalei str. 15, Moscow, Russian Federation, 123098;</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>18</day><month>04</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><elocation-id>362</elocation-id><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А., Некрасова Е.Ю., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А., Некрасова Е.Ю.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N., Sharova G., Nekrasova E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/362">https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/362</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>ЦЕЛЬ</title><p>ЦЕЛЬ. Продемонстрировать целесообразность раннего удаления хрусталика в лечении заболевания первичного закрытия угла в клинической практике.</p></sec><sec><title>МАТЕРИАЛ И МЕТОДЫ</title><p>МАТЕРИАЛ И МЕТОДЫ. Представлены три клинических случая на разных стадиях заболевания первичного закрытия угла (ЗПЗУ). Первый связан развитием двухстороннего приступа первичного закрытия угла (ПЗУ) в отделении интенсивной терапии на фоне лечения острого респираторного дистресс-синдрома (ОРСД), связанного с пневмонией COVID-19, у пациентки с ранее не диагностированным ЗПЗУ. Второй случай демонстрирует прогрессирование глаукомной оптической нейропатии (ГОН) при начальной первичной закрытоугольной глаукоме (ПЗУГ) после периферической лазерной иридотомии (ПЛИТ) и отсроченной селективной лазерной трабекулопластики (СЛТ) на фоне увеличения толщины хрусталика. Третий пример иллюстрирует прогрессирование далекозашедшей ПЗУГ на правом глазу (OD) и развитой ПЗУГ на левом (OS), которое было обусловлено формированием гониосинехий после билатеральной ПЛИТ, что потребовало выполнения диодной транссклеральнной циклофотокоагуляции (ДТЦК) на OD и синустрабекулэктомии (СТЭК) на OS. В дальнейшем выполнена билатеральная факоэмульсификация катаракты с имплантацией интраокулярной линзы (ФЭ+ИОЛ) и СЛТ.</p></sec><sec><title>РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ</title><p>РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ. В первом клиническом случае в течение 2-х месяцев развилась далекозашедшая ПЗУГ на обоих глазах. После двухсторонней ПЛИТ, СТЭК достигнута компенсация внутриглазного давления (ВГД), зрительные функции остались прежними. Во втором клиническом случае через 5,5 лет после ПЛИТ и СЛТ выявлено увеличение толщины хрусталика (OD на 0,2 мм, OS 0,48 мм). На OD ГОН стабильна (скорость истончения слоя нервных волокон сетчатки 0,94 мкм/год, p=0,32, на OS скорость прогрессирования составила -1,04 мкм/год, p=0,018. Учитывая хрусталиковый механизм прогрессирования ЗПЗУ, рекомендована билатеральная ФЭ+ИОЛ. В третьем клиническом примере ВГД оставалось повышенным после билатеральной ПЛИТ, ДТЦК на OD и СТЭК на OS в результате гониосинехиообразования, а потому ФЭ+ИОЛ также не привела к его снижению. После двухсторонней СЛТ достигнута компенсация ВГД без местной гипотензивной терапии (ВГД по данным Icare на OD 18,0 мм рт.ст., OS 15 мм рт.ст.).</p></sec><sec><title>ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ</title><p>ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЕ. Для сохранения зрительных функций в лечении ЗПЗУ необходимо проводить ФЭ+ИОЛ в самом начале заболевания до формирования ГОН и гониосинехий. Это продиктовано доминирующей ролью хрусталика в формировании ЗПЗУ в описанных клинических примерах.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>PURPOSE</title><p>PURPOSE. To demonstrate the feasibility of early lens extraction in the treatment of primary angle closure disease in clinical practice.</p></sec><sec><title>MATERIAL AND METHODS</title><p>MATERIAL AND METHODS. Three clinical cases are presented at different stages of primary angle closure disease (PACD). The first one is related to the development of a bilateral acute attack of primary angle closure (PAC) in the intensive care unit during the treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) associated with COVID-19 pneumonia in a patient with a previously undiagnosed PACD. The second case demonstrates the progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) in early primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and delayed selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) against the background of increased lens thickness. The third example illustrates the progression of advanced PACG in the right eye (OD) and moderate PACG in the left eye (OS), which was due to the formation of goniosynechia after bilateral LPI, which required transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation (TSCP) in OD and trabeculectomy in OS. Subsequently, bilateral lens extraction with implantation of an intraocular lens (LE+IOL) and SLT was performed.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS</title><p>RESULTS. In the first clinical case, advanced PACG developed in both eyes within 2 months. After bilateral LPI, trabeculectomy, compensation of intraocular pressure (IOP) was achieved, visual functions remained the same. In the second clinical case, 5.5 years after LPI and SLT, an increase in the thickness of the lens was revealed (OD by 0.2 mm, OS 0.48 mm). GON did not progress in OD (the rate of thinning of the retinal nerve fiber layer was 0.94 µm/year, p=0.32 and the progression rate in OS was -1.04 µm/year (p=0.018). Taking into account the lens mechanism of the progression of PACD, bilateral LE+IOL was recommended. In the third clinical example IOP remained elevated after bilateral LPI, TSCP in OD and trabeculectomy in OS as a result of goniosinechiogenesis, and therefore LE+IOL also did not lead to its decrease. After bilateral SLT, compensation of IOP was achieved without local hypotensive therapy (IOP, Icare: OD 18.0 mm Hg, OS 15 mm Hg).</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSION</title><p>CONCLUSION. For preserving visual functions LE+IOL is highly recommended at the very beginning of PACD in order to prevent the formation of GON and goniosynechia. This is dictated by the dominant role of the lens mechanism in the PACD formation as it is demonstrated in the described clinical examples.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>заболевание первичного закрытия угла</kwd><kwd>прогрессирование заболевания первичного закрытия угла</kwd><kwd>ранее удаление хрусталика</kwd><kwd>острый приступ первичного закрытия угла.</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>primary angle closure disease</kwd><kwd>progression of a primary angle closure disease</kwd><kwd>early lens extraction</kwd><kwd>acute attack of primary angle closure.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):238-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.8и.2.238</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">. Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys.  Br J Ophthalmol.  2002 Feb;86(2):238-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.8и.2.238</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А. Роль оптической когерентной томографии в диагностике заболеваний закрытого угла передней камеры. Часть 1: Визуализация переднего сегмента глаза. Офтальмология. 2021;18(2):208–215. https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-208-215</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Diagnosis of Angle Closed Diseases of the Anterior Chamber. Part 1: Visualization of the Anterior Segment of the Eye. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(2):208–215. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-2-208-215</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Quigley HA. Long-term follow-up of laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(3):218-224. https://doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(81)35038-6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Quigley HA. Long-term follow-up of laser iridotomy. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(3):218-224. https://doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(81)35038-6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gupta B, Angmo D, Yadav S, Dada T, Gupta V, Sihota R. Quantification of Iridotrabecular Contact in Primary Angle-Closure Disease. J Glaucoma. 2020 Aug;29(8):681–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001572</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gupta B, Angmo D, Yadav S, Dada T, Gupta V, Sihota R. Quantification of Iridotrabecular Contact in Primary Angle-Closure Disease. J Glaucoma. 2020 Aug;29(8):681–688. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001572</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurysheva NI, Lepeshkina LV, Shatalova EO. Predictors of Outcome in Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: A Long-term Observation Study in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Compared With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):880-886. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001048</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Lepeshkina LV, Shatalova EO. Predictors of Outcome in Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: A Long-term Observation Study in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy Compared With Primary Open-angle Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2018;27(10):880-886. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001048</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А. Сравнительное исследование ретинальной микроциркуляции при заболевании первичного закрытого угла и начальной первичной открытоугольной глаукоме. Вестник офтальмологии. 2022;138(1):44-51. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202213801144</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Sharova GA. Comparative study of retinal microcirculation in primary angle closure disease and early primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2022;138(1):44-51. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1389-1397. https://doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30956-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma202213801144</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nongpiur ME, Sakata LM, Friedman DS, et al. Novel association of smaller anterior chamber width with angle closure in Singaporeans. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(10):1967-1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Azuara-Blanco A, Burr J, Ramsay C, et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10052):1389-1397. https://doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30956-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Марченко А. Н., Сорокин Е. Л., Пашенцев Я. Е. Эффективность системы прогнозирования риска развития острого приступа закрытоугольной глаукомы. Вестник офтальмологии. 2019;135(1):47-52. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913501147</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nongpiur ME, Sakata LM, Friedman DS, et al. Novel association of smaller anterior chamber width with angle closure in Singaporeans. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(10):1967-1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.007</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ghelichkhani P, Esmaeili M. Prone Position in Management of COVID-19 Patients; a Commentary. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1):e48. Published 2020 Apr 11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marchenko AN, Sorokin EL, Pashentcev YaE. Effectiveness of the system for predicting the risk of developing an acute angle closure glaucoma attack. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2019;135(1):47-52 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma201913501147</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И. Covid-19 и поражения органа зрения: Монография. – М.: Издательство ЛАРГО, 2021. – 80 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ghelichkhani P, Esmaeili M. Prone Position in Management of COVID-19 Patients; a Commentary. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020;8(1):e48. Published 2020 Apr 11.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sanghi P, Malik M, Hossain IT, Manzouri B. Ocular Complications in the Prone Position in the Critical Care Setting: The COVID-19 Pandemic. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36(3):361-372. https://doi:10.1177/0885066620959031</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI. Covid-19 i porazheniya organa zreniya: Monografiya. – M.: Izdatel’stvo LARGO, 2021. – 80 s.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sano R, Kurokawa T, Kurimoto Y, Miyazawa D, Yoshimura N. Comparison between the anterior chamber configuration in the supine position and that in the prone position in patients with narrow angle. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2001;105(6):388-393.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sanghi P, Malik M, Hossain IT, Manzouri B. Ocular Complications in the Prone Position in the Critical Care Setting: The COVID-19 Pandemic. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36(3):361-372. https://doi:10.1177/0885066620959031</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim TW, Park KH, Hong C. Dark-room prone-position test for intermittent angle closure. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007;21(3):151-154. https://doi:10.3341/kjo.2007.21.3.151</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sano R, Kurokawa T, Kurimoto Y, Miyazawa D, Yoshimura N. Comparison between the anterior chamber configuration in the supine position and that in the prone position in patients with narrow angle. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2001;105(6):388-393.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yamada R, Hirose F, Matsuki T, Kameda T, Kurimoto Y. Comparison of Mydriatic Provocative and Dark Room Prone Provocative Tests for Anterior Chamber Angle Configuration. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(6):482-486. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000310</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim TW, Park KH, Hong C. Dark-room prone-position test for intermittent angle closure. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2007;21(3):151-154. https://doi:10.3341/kjo.2007.21.3.151</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Anderson AP, Babu G, Swan JG, et al. Ocular changes over 60 min in supine and prone postures. J Appl Physiol. (1985). 2017;123(2):415-423. https://doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2016</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yamada R, Hirose F, Matsuki T, Kameda T, Kurimoto Y. Comparison of Mydriatic Provocative and Dark Room Prone Provocative Tests for Anterior Chamber Angle Configuration. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(6):482-486. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000310</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harris LS, Galin MA. Prone provocative testing for narrow angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;87(5):493-496. https://doi:10.1001/archopht.1972.01000020495001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson AP, Babu G, Swan JG, et al. Ocular changes over 60 min in supine and prone postures. J Appl Physiol.  (1985). 2017;123(2):415-423. https://doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2016</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Остроумова О.Д., Ших Е.В., Реброва Е.В., Рязанова А.Ю., Мошетова Л.К. Лекарственно-индуцированная глаукома. Вестник офтальмологии. 2020;136(2):107-116. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136021107</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harris LS, Galin MA. Prone provocative testing for narrow angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1972;87(5):493-496. https://doi:10.1001/archopht.1972.01000020495001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Шарова Г.А. Роль оптической когерентной томографии в диагностике заболеваний закрытого угла передней камеры. Часть 2: Визуализация заднего сегмента глаза. Офтальмология.2021;18(3):381–388. https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-3-381-388</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ostroumova OD, Shikh EV, Rebrova EV, Ryazanova Ayu, Moshetova LK. Drug-induced glaucoma. Vestnik Oftalmologii. 2020;136(2):107-116. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nerlikar RR, Palsule AC, Vadke S. Bilateral Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma After Prone Position Ventilation for COVID-19 Pneumonia. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(8):e364-e366. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001864</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136021107</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barosco G, Morbio R, Chemello F, Tosi R, Marchini G. Bilateral angle-closure during hospitalization for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): A case report [published online ahead of print, 2021 Apr 22]. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;11206721211012197. https://doi:10.1177/11206721211012197</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Sharova G.A. The Role of Optical Coherence Tomography in the Diagnosis of Angle Closed Diseases of the Anterior Chamber. Part 2: Visualization of the Posterior Segment of the Eye. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2021;18(3):381–388. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-3-381-388</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tanaka H.G. The Asymptomatic PAC Suspect: LPI or No LPI? Review ophthalmology. 2018; September. No Pagination Specified.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nerlikar RR, Palsule AC, Vadke S. Bilateral Acute Angle Closure Glaucoma After Prone Position Ventilation for COVID-19 Pneumonia. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(8):e364-e366. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001864</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">He M., Jiang Y., Huang S., Chang D.S., Munoz B., Aung T., Foster P.J., Friedman D.S. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, Randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; Apr., 20;393(10181):1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32607-2</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barosco G, Morbio R, Chemello F, Tosi R, Marchini G. Bilateral angle-closure during hospitalization for coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19): A case report [published online ahead of print, 2021 Apr 22]. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;11206721211012197. https://doi:10.1177/11206721211012197</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Лепешкина Л.В., Шаталова Е.О. Эффективность селективной лазерной трабекулопластики у больных с первичной закрытоугольной глаукомой после периферической лазерной иридотомии в отдаленном периоде. Офтальмохирургия. 2018;(3):33-40. https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2018-3-33-40</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanaka H.G. The Asymptomatic PAC Suspect: LPI or No LPI? Review ophthalmology. 2018; September. No Pagination Specified.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Raj S, Tigari B, Faisal TT, et al. Correction: Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary angle closure disease. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(3):1028. https://doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1047-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">He M., Jiang Y., Huang S., Chang D.S., Munoz B., Aung T., Foster P.J., Friedman D.S. Laser peripheral iridotomy for the prevention of angle closure: a single-centre, Randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2019; Apr., 20;393(10181):1609–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32607-2</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurysheva NI, Maslova EV, Zolnikova IV, Fomin AV, Lagutin MB. A comparative study of structural, functional and circulatory parameters in glaucoma diagnostics. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201599. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201599</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva N.I., Lepeshkina L.V., Shatalova E.O. Efficacy of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma after peripheral iridotomy: a long-term follow-up. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery. 2018;(3):33-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2018-3-33-40</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurysheva NI, Lepeshkina LV. Detection of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(5):410-420. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001829</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Raj S, Tigari B, Faisal TT, et al. Correction: Efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary angle closure disease. Eye (Lond). 2021;35(3):1028. https://doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1047-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jiang Y, Chang DS, Zhu H, et al. Longitudinal changes of angle configuration in primary angle-closure suspects: the Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention Trial. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(9):1699-1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.039</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Maslova EV, Zolnikova IV, Fomin AV, Lagutin MB. A comparative study of structural, functional and circulatory parameters in glaucoma diagnostics. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0201599. https://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201599</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lee KS, Sung KR, Kang SY, Cho JW, Kim DY, Kook MS. Residual anterior chamber angle closure in narrow-angle eyes following laser peripheral iridotomy: anterior segment optical coherence tomography quantitative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 011 May;55(3):213-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-011-0009-3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Lepeshkina LV. Detection of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(5):410-420. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001829</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shao T, Hong J, Xu J, Le Q, Wang J, Qian S. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment by Anterior-segment Optical Coherence Tomography After Phacoemulsification With or Without Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(9):647-655. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000061</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jiang Y, Chang DS, Zhu H, et al. Longitudinal changes of angle configuration in primary angle-closure suspects: the Zhongshan Angle-Closure Prevention Trial. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(9):1699-1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.03.039</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ghadamzadeh M, Karimi F, Ghasemi Moghaddam S, Daneshvar R. Anterior Chamber Angle Changes in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma Following Phacoemulsification Versus Phacotrabeculectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Glaucoma. 2022;31(3):147-155. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001977</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lee KS, Sung KR, Kang SY, Cho JW, Kim DY, Kook MS. Residual anterior chamber angle closure in narrow-angle eyes following laser peripheral iridotomy: anterior segment optical coherence tomography quantitative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 011 May;55(3):213-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-011-0009-3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Song MK, Sung KR, Shin JW, Jo YH, Won HJ. Glaucomatous Progression After Lens Extraction in Primary Angle Closure Disease Spectrum. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):711-717. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001537</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shao T, Hong J, Xu J, Le Q, Wang J, Qian S. Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment by Anterior-segment Optical Coherence Tomography After Phacoemulsification With or Without Goniosynechialysis in Patients With Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2015;24(9):647-655. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000061</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sihota R, Goyal A, Kaur J, Gupta V, Nag TC. Scanning electron microscopy of the trabecular meshwork: understanding the pathogenesis of primary angle closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(3):183-188. https://doi:10.4103/0301-4738.95868</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ghadamzadeh M, Karimi F, Ghasemi Moghaddam S, Daneshvar R. Anterior Chamber Angle Changes in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma Following Phacoemulsification Versus Phacotrabeculectomy: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Glaucoma. 2022;31(3):147-155. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001977</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курышева Н.И., Рыжков П.К., Топольник Е.В., Капкова С.Г. Состояние эндотелия роговицы после селективной лазерной трабекулопластики. Глаукома. 2012;2:36-41</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Song MK, Sung KR, Shin JW, Jo YH, Won HJ. Glaucomatous Progression After Lens Extraction in Primary Angle Closure Disease Spectrum. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(8):711-717. https://doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001537</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chan PP, Tang FY, Leung DY, Lam TC, Baig N, Tham CC. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Acute Primary Angle Closure Randomized to Receive Early Phacoemulsification Versus Laser Peripheral Iridotomy. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(4):332–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001799</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sihota R, Goyal A, Kaur J, Gupta V, Nag TC. Scanning electron microscopy of the trabecular meshwork: understanding the pathogenesis of primary angle closure glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60(3):183-188. https://doi:10.4103/0301-4738.95868</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurysheva NI, Ryzhkov PK, Topolnik EV, Kapkova SG. Corneal endothelium after selective laser trabeculoplasty. Glaukoma. 2012;(2):38-43. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurysheva NI, Ryzhkov PK, Topolnik EV, Kapkova SG. Corneal endothelium after selective laser trabeculoplasty. Glaukoma. 2012;(2):38-43. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chan PP, Tang FY, Leung DY, Lam TC, Baig N, Tham CC. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Acute Primary Angle Closure Randomized to Receive Early Phacoemulsification Versus Laser Peripheral Iridotomy. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(4):332–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001799</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chan PP, Tang FY, Leung DY, Lam TC, Baig N, Tham CC. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes of Acute Primary Angle Closure Randomized to Receive Early Phacoemulsification Versus Laser Peripheral Iridotomy. J Glaucoma. 2021;30(4):332–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001799</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
