glaucomaНациональный журнал ГлаукомаNational Journal glaucoma2078-41042311-6862Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases”10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-4-99-111glaucoma-494Research ArticleОБЗОРЫ ЛИТЕРАТУРЫLITERATURE REVIEWSСовременные возможности функционального скрининга глаукомы (часть 1)Modern possibilities of functional glaucoma screening (part 1)https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8389-0421СимаковаИ. Л.SimakovaI. L.

Симакова Ирина Леонидовна, д.м.н., профессор кафедры офтальмологии

194044, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Боткинская, 21

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor at the Academic Department of Ophthalmology

21 Botkinskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 194044

irina.l.simakova@gmail.comhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5610-4421ГригорянЛ. А.GrigoryanL. A.

заместитель генерального директора по развитию бизнеса и управлению инновациями

119234, Москва, муниципальный округ Раменки, ул. Ленинские горы, 1, стр. 77, 101а

Deputy Chief Officer for Business Development and Innovation Management

1-77 Leninskie gory St., ofc. 101a, Moscow, 119234

ГорбачеваК. С.GorbachevaK. S.

врач-офтальмолог

197198, Санкт-Петербург, муниципальный округ Введенский, пр. Добролюбова, 20, к. 1, литера А, этаж 1, пом. 1-Н, часть пом. 1

ophthalmologist

20-1 litt. A at Dobroljubova pr., floor 1, room 1-Н, part of room 1, Saint Petersburg, 197198

Кафедра офтальмологии ФГБВОУ ВО «Военно-медицинская академия имени С.М. Кирова» Минобороны РФРоссияS.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Academic Department of OphthalmologyRussian FederationООО «Тотал Вижен»РоссияOOO Total VizhenRussian FederationООО «Инкерман»РоссияOOO InkermanRussian Federation20230712202322499111Copyright © Симакова И.Л., Григорян Л.А., Горбачева К.С., 20232023Симакова И.Л., Григорян Л.А., Горбачева К.С.Simakova I.L., Grigoryan L.A., Gorbacheva K.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/494

В настоящее время для функционального скрининга глаукомы широко используются методы стандартной и нестандартной компьютерной периметрии с использованием стационарных приборов. В зарубежной литературе последних лет появилась информация о новых портативных устройствах, предназначенных для периметрии, преимуществами которых, помимо экономической доступности, являются автономность и мобильность, открывающие новые возможности их применения. К новым возможностям относятся также облачное хранение данных, использование технологий телемедицины, искусственного интеллекта, обследование пациентов с ограниченными возможностями, в том числе лежачих, а также обследование вне медицинских учреждений. Все это позволит обеспечить глаукомных больных офтальмологической помощью во время их дистанцирования, в том числе социального, вследствие пандемии и карантина. Обзор литературы посвящен описанию новейших портативных устройств и приложений, предназначенных для периметрии, попытке их классифицировать по схожим параметрам, оценке преимуществ и недостатков, а также перспектив использования их для функционального скрининга глаукомы.

Nowadays methods of standard and non-standard computerized perimetry using stationary devices are widely used in functional screening of glaucoma. The information about new portable devices for perimetry has appeared in foreign literature in recent years, describing such advantages as economic availability, autonomy and mobility, which open up new possibilities for their use. New possibilities include cloud storage of data, the use of telemedicine technologies, artificial intelligence, examination of patients with disabilities, including those who are bedridden, as well as examination outside of medical institutions. All of this can allow glaucoma patients to receive ophthalmic care when in-person visits are unavailable, including social distancing needed during a pandemic or quarantine. This review of the literature describes the latest portable devices and applications for perimetry, attempts to classify them according to similar parameters, and assesses their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the prospects for their use in functional screening of glaucoma.

глаукомаскрининг глаукомыпортативные устройства для периметриистандартная и нестандартная периметрияFDT-периметрияglaucomaglaucoma screeningportable devices for perimetrystandard and non-standard perimetryFDT-perimetrReferencesКлинические рекомендации. Глаукома первичная открытоугольная. Утверждены Минздравом РФ, 2020. 62 с.Clinical recommendations. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2020; 62 p.Weinreb R.N., Greve E.L., editors. Glaucoma diagnosis: structure and function. The Netherlands (Hague): Kugler Publications; 2004. 162 p.Weinreb R.N., Greve E.L., editors. Glaucoma diagnosis: structure and function. The Netherlands (Hague): Kugler Publications; 2004. 162 p.Волков В.В. О стандартах для оценки наличия, течения и лечения глаукомы по рекомендациям экспертов Международной ассоциации глаукомных обществ (часть 1). Национальный журнал глаукома 2012; 2:60-64.Volkov V.V. On the standards for an assessment of existence, course and treatment of glaucoma according to recommendations of experts of the international association of glaucoma societies (part І). National Journal glaucoma 2012; 2:60-64.Волков В.В. О стандартах для оценки наличия, течения и лечения глаукомы по рекомендациям экспертов Международной ассоциации глаукомных обществ (часть 2). Национальный журнал глаукома 2012; 3:48-52.Volkov V.V. On the standards for an assessment of existence, course and glaucoma treatment according to recommendations of experts of the international association of glaucoma societies (part 2). National Journal glaucoma 2012; 3:48-52. (In Russ.)Егоров Е.А., Еричев В.П., редакторы. Национальное руководство по глаукоме для практикующих врачей. 4е изд. М: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2019; 384.Egorov E.A., Erichev V.P., editors. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome dlja praktikujushhih vrachej. 4e izd. [National guideline for glaucoma for medical practitioners. 4th edition]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media, 2019. 384 p.Волков В.В. Глаукома открытоугольная. Москва: Медицинское информационное агенство 2008; 347.Volkov V.V. Glaukoma otkrytougol´naya [Open-angle glaucoma]. Moscow, Medical information agency, 2008. 347 p.Симакова И.Л., Сухинин М.В., Сердюкова С.А. Эффективность различных методов компьютерной периметрии в диагностике первичной открытоугольной глаукомы (часть 1). Национальный журнал глаукома 2016; 15(1):25-36.Simakova I.L., Sukhinin M.V., Serdukova S.A. The effectiveness of various methods of computerized perimetry in primary open-angle glaucoma (part 1). National Journal glaucoma 2016; 15(1):25-36.Симакова И.Л., Сухинин М.В., Соболев А.Ф., Сердюкова С.А. Эффективность различных методов компьютерной периметрии в диагностике первичной открытоугольной глаукомы (часть 2). Национальный журнал глаукома 2016; 15(2):44-52.Simakova I.L., Sukhinin M.V., Sobolev A.F., Serdukova S.A. The effectiveness of various methods of computerized perimetry in primary open-angle glaucoma (part 2). National Journal glaucoma 2016; 15(2):44-52. (In Russ.)Егоров Е.А., Астахов Ю.С., Щуко А.Г., редакторы. Национальное руководство по глаукоме (путеводитель) для поликлинических врачей. Москва: ГЭОТАР-Медиа 2008; 135 с.Egorov E.A., Astahov Yu.S., Shhuko A.G., editors. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome (putevoditel') dlja poliklinicheskih vrachej [National guide to glaucoma (guidebook) for outpatient clinics]. Mos-cow, GEOTAR-Media,; 2008. 135 p.European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 5th ed. Italy (Savona): PubliComm; 2020. 170 p.European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma. 5th ed. Italy (Savona): PubliComm; 2020. 170 p.Курышева Н.И. Периметрия в диагностике глаукомной оптической нейропатии. М: ГРИНЛАЙТ 2015; 84.Kurysheva N.I. Perimetriya v diagnostike glaukomnoy opticheskoy nejropatii [Perimetry in the diagnosis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy]. Moscow, GRINLAYT, 2015. 84 p.Еричев В.П., Антонов А.А. Клиническая периметрия в диагностике и мониторинге глаукомы. М: Апрель 2016; 89.Erichev V.P., Antonov A.A. Klinicheskaja perimetrija v diagnostike i monitoringe glaukomy [Clinical perimetry in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma]. Moscow: Aprel Publ., 2016. 89 p.Nouri-Mahdavi K. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2014; 49(6):497-505.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.10.002.Nouri-Mahdavi K. Selecting visual field tests and assessing visual field deterioration in glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol 2014; 49(6):497-505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.10.002.Сердюкова С.А., Симакова И.Л. Компьютерная периметрия в диагностике первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Офтальмологические ведомости 2018; 1(11):63-74. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV11154-65.Serdukova S.A., Simakova I.L. Computer perimetry in the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma. Oftalmologičeskie vedomosti 2018; 1(11):63-74. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV11154-65.Симакова И.Л., Сердюкова С.А. Некоторые аспекты сравнительной характеристики разных методов компьютерной периметрии. Офтальмологические ведомости 2015; 2(8):5-9.Simakova I.L., Serdukova S.A. Some aspects of the comparative characteristics of different computerized perimetry methods. Oftalmologičeskie vedomosti 2015; 2(8):5-9.Campbell F.W., Green D.G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 181(3)576-593. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784.Campbell F.W., Green D.G. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 181(3)576-593. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1965.sp007784.Хьюбел Д. Глаз, мозг, зрение. М: Мир 1990; 239 с.H'jubel D. Glaz, mozg, zrenie [Eye, brain, vision]. Moscow, Mir Publ., 1990. 239 p.Вит В.В. Строение зрительной системы человека. Одесса: Астропринт 2003; 664.Vit V.V. Stroenie zritel'noi sistemy cheloveka [The structure of the human visual system]. Odessa, Astroprint, 2003. 664 p.Nealy T.A., Maunsell J.H. Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to the responses of neurons in macaque striate cortex. J Neurosci 1994; 14(4):2069-2079. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02069.1994.Nealy T.A., Maunsell J.H. Magnocellular and parvocellular contributions to the responses of neurons in macaque striate cortex. J Neurosci 1994; 14(4):2069-2079. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-04-02069.1994.Quigley H.A., Sanchez R.M., Dunkelburger G.R. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28(6):913-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(88)33176-3.Quigley H.A., Sanchez R.M., Dunkelburger G.R. Chronic glaucoma selectively damages large optic nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28(6):913-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(88)33176-3.Maddess T., Henry J. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci 1992; 7(5):371-383.Maddess T., Henry J. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vision Sci 1992; 7(5):371-383.Pammer K., Wheatley C. Isolating the M(y)-cell response in dyslexia using the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 2001; 41(3):2139-2147. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00092-x.Pammer K., Wheatley C. Isolating the M(y)-cell response in dyslexia using the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 2001; 41(3):2139-2147. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00092-x.Johnson C.A. Psychophysical measurement of glaucomatous damage. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 45(3):313-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(01)00201-6.Johnson C.A. Psychophysical measurement of glaucomatous damage. Surv Ophthalmol. 2001; 45(3):313-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(01)00201-6.Sample PA. Should SWAP and FDT be used to monitor glaucoma suspects with normal SAP? International glaucoma review 2008; 10(2, suppl.):3.Sample PA. Should SWAP and FDT be used to monitor glaucoma suspects with normal SAP? International glaucoma review 2008; 10(2, suppl.):3.Liu S., Yu M., Weinreb R.N., Lai G., Lam D.S.C., Leung C.K.S. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes. JAMA Ophthalmology 2014; 132(1):77-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5511.Liu S., Yu M., Weinreb R.N., Lai G., Lam D.S.C., Leung C.K.S. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes. JAMA Ophthalmology 2014; 132(1):77-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5511.Horn F.K., Scharch V., Mardin C.Y., Lämmer R., Kremers J. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254(5):937-946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3286-1.Horn F.K., Scharch V., Mardin C.Y., Lämmer R., Kremers J. Comparison of frequency doubling and flicker defined form perimetry in early. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2016; 254(5):937-946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3286-1.Morejon A., Mayo-Iscar A., Martin R., Ussa F. Development of a new algorithm based on FDT Matrix perimetry and SD-OCT to improve early glaucoma detection in primary care. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13:33-42. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S177581.Morejon A., Mayo-Iscar A., Martin R., Ussa F. Development of a new algorithm based on FDT Matrix perimetry and SD-OCT to improve early glaucoma detection in primary care. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019; 13:33-42. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S177581.Симакова И.Л., Тихоновская И.А. Оценка эффективности периметрии с удвоением пространственной частоты в диагностике оптиконейропатий. Национальный журнал глаукома 2022; 21(1): 23-35. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-1-23-35Simakova I.L., Tikhonovskaya I.A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of frequency doubling technology perimetry in the diagnosis of optic neuropathies. National Journal glaucoma 2022; 21(1):23-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-1-23-35Симакова И.Л., Волков В.В., Бойко Э.В., Клавдиев В.Е. Создание метода периметрии с удвоенной пространственной частотой за рубежом и в России. Национальный журнал глаукома 2009; 8(2):5-21.Simakova I.L., Volkov V.V., Boiko E.V., Klavdiev V.E. Creation of the method of frequency-doubling technology perimetry: an international and Russian experience. National Journal glaucoma 2009; 8(2):5-21.Тихоновская И.А., Симакова И.Л. Нестандартная компьютерная периметрия в диагностике некоторых оптических нейропатий. Офтальмологические ведомости 2021; 14(1):75-87. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV60059.Tihonovskaja, I.A., Simakova I.L. Non-standard computer perimetry in the diagnosis of some optic neuropathies. Oftalmologičeskie vedomosti 2021; 14(1):75-87. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV60059.Григорян Л.А., Симакова И.Л., Куроедов А.В. Периметрия как методика с позиций практического офтальмолога. Национальный журнал глаукома 2021; 3(20):21-29. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-3-21-29Grigoryan L.A., Simakova I.L., Kuroyedov A.V. Perimetry as a technique from the standpoint of practicing ophthalmologists. National Journal glaucoma 2021; 20(3):21-29. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-3-21-29Kasha J. R. Jr., inventor. Visual field perimetry using virtual reality glasses. US patent 5,737,060. 1998 Apr 7.Kasha J. R. Jr., inventor. Visual field perimetry using virtual reality glasses. US patent 5,737,060. 1998 Apr 7.Matsumoto C., Yamao S., Nomoto H., Takada S., Okuyama S., Kimura S., Kenzo Yamanaka K., Makoto Aihara M., Yoshikazu Shimomura Y. Visual field testing with head-mounted perimeter ‘imo’. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(8):e0161974. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161974.Matsumoto C., Yamao S., Nomoto H., Takada S., Okuyama S., Kimura S., Kenzo Yamanaka K., Makoto Aihara M., Yoshikazu Shimomura Y. Visual field testing with head-mounted perimeter ‘imo’. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(8):e0161974. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161974.Medeiros F.A., Zao J.K., Wang Y., Nakanishi M., Lin Y.-P., Diniz-Filho A., Jung T.-P. The nGoggle: a portable brain-based method for assessment of visual function deficits in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57(12).Medeiros F.A., Zao J.K., Wang Y., Nakanishi M., Lin Y.-P., Diniz-Filho A., Jung T.-P. The nGoggle: a portable brain-based method for assessment of visual function deficits in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016; 57(12).Alawa K.A., Nolan R.P., Han E., Arboleda A., Durkee H., Sayed M. S., Aguilar M.C., Lee R. K. Low-cost, smartphone-based frequency doubling technology visual field testing using a head-mounted display. British J Ophthalmol 2019; 0:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314031.Alawa K.A., Nolan R.P., Han E., Arboleda A., Durkee H., Sayed M. S., Aguilar M.C., Lee R. K. Low-cost, smartphone-based frequency doubling technology visual field testing using a head-mounted display. British J Ophthalmol 2019; 0:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314031.Shetty V., Sankhe P., Haldipurkar S. S., Haldipurkar T., Dhamankar R., Kashelkar P., Shah D., Mhatre P., Setia M. S. Diagnostic performance of the PalmScan VF2000 virtual reality visual field analyzer for identification and classification of glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2021; 17(1):33-41. https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i1.10168.Shetty V., Sankhe P., Haldipurkar S. S., Haldipurkar T., Dhamankar R., Kashelkar P., Shah D., Mhatre P., Setia M. S. Diagnostic performance of the PalmScan VF2000 virtual reality visual field analyzer for identification and classification of glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 2021; 17(1):33-41. https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i1.10168.Wan L., Yan W., Sun Y., Chang R. Comparison of virtual reality (Palm-Scan VF2000) visual fields analyzer with Humphrey visual field in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61(7).Wan L., Yan W., Sun Y., Chang R. Comparison of virtual reality (Palm-Scan VF2000) visual fields analyzer with Humphrey visual field in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61(7).Johnson C.A., Thapa S., George Kong Y.X., Robin A.L. Performance of an iPad application to detect moderate and advanced visual field loss in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 182:147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.007.Johnson C.A., Thapa S., George Kong Y.X., Robin A.L. Performance of an iPad application to detect moderate and advanced visual field loss in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 182:147-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.007.Vingrys A.J., Healey J.K., Liew S., Saharinen V., Tran M., Wu W., Kong G.Y.X. Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2016; 5(4):3. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3.Vingrys A.J., Healey J.K., Liew S., Saharinen V., Tran M., Wu W., Kong G.Y.X. Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2016; 5(4):3. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3.Lowry E.A., Hou J., Hennein L., Chang R.T., Lin S., Keenan J., Wang S.K., Ianchulev S., Pasquale L. R., Han Y. Comparison of Peristat online perimetry with the Humphrey perimetry in a clinic-based setting. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2016; 5(4):4. https://doi.org/10.1167/ tvst.5.4.4.Lowry E.A., Hou J., Hennein L., Chang R.T., Lin S., Keenan J., Wang S.K., Ianchulev S., Pasquale L. R., Han Y. Comparison of Peristat online perimetry with the Humphrey perimetry in a clinic-based setting. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2016; 5(4):4. https://doi.org/10.1167/ tvst.5.4.4.Jones P.R., Smith N.D., Bi W., Crabb D.P. Portable perimetry using eye-tracking on a tablet computer – a feasibility assessment. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2019; 8(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.1.17.Jones P.R., Smith N.D., Bi W., Crabb D.P. Portable perimetry using eye-tracking on a tablet computer – a feasibility assessment. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2019; 8(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.1.17.Ong E.L., Zheng Y., Aung T., Tan L., Cheng C.Y., Wong T.Y., How A. Performance of the Moorfields Motion Displacement Test for identifying eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2014; 121:88-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.036.Ong E.L., Zheng Y., Aung T., Tan L., Cheng C.Y., Wong T.Y., How A. Performance of the Moorfields Motion Displacement Test for identifying eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2014; 121:88-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.08.036.Selvaraj D. Using Google Cardboard to perform a visual field screening test. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State Univ.; 2018.Selvaraj D. Using Google Cardboard to perform a visual field screening test. Ames (Iowa): Iowa State Univ.; 2018.Zao J.K., Jung T.-P., Chang H.-M., Gan T.-T., Wang Y.-T., Lin Y.-P., Wen-Hao Liu W.-H., Guang-Yu Zheng G.-Y., Chin-Kuo Lin C.-K., Chia-Hung Lin C.-H., Yu-Yi Chien Y.-Y., Lin F.-C., Huang Y.-P., Méndez S.J.R., Medeiros F.A. Augmenting VR/AR Applications with EEG/EOG Monitoring and Oculo-Vestibular Recoupling. Foundations of augmented cognition: neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016.Zao J.K., Jung T.-P., Chang H.-M., Gan T.-T., Wang Y.-T., Lin Y.-P., Wen-Hao Liu W.-H., Guang-Yu Zheng G.-Y., Chin-Kuo Lin C.-K., Chia-Hung Lin C.-H., Yu-Yi Chien Y.-Y., Lin F.-C., Huang Y.-P., Méndez S.J.R., Medeiros F.A. Augmenting VR/AR Applications with EEG/EOG Monitoring and Oculo-Vestibular Recoupling. Foundations of augmented cognition: neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016.Sircar T., Mishra A., Bopardikar A., Narayan Tiwari V.N. GearVision: smartphone-based head mounted perimeter for detection of visual field defects. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2018; 2018:5402-5405. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513574.Sircar T., Mishra A., Bopardikar A., Narayan Tiwari V.N. GearVision: smartphone-based head mounted perimeter for detection of visual field defects. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2018; 2018:5402-5405. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513574.Ahmed Y., Pereira A., Bowden S., Shi R.B., Li Y., Ahmed I.K., Steve A. Multicenter comparison of the Toronto portable perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer. A pilot study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2022; 5(2):146-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.011.Ahmed Y., Pereira A., Bowden S., Shi R.B., Li Y., Ahmed I.K., Steve A. Multicenter comparison of the Toronto portable perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer. A pilot study. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2022; 5(2):146-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.011.Nida E.K., Bekele S., Geurts L., Abeele V.V. Acceptance of a smart-phone-based visual field screening platform for glaucoma: pre-post study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5(9):e26602. https://doi.org/10.2196/26602.Nida E.K., Bekele S., Geurts L., Abeele V.V. Acceptance of a smart-phone-based visual field screening platform for glaucoma: pre-post study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5(9):e26602. https://doi.org/10.2196/26602.Tsapakis S., Papaconstantinou D., Diagourtas A., Droutsas K., Andreanos K., Moschos M.M., Brouzas D. Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11:1431-1443. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S131160.Tsapakis S., Papaconstantinou D., Diagourtas A., Droutsas K., Andreanos K., Moschos M.M., Brouzas D. Visual field examination method using virtual reality glasses compared with the Humphrey perimeter. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11:1431-1443. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S131160.Hu G.Y., Prasad J., Chen D.K., Alcantara-Castillo J.C., Patel V.N., Al-Aswad L.A. Home monitoring of glaucoma using a home tonometer and a novel Virtual reality visual field device: acceptability and feasibility. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2022.05.001.Hu G.Y., Prasad J., Chen D.K., Alcantara-Castillo J.C., Patel V.N., Al-Aswad L.A. Home monitoring of glaucoma using a home tonometer and a novel Virtual reality visual field device: acceptability and feasibility. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2022.05.001.Kashem R., Goldbach A.H., Elsawy A., Mohder F., Bonyadi S., Sharma M., Christian Duque C., Taher Eleiwa T., Abdulla R. Shaheen A.R., Shousha M.A., Parrish R. Comparison of Heru Visual field as a cloud based artificial intelligence-powered software application downloadable on commercial augmented reality headset with Humphrey field analyzer SITA Standard. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021; 62(8).Kashem R., Goldbach A.H., Elsawy A., Mohder F., Bonyadi S., Sharma M., Christian Duque C., Taher Eleiwa T., Abdulla R. Shaheen A.R., Shousha M.A., Parrish R. Comparison of Heru Visual field as a cloud based artificial intelligence-powered software application downloadable on commercial augmented reality headset with Humphrey field analyzer SITA Standard. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021; 62(8).Stapelfeldt J., Kucur S.S., Huber N., Höhn R., Sznitman R. Virtual reality–based and conventional visual field examination comparison in healthy and glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10(12):10. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.12.10.Stapelfeldt J., Kucur S.S., Huber N., Höhn R., Sznitman R. Virtual reality–based and conventional visual field examination comparison in healthy and glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10(12):10. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.12.10.Reza R., Alberto G. G., Jonathan M. S., Jay K. L. Preliminary report on a novel virtual reality perimeter compared with standard automated perimetry. J Glaucoma 2021; 30:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001670.Reza R., Alberto G. G., Jonathan M. S., Jay K. L. Preliminary report on a novel virtual reality perimeter compared with standard automated perimetry. J Glaucoma 2021; 30:17-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001670.Greenfield J.A., Deiner M., Nguyen A., Wollstein G., Damato B., Backus B.T., Wu M., Schuman J.S., Ou Y. Measurement reproducibility using Vivid Vision Perimetry: a virtual reality-based mobile platform. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61(7).Greenfield J.A., Deiner M., Nguyen A., Wollstein G., Damato B., Backus B.T., Wu M., Schuman J.S., Ou Y. Measurement reproducibility using Vivid Vision Perimetry: a virtual reality-based mobile platform. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 61(7).Narang P., Agarwal A., Srinivasan M., Agarwal A. Advanced vision analyzer-virtual reality perimeter: device validation, functional correlation and comparison with Humphrey field analyzer. Ophthalmol Sci 2021; 1(2):100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100035.Narang P., Agarwal A., Srinivasan M., Agarwal A. Advanced vision analyzer-virtual reality perimeter: device validation, functional correlation and comparison with Humphrey field analyzer. Ophthalmol Sci 2021; 1(2):100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xops.2021.100035.Kunumpol P., Lerthirunvibul N., Phienphanich P., Munthuli A., Tantisevi V., Manassakorn A., Chansangpetch S., Itthipanichpong R., Ratanawongphaibol K., Rojanapongpun P., Tantibundhit C. GlauCUTU: virtual reality visual field test. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2021; 2021:7416-7421. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629827.Kunumpol P., Lerthirunvibul N., Phienphanich P., Munthuli A., Tantisevi V., Manassakorn A., Chansangpetch S., Itthipanichpong R., Ratanawongphaibol K., Rojanapongpun P., Tantibundhit C. GlauCUTU: virtual reality visual field test. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2021; 2021:7416-7421. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9629827.Soans R.S., Renken R.J., John J., Bhongade A., Raj D., Saxena R., Tan-don R., Gandhi T.K., Cornelissen F.W. Patients prefer a virtual reality approach over a similarly performing screen-based approach for continuous oculomotor-based screening of glaucomatous and neuro-ophthalmological visual field defects. Front Neurosci 2021;15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.745355.Soans R.S., Renken R.J., John J., Bhongade A., Raj D., Saxena R., Tan-don R., Gandhi T.K., Cornelissen F.W. Patients prefer a virtual reality approach over a similarly performing screen-based approach for continuous oculomotor-based screening of glaucomatous and neuro-ophthalmological visual field defects. Front Neurosci 2021;15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.745355.Еричев В.П., Ермолаев А.П., Антонов А.А., Котляр К., Мазурова Ю.В., Левицкий Ю.В., Хдери Х. Исследование поля зрения при помощи портативного периметра выполненного на базе шлема виртуальной реальности. Новости глаукомы 2018; 4(48):42-43. https://doi.org/10.30808/978-5-6040782-2018-1-1-106-110.Erichev V.P., Ermolaev A.P., Antonov A.A., Kotliar K., Mazurova Iu.V., Levitsky Yu.V., Hderi K. Study of the field of view using a portable perimeter made on the basis of a virtual reality helmet. Glaucoma news 2018; 4(48):42-43. https://doi.org/10.30808/978-5-6040782-2018-1-1-106-110.Mees L., Upadhyaya S., Kumar P., Kotawala, S., Haran S., Rajasekar S., Friedman D.S., Venkatesh R. Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality visual field screening device. J Glaucoma 2020; 29(2):86-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.Mees L., Upadhyaya S., Kumar P., Kotawala, S., Haran S., Rajasekar S., Friedman D.S., Venkatesh R. Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality visual field screening device. J Glaucoma 2020; 29(2):86-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415.Wroblewski D., Francis B.A., Sadun A., Vakili G., Chopra V. Testing of visual field with virtual reality goggles in manual and visual grasp modes. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/206082.Wroblewski D., Francis B.A., Sadun A., Vakili G., Chopra V. Testing of visual field with virtual reality goggles in manual and visual grasp modes. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/206082.Liu J., McAnany J.J., Wilensky J.T., Aref A.A., Vajaranant T.S. M&S Smart System contrast sensitivity measurements compared to standard visual function measurements in primary open angle glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2017; 26(6):528-533. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000659.Liu J., McAnany J.J., Wilensky J.T., Aref A.A., Vajaranant T.S. M&S Smart System contrast sensitivity measurements compared to standard visual function measurements in primary open angle glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2017; 26(6):528-533. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000659.Goh R.L.Z., Kong Y.X.G., McAlinden C., Liu J., Crowston J.G., Skalicky S.E. Objective assessment of activity limitation in glaucoma with smartphone virtual reality goggles: a pilot study. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2018; 7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1167/ tvst.7.1.10.Goh R.L.Z., Kong Y.X.G., McAlinden C., Liu J., Crowston J.G., Skalicky S.E. Objective assessment of activity limitation in glaucoma with smartphone virtual reality goggles: a pilot study. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2018; 7(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.1.10.Jong C., Skalicky S.E. The computerized glaucoma visual function test: a pilot study evaluating computer-screen based tests of visual function in glaucoma. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2020; 9(12):9. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.12.9.Jong C., Skalicky S.E. The computerized glaucoma visual function test: a pilot study evaluating computer-screen based tests of visual function in glaucoma. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2020; 9(12):9. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.12.9.Sipatchin A., Wahl S., Rifai K. Eye-Tracking for clinical ophthalmology with virtual reality (VR): a case study of the HTC Vive Pro Eye’s Usability. Healthcare 2021; 9(2):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020180.Sipatchin A., Wahl S., Rifai K. Eye-Tracking for clinical ophthalmology with virtual reality (VR): a case study of the HTC Vive Pro Eye’s Usability. Healthcare 2021; 9(2):180. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9020180.Rodriguez-Una I., Azuara-Blanco A. New technologies for glaucoma detection. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2018; 7(6):394-404. https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.2018349.Rodriguez-Una I., Azuara-Blanco A. New technologies for glaucoma detection. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2018; 7(6):394-404. https://doi.org/10.22608/APO.2018349.Santos A.S., Morabe E.S. “VisualFields Easy”: an iPad application as a simple tool for detecting visual field defects. Philipp J Ophthalmol 2016; 41:22-26.Santos A.S., Morabe E.S. “VisualFields Easy”: an iPad application as a simple tool for detecting visual field defects. Philipp J Ophthalmol 2016; 41:22-26.Ichhpujani P., Thakur S., Sahi R.K., Kumar S. Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey visual field analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 69(1):87-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1847_19.Ichhpujani P., Thakur S., Sahi R.K., Kumar S. Validating tablet perimetry against standard Humphrey visual field analyzer for glaucoma screening in Indian population. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2020; 69(1):87-91. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1847_19.Kitayama K., Young A.G., Ochoa A., Yu F., Wong K.Y.-S., Coleman A.L. The agreement between an ipad visual field app and Humphrey frequency doubling technology in visual field screening at health fairs. J Glaucoma 2021; 30(9):846-850. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001902.Kitayama K., Young A.G., Ochoa A., Yu F., Wong K.Y.-S., Coleman A.L. The agreement between an ipad visual field app and Humphrey frequency doubling technology in visual field screening at health fairs. J Glaucoma 2021; 30(9):846-850. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001902.Vingrys A.J., Healey J.K., Liew S., Saharinen V., Tran M., Wu W., George Y. X. Kong. Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2016; 5(4):3. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3.Vingrys A.J., Healey J.K., Liew S., Saharinen V., Tran M., Wu W., George Y. X. Kong. Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Trans Vis Sci Tech 2016; 5(4):3. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3.Chia M.A., Trang E., Agar A., Vingrys A.J., Hepschke J., Kong G.Y., Turner A.W. Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021; 15(3):125-131. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312.Chia M.A., Trang E., Agar A., Vingrys A.J., Hepschke J., Kong G.Y., Turner A.W. Screening for Glaucomatous Visual Field Defects in Rural Australia with an iPad. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2021; 15(3):125-131. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1312.Schulz A.M., Graham E.C., You Y.Y., Klistorner A., Graham S.L. Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46(4):346-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13082.Schulz A.M., Graham E.C., You Y.Y., Klistorner A., Graham S.L. Performance of iPad-based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46(4):346-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13082.Prea S.M., Kong G.Y.X., Mehta A., He M., Crowston J.G., Gupta V., Martin K.R., Vingrys A.J. Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 190:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009.Prea S.M., Kong G.Y.X., Mehta A., He M., Crowston J.G., Gupta V., Martin K.R., Vingrys A.J. Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 190:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009.Kumar H., Thulasidas M. Comparison of perimetric outcomes from melbourne rapid fields tablet perimeter software and Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients. J Ophthalmol 2020; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8384509.Kumar H., Thulasidas M. Comparison of perimetric outcomes from melbourne rapid fields tablet perimeter software and Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients. J Ophthalmol 2020; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8384509.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.