<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="editorial" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">glaucoma</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Национальный журнал Глаукома</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>National Journal glaucoma</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2078-4104</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2311-6862</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science “Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases”</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">glaucoma-537</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МНЕНИЕ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>OPINION</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Отзыв на статью Чупрова А.Д., Пидодний Е.А., Трубникова В.А. «Сравнительная характеристика тонометрии по Маклакову и автоматизированных методов измерения внутриглазного давления», опубликованной в «Национальном журнале глаукома». 2023; 22(4):27-32.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Comments on the article by Chuprov A.D., Pidodniy E.A., Trubnikov V.A. "Comparative analysis of Maklakov and automated ocular tonometry methods of intraocular pressure measurement" published in National Journal of Glaucoma. 2023; 22(4):27-32</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Редакционная</surname><given-names>статья</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Editorial</surname><given-names>Article</given-names></name></name-alternatives></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>09</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>68</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Редакционная с., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Редакционная с.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Editorial a.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/537">https://www.glaucomajournal.ru/jour/article/view/537</self-uri><abstract><p>.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>.</p></trans-abstract></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers. 2nd edition. Thomas A Lang and Michelle Secic. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. 2006. 490 pages.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers. 2nd edition. Thomas A Lang and Michelle Secic. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. 2006. 490 pages.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Altman DG and Bland JM. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307- 310.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Altman DG and Bland JM. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307- 310.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bang, S.P., Lee, C.E. &amp; Kim, Y.C. Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects. BMC Ophthalmol 17, 199 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0593-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bang, S.P., Lee, C.E. &amp; Kim, Y.C. Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects. BMC Ophthalmol 17, 199 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-017-0593-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yildiz, M. B. (2023). Agreement among Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Easyton Transpalpebral Tonometer, Tonopen, and Icare in Patients with Keratoconus. In Beyoglu Eye Journal (pp. 170–176). Kare Publishing. https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2023.56933</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yildiz, M. B. (2023). Agreement among Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Easyton Transpalpebral Tonometer, Tonopen, and Icare in Patients with Keratoconus. In Beyoglu Eye Journal (pp. 170–176). Kare Publishing. https://doi.org/10.14744/bej.2023.56933</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen M, Zhang L, Xu J, Chen X, Gu Y, Ren Y, Wang K. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019- 1236-5. PMID: 31726999; PMCID: PMC6857285.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen M, Zhang L, Xu J, Chen X, Gu Y, Ren Y, Wang K. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019- 1236-5. PMID: 31726999; PMCID: PMC6857285.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ланг Т., Альтман Д. Основы описания статистического анализа в статьях, публикуемых в биомедицинских журналах. Руководство «Статистический анализ и методы в публикуемой литературе (САМПЛ)». Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор. 2014; 1(15), 11-16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ланг Т., Альтман Д. Основы описания статистического анализа в статьях, публикуемых в биомедицинских журналах. Руководство «Статистический анализ и методы в публикуемой литературе (САМПЛ)». Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор. 2014; 1(15), 11-16.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Staffa, S., &amp; Zurakowski, D. (2019). Calculation of Confidence Intervals for Differences in Medians Between Groups and Comparison of Methods. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004535.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Staffa, S., &amp; Zurakowski, D. (2019). Calculation of Confidence Intervals for Differences in Medians Between Groups and Comparison of Methods. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004535.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зорин Н.А. «Достоверность» или «статистическая значимость» — 12 лет спустя. Медицинские технологии: оценка и выбор. 2011, № 2, с. 89-97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Зорин Н.А. «Достоверность» или «статистическая значимость» — 12 лет спустя. Медицинские технологии: оценка и выбор. 2011, № 2, с. 89-97.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gianicolo EAL, Eichler M, Muensterer O, et al. Methods for Evaluating Causality in Observational Studies. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Feb 14; 116(7):101-107. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0101. PMID: 32164822; PMCID: PMC7081045</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gianicolo EAL, Eichler M, Muensterer O, et al. Methods for Evaluating Causality in Observational Studies. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Feb 14; 116(7):101-107. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0101. PMID: 32164822; PMCID: PMC7081045</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
