Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Laser reconstruction of the non-penetrating deep sclerectomy zone blocked by peripheral iris

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effectiveness of laser reconstruction of the non-penetrating deep sclerectomy (NPDS) zone blocked by peripheral iris. METHODS: The study was based on the analysis of 95 cases (95 patients) of postoperative trabeculo-Descemet’s membrane (TDM) blockade with a part of peripheral iris: in 65 patients (65 eyes) — after NPDS in 30 patients (30 eyes) — after laser descemeto-goniopuncture (DGP). IOP level at the time of NPDS zone blockade diagnosis averaged 27.04±5.20 mmHg. All patients underwent laser reconstruction of the surgical zone, which included laser gonioplasty, iridectomy and, if possible, DGP. RESULTS: In 10 out of 65 cases of NPDS zone blockade, a suspension of formed elements was found in the anterior chamber fluid, in 3 of these cases patients presented with a 2 mm hyphema. In 27 cases (41.5%) NPDS zone blockade was not completely eliminated. On the 1st day after laser surgery, IOP decreased to an average of 17.34±3.50 mmHg. A 3 mm hyphema was observed in 2 cases of post-DGP blockade. Patients of the 2nd group had an average IOP level of 18.65±4.65 mmHg. It was possible to remove the operation zone blockade in 21 cases (70%), with 19 cases of partial and 2 cases of complete blockade. In other cases the blockade remained in more than 2/3 of the TDM length. CONCLUSION: One of the main predisposing factors of NPDS zone blockade onset is TDM perforation intraoperatively or during laser DGP.

 

About the Authors

N. S. Khodjaev
The S. Fedorov Eye Microsurgery State Institution
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Professor, Deputy Director


A. V. Sidorova
The S. Fedorov Eye Microsurgery State Institution
Russian Federation
M.D., Ophthalmic surgeon, Head of glaucoma surgery department


A. V. Starostina
The S. Fedorov Eye Microsurgery State Institution
Russian Federation
postgraduate student


References

1. Бабушкин А.Э., Матюхина Е.Н. Непроникающая глубокая склерэктомия и ее варианты в лечении первичной открытоугольной глаукомы (обзор литературы). Восток-Запад: материалы конф. с международным участием. Уфа, 2013; 170-173. [Babushkin A.E., Matyukhina E.N. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy and its variants in primary open-angle glaucoma treatment. (literature review). Vostok-Zapad: materials of international conference. Ufa, 2013; 170-173. (In Russ.)].

2. Ерескин Н.Н., Магарамов Д.А. Основные причины недостаточной эффективности операции НГСЭ и их устранение. Новые технологии микрохирургии глаза: научно-практическая конференция офтальмологов, 6-я: материалы. Оренбург-Орск, 1998; 25-26. [Ereskin N.N., Magaramov D.A. Main reasons of insufficient efficacy of non-penetrating glaucoma surgery and its elimination. New technologies of eye microsurgery: scientific and practical conference of ophthalmologists, the 6th: the materials. Orenburg-Orsk, 1998; 25-26. (In Russ.)].

3. Козлов В.И., Козлова Е.Е., Соколовская Т.В., Сидорова А.В. Причины повышения внутриглазного давления в ближайшие и отдаленные сроки после непроникающей глубокой склерэктомии. Перспективные направления в хирургическом лечении глаукомы: сб. науч. ст. М., 1997; 50-54. [Kozlov V.I., Kozlova E.E., Sokolovskaya T.V., Sidorova A.V. Reasons of IOP elevation in early and late postoperative period after non-penetrating deep sclerectomy. Perspective trends in the glaucoma surgery: collection of scientific articles. Moscow, 1997; 50-54. (In Russ.)].

4. Gesser C., Klemm M. Post-surgical treatment after non-penetrating glaucoma surgery: goniopuncture. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2014; 231(6):631-635. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1351060. Epub 2013 Dec 10.

5. Mermoud A. Non-penetrating Glaucoma Surgery. New York, 2001; 193 p.

6. Магарамов Д.А., Соколовская Т.В., Усольцева Е.А., Козлова Н.А. Лазерная реконструкция угла передней камеры при гипертензии после непроникающей глубокой склерэктомии у больных глаукомой. Съезд офтальмологов России, 9-й: Тезисы докладов. Москва, 2010; 75. [Magaramov D.A., Sokolovskaya T.V., Usol’tseva E.A., Kozlova N.A. Laser reconstruction of anterior chamber angle in hypertension after non-penetrating sclerectomy in glaucoma patients. Congress of Russian ophthalmologists, the 9th: theses of reports. Moscow, 2010; 75. (In Russ.)].

7. Тахчиди Х.П., Егорова Э.В., Узунян Д.Г. Ультразвуковая биомикроскопия в диагностике патологии переднего сегмента глаза. М.: Микрохирургия глаза, 2008; 128 c. [Takhchidi Kh.P., Egorova E.V., Uzunyan D.G. Ul’trazvukovaja biomikroskopija v diagnostike patologii perednego segmenta glaza. [Ultrasound biomicroscopy in the eye anterior segment pathology diagnostics]. Moscow, Mikrokhirurgiya glaza, 2008; 128 p. (In Russ.)].

8. Guedes R.A., Guedes V.M., Chaoubah A. Factors associated with non-penetrating deep sclerectomy failure in controlling intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 2011: 89(1):58-61. doi: 10.1111/ j.1755-3768.2009.01630.x.

9. Hilgert C.R., Hilgert G.H., Hardoim V.A., Omi C.A. Late recurrent iris synechia following laser goniopuncture for deep sclerectomy enhancement: case report. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2012; 75(6):433-435.

10. Hyams M., Geyer O. Iris prolapse at the surgical site: a late complication of non-penetrating deep sclerectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 2003; 34(2):132-135.

11. Roy S., Mermoud A. Complications of deep nonpenetrating sclerectomy. J Fr Ophtalmol 2006; 29(10):1180-1197.

12. Strnad P., Sva inov J., Vlkov E. Complications of deep nonpenetrating sclerectomy. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2012; 68(3):109-113.

13. Vuori M.L. Gonioscopic view of the trabeculo-Descemet’s membrane after deep sclerectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004; 82(2):154-157.

14. Tam D.Y., Barnebey H.S., Ahmed I. Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture: indications and procedure. J Glaucoma 2013; 22(8):620-625. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31824d512a.

15. Vuori M.L. Complications of Neodymium:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81(6):573-576.

16. Басинский С.Н. Частота осложнений и сравнительная эффективность хирургического лечения первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. РМЖ Клиническая офтальмология 2011; 12(2):67-70. [Basinskii S.N. Frequency of complications and comparative efficacy of surgical treatment of POAG (Literary review). RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2011; 12(2):67-70. (In Russ.)].

17. Егорова Э.В., Сидорова А.В., Оплетина А.В., Еременко И.Л., Шормаз И.Н. Профилактика интраоперационных осложнений при проведении неперфорирующих антиглаукоматозных операций. Сибирский научный медицинский журнал 2015; 35(2): 55-59. [Egorova E.V., Sidorova A.V., Opletina A.V., Eremenko I.L., Shormaz I.N. Prevention of intraoperative complications during nonpenetrating glaucoma operations. Sibirskii nauchnyi meditsinskii zhurnal 2015; 35(2):55-59. (In Russ.)].

18. Kim C.Y., Hong Y.J., Seong G.J. et al. Iris synechia after laser goniopuncture in a patient having deep sclerectomy with a collagen implant. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28(5):900-902.

19. Anand N., Pilling R. Nd:YAG laser goniopuncture after deep sclerectomy: outcomes. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88(1):110-115. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01494.x. Epub 2009 Mar 19.

20. Магарамов Д.А., Соколовская Т.В., Усольцева Е.А., Козлова Н.А. Лазерная реконструкция угла передней камеры при гипертензии после непроникающей глубокой склерэктомии у больных глаукомой. Съезд офтальмологов России, 9-й: Тезисы докладов. Москва, 2010; 75. [Magaramov D.A., Sokolovskaya T.V., Usol’tseva E.A., Kozlova N.A. Laser reconstruction of anterior chamber angle in hypertension after non-penetrating sclerectomy in glaucoma patients. Congress of Russian ophthalmologists, the 9th: theses of reports. Moscow, 2010; 75. (In Russ.)].

21. Al-Obeidan S.A. Incidence, efficacy and safety of YAG laser goniopuncture following non-penetrating deep sclerectomy at a university hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2015; 29(2):95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.09.015.


Review

For citations:


Khodjaev N.S., Sidorova A.V., Starostina A.V. Laser reconstruction of the non-penetrating deep sclerectomy zone blocked by peripheral iris. National Journal glaucoma. 2017;16(3):28-34. (In Russ.)

Views: 1475


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)