Frequency of occurrence and possible causes of ophthalmic hypertension after phacoemulsification in POAG patients
Abstract
PURPOSE: Retrospective analysis of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in POAG patients with initial medically normalized IOP. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 60 case histories of POAG patients who underwent surgery for age-related cataract in the Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases during the period from 2013 to 2016 and developed a postoperative IOP elevation. The results of dynamic bidirectional pneumotonometry (Ocular Response Analyzer, USA) were used to study IOP dynamics in the operated patients. Corneal-compensated IOP parameters were analyzed. RESULTS: To identify the possible causes of postoperative ocular hypertension, patients were divided into groups depending on the course of both the operation and the postoperative period (complicated and uncomplicated), degree and duration of ocular hypertension as well as undertaken hypotensive measures. The first group included 50 patients, divided into 2 subgroups. In 30 patients (1A subgroup) I-II stage of POAG was diagnosed, and preoperative steady IOP compensation was achieved either by monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors or β-blockers; or by fixed combination of drugs of the same pharmacological groups. IOPcc before the operation ranged from 11.1 to 21 mmHg with a median value of 15 mmHg. On the first day after the operation, a statistically significant increase in intraocular pressure of varying severity in patients of the first subgroup was registered, for which some patients (19 patients, 19 eyes) required an increase in local antihypertensive therapy. By the end of inpatient treatment IOPcc was normalized in all the patients, almost reaching the initial level. 1B subgroup included 20 patients with I-III stages of glaucoma, who required two or more local antihypertensive drugs for preoperative IOP normalization. Initial IOPcc values ranged from 17.7 to 24.1 mmHg with a median value of 20.8 mmHg. These patients developed a persistent increase in IOPcc after uncomplicated phacoemulsification, which required additional antihypertensive therapy. By the end of the treatment period, intraocular pressure in 9 patients was lowered to the initial values. The remaining 11 patients underwent glaucoma surgery at different times. The second group consisted of 10 patients with different stages of POAG, whose operation was complicated by postoperative inflammation and intraocular pressure decompensation. IOPcc values prior to phacoemulsification ranged from 15.5 to 19.3 mmHg with a median value of 17.2 mmHg. In the early postoperative period, these patients showed signs of inflammation of varying severity and an average IOPcc increase by 14 mmHg. In these cases we started systemic and local anti-inflammatory and dehydration therapy and increased local hypotensive regimen. With the above-listed measures, inflammatory conditions completely regressed, and intraocular pressure in these patients reached the baseline level by the end of the inpatient treatment. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma patients may present with IOP elevation in early postoperative period after uncomplicated phacoemulsification, which in most cases is transient. However, some patients may develop a persistent IOP decompensation, requiring additional antihypertensive therapy and/or glaucoma surgery. In cases of complicated phacoemulsification the severity and duration of ocular hypertension are defined, as a rule, by the rapidity of postoperative inflammation regression.
About the Authors
S. E. AvetisovRussian Federation
RAS Academician, Professor, Scientific Director
V. P. Erichev
Russian Federation
Med.Sc.D., Professor, Deputy Director for Innovative Studies
I. V. Kozlova
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Senior Research Associate of the Glaucoma Department
J. V. Kosova
Russian Federation
Postgraduate student of the Glaucoma Department
References
1. Егорова Э.В., Балашова Н.В., Толчинская А.И. Оценка хирургии катаракты с интраокулярной коррекцией афакии на глаукоматозных глазах. В кн.: Глаукома: проблемы и решения: Сборник научных статей. 2004: 351-356. [Egorova E.V., Balashova N.V., Tolchinskaja A.I. Evaluation of cataract surgery with intraocular aphakia correction in the glaucomatous eyes. In: Glaucoma: problems and solutions: collection of scientific articles. 2004: 351-356. (In Russ.)].
2. Малюгин Б.Э., Джндоян Г.Т. Современные аспекты хирургического лечения сочетания глаукомы и катаракты. В кн.: Глаукома: проблемы и решения: Сборник научных статей. 2004: 373-377. [Malyugin B.E., Dzhndoyan G.T. Modern aspects of glaucoma and cataract combined treatment. In: Glaucoma: problems and solutions: collection of scientific articles. 2004: 373-377. (In Russ.)].
3. Hayashi K., Yasutani H., Hayashi H., Hayashi F. Intraocular pressure rise after phacoemulsification surgery in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004; 30:1219-1224.
4. Poley B.J., Lindstrom R.L., Samuelson T.W., Schulze R. Intraocular pressure reduction after phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous eyes: evaluation of a causal relationship between the natural lens and openangle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35:1946-1955.
5. Рябцева А.А. Реактивная гипертензия после экстракции катаракты: Автореферат дисс. … канд. мед. наук. М., 1988; 20 с. [Ryabtseva A.A. Reactive hypertension after cataract extraction: abstract of a PhD dissertation. Moscow, 1988. 20 р. (In Russ.)].
6. Huang G., Gonzalez E., Lee R., Chen Y.C., He M., Lin S.C. Association of biometric factors with anterior chamber angle widening and intraocular pressure reduction after uneventful phacoemulsification for cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.06.037.
7. Kim M., Park K.H., Kim T.W., Kim D.M. Anterior chamber configuration changes after cataract surgery in eyes with glaucoma. Korean J Ophthalmol 2012; 26: 97-103. doi: 10.3341/ kjo.2012.26.2.97.
8. Bhallil S., Andalloussi I.B., Chraibi F., Daoudi K., Tahri H. Changes in intraocular pressure after clear corneal phacoemulsification in normal patients. Oman J Ophthalmol 2009; 2:111-113. doi:10.4103/0974-620X.57309.
9. Яшина Л.В., Алексеев И.Б., Кочергин С.А. Возможности коррекции внутриглазной гидродинамики в ходе факоэмульсификации катаракты у пациентов с оперированной глаукомой. РМЖ Клиническая офтальмология 2008; 4: 151-153. [Yashina L.V., Alekseev I.B., Kochergin S.A. Possibilities of eye hemodynamic correction during phacoemulsification in patients with operated glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2008; 4:151-153. (In Russ.)].
10. Арутюнян Л.Л., Анисимов С.И., Анисимова С.Ю., Полякова К.М. Гипотензивная эффективность ингибитора карбоангидразы дорзопта при послеоперационной офтальмогипертензии у пациентов с катарактой и первичной открыто- угольной глаукомой. Российский офтальмологический журнал 2013; 4:23-26. [Arutyunyan L.L., Anisimov S.I., Anisimova S.Yu., Polyakova K.M. Hypotensive effectiveness of the dorsopt carboxohydrase inhibitor in postoperative ophthalmic hypertension in patients with cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. Russian Ophthalmological J 2013; 4:23-26. (In Russ.)].
11. Suzuki R., Tanaka K., Sagara T., Fukiwara N. Reduction of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification and aspiration with intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmologica 1994; 208:254-258.
12. Vass C., Menapace R. Surgical strategies in patients with combined cataract and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15(1):61-66.
13. Schwenn O., Pfeiffer N., Garcia-Feijoo J., Martinez-de-la-Casa J.M. A randomized trial of a schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2015; 122(7):1283-1293. doi: 10.1016/ j.ophtha.2015.03.031.
14. Петров С.Ю., Мазурова Ю.В., Асламазова А.Э., Фокина Н.Д., Вострухин С.В. Применение вискоэластиков в офтальмохирургии. Национальный журнал глаукома 2016; 15(1):97-104. [Petrov S.Yu., Mazurova Yu.V., Aslamazov A.E., Fokina N.D., Vostrukhin S.V. Application of viscoelastics in ophthalmic surgery. National Journal of Glaucoma 2016; 15(1):97-104. (In Russ.)].
15. McDermott M.L., Hazlett L.D., Barrett R.P., Lambert R.J. Viscoelastic adherence to corneal endothelium following phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24(5):678-683.
16. Фёдоров С.Н., Егорова Э.В. Ошибки и осложнения при имплантации искусственного хрусталика. М., 1992; 244 с. [Fedorov S.N., Egorova E.V. Oshibki i oslozhneniya pri implantatsii iskusstvennogo khrustalika. [Mistakes and complications of the artificial lens implantation. Moscow, 1992; 244 р. (In Russ.)].
17. Sandu Р., Stefaniu I., Zamfir C. Premature elevated intraocular pressure after cataract surgery. Oftalmologia 2001; 54(4):61-64.
18. Hildebrand G.D., Wickremasinghe S.S., Tranos P.G., Harris M.L., Little B.C. Efficacy of anterior chamber decompression in controlling early intraocular pressure spikes after uneventful phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29(6):1087-1092.
19. Merkur A., Damji K.F., Mintsioulis G., Hodge W.G. Intraocular pressure decrease after phacoemulsification in patients with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27(4):528-532.
20. Barron B.A. et al. Comprasion of the of Viscoat and Healon on postoperative intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1995; 100:377-384.
21. Fogagnolo P., Centofanti M., Figus M. et al. Short-term changes in intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. Ophtalmologika 2012; 228:154-158. doi: 10.1159/ 000337838.
22. Huang G., Lee R.Y., Kasuga T., Cui Q.N., Wang S.Y., Lin S.C. Intraocular pressure reduction after cataract extraction in normal eyes: influence of ethnicity and anterior segment parameters — response. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 42(5):508. doi: 10.1111/ ceo.12261.
23. Dooley I., Charalampidou S., Malik A., Loughman J., Molloy L., Beatty S. Changes in intraocular pressure and anterior segment morphometry after uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Eye 2010; 24(4):519-526; doi: 10.1038/eye.2009.339.
24. Mansberger S.L., Gordon M.O., Jampel H., Bhorade A., Brandt J.D., Wilson B., Kass M.A. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2012; 119(9):1826-1831. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.050.
25. Ковеленова И.В. Анализ влияния различных факторов на уровень снижения внутриглазного давления после факоэмульсификации катаракты у больных с открытоугольной глаукомой. Вестник госуниверситета Оренбурга 2010; 12:101-103. [Kovelenova I.V. Analysis of the influence of various factors on the reduction of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Bulletin of the Orenburg state University 2010; 12:101-103. (In Russ.)].
26. Chang T.C., Budenz D.L., Liu A., Kim W.I., Dang T., Li C. et al. Long-term effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure using phakic fellow eye as control. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38:866-870, doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.01.016.
27. Taibbi G., Vizzeri G. Combined surgery in the treatment of patients with cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. European Ophthalmic Review 2012; 6(4):218-221. doi: http:doi. org/10.17925/EOR.2012.06.04.218.
28. Onali T.I., Raitta. Extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber lens implantation in controlled open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 1991; 22(7):381-384.
29. Mamalis N., Lohner S., Rand A.N., Crandall A.S. Combined phacoemulsification, intraocular lens implantation, and trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 1996; 22(4):467-473.
30. Алексеев Б.Н., Ермолаев А.П. Трабекулотомия ab interno в комбинации с одномоментной экстракцией катаракты. Вестник офтальмологии 2003; 119(4):7-10. [Alekseev B.N., Ermolaev A.P. Trabeculotomy ab interno combined with extracapsular cataract extraction and IOL implantation. Vestn Oftalmol 2003; 119(4): 7-10. (In Russ.)].
31. Иванов Д.И., Быков И.Е., Катаева З.В., Бардасов Д.Б. Результаты комбинированной и двухэтапной хирургии катаракты и глаукомы. В кн.: Глаукома: Сборник научных статей. М., 2004: 356-359. [Ivanov D.I., Bykov I.E., Katayeva Z.V., Bardasov D.B. Results of the combined two-staged glaucoma and cataract surgery. Glaucoma: collection of scientific articles. Moscow, 2004; 356-359. (In Russ.)].
32. Абрамов В.Г., Жердецкий А.С., Курышева Н.И., Стрижова Е.В. К тактике хирургического лечения больных открытоугольной глаукомой и катарактой. Офтальмологический журнал 1993; 2:77-80. [Abramov V.G., Zherdetskiy A.S., Kurysheva N.I., Strizhova E.V. On the tactic of surgical treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmological J 1993; 2:77-80. (In Russ.)].
33. Егоров Е.А., Астахов Ю.С., Щуко А.Г. Национальное руководство по глаукоме. М., 2008: 85-91. [Egorov E.A. Astakhov Yu.S. Shchuko A.G. Natsional’noye rukovodstvo po glaukome. [Glaucoma national guidelines]. Moscow, 2008: 85-91. (In Russ.)].
Review
For citations:
Avetisov S.E., Erichev V.P., Kozlova I.V., Kosova J.V. Frequency of occurrence and possible causes of ophthalmic hypertension after phacoemulsification in POAG patients. National Journal glaucoma. 2017;16(3):63-69. (In Russ.)