Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Innovative technologies in combined surgery of glaucoma and complicated cataract

https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.01.09

Abstract

The review considers possible treatment tactics for patients with open-angle glaucoma and coexisting cataract. Combined treatment is recommended in the case of subcompensation of intraocular pressure (IOP) and a significant decrease in visual functions, because it allows achieving a more pronounced hypotensive effect, versus the phacoemulsification alone. The advantage of one-step intervention lies in the optimization of economic, social, psychological aspects, and shortening the patient's period of rehabilitation. In recent years, the methods of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) have become most relevant and common. The safety and technical simplicity of MIGS procedures, as well as their success in combination with phacoemulsification, ensured a widespread dissemination of these interventions. According to a number of scientific studies, the implementation of MIGS-technologies simultaneously with phacoemulsification contributes to the achievement of optimal results. The review considers the main groups of MIGS methods, presents the results of clinical studies devoted to their effectiveness. It presents the data on the efficacy of combined MIGS technologies with phacoemulsification and MIGS methods alone. There is a great interest in studying modern microinvasive methods of laser treatment in the combined treatment of patients with POAG and cataract. These operations have a minimal damaging effect on the trabecular tissue and have a pathogenetic orientation. The development of microinvasive-combined methods of treatment of POAG and complicated cataract remains an actual and promising direction.

About the Authors

V. N. Yashina
S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

M.D., Postgraduate.

59A, Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486



T. V. Sokolovskaya
S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution
Russian Federation

Ph.D., Leading Research Associate of Glaucoma Surgery Department.

59A, Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486



References

1. Marchini G. Ceruti P., Vizzari G., Berzaghi D., Zampieri A. Management of concomitant cataract and glaucoma. Dev Ophthalmol. 2017; 59:155-164. doi.org/10.1159/000458494.

2. Mantseva J.Y., Astakhov S.Y. Modern capabilities of surgical management of patients with open-angle glaucoma combined with cataract. Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2014; 6(1):47-53. (In Russ.).

3. Jiang N., Zhao G.Q., Lin J., Hu L.T., Che C.Y., Wang Q., Xu Q., Li C., Zhang J. Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of combined surgery in the management of eyes with coexisting cataract and open angle glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11(2):279-286. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.02.17.

4. Bilgin G., Karakurt A., Saricaoglu M.S. Combined non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with phacoemulsification versus non-penetrating deep sclerectomy alone. Semin Ophthalmol. 2014; 29(3):146-50. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2013.874466.

5. Malyugin B.E., Gindoyan G.N. Modern aspects of the surgical treatment of the combination of glaucoma and cataract. In: Glaucoma: problems and solutions. All-Russian conference. Moscow; 2004: 373377. (In Russ.).

6. Takhchidi Kh.P., Panteleev E.N., Bessarabov A.N., Yanovskaya N.P., Frankovska-Gerlak M.Z. Predicting early postoperative complications after simultaneous microsurgical treatment of cataract and open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery. 2009; 2:36-42. (In Russ.). doi: 617.741-089.87:617.7-007.681-089.

7. Frankovska-Gerlak M., Agafonova V.V., Yanovskaya N.P. One-step combined surgical treatment of cataract and open-angle glaucoma with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Three years of experience. New in Ophthalmology. 2013; 1:74. (In Russ.).

8. Fea A.M. Phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification with microbypass stent implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma: randomized double-masked clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(3):407-412. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.10.031.

9. Petrov S.Yu., Vostrukhin S.V., Aslamazov A.E., Sherstneva L.V. Modern methods of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. Vestn oftalmol. 2016; 3:96-102. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/oftalma2016132396-102.

10. Francis В. Trabectome combined with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone: a prospective, non-randomized controlled surgical trial. Clin Surg J Ophthalmol. 2010; 28:1-7.

11. Grieshaber M.C., Grieshaber H.R., Stegmann R. A new expander for schlemm canal surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma-interim clinical results. J Glaucoma. 2016; 25(8):657-662. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000397.

12. Kaplowitz K., Schuman J.S., Loewen N.A. Techniques and outcomes of minimally invasive trabecular ablation and bypass surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:579-585. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304256.

13. Kaplowitz K., Bussel I.I., Honkanen R., Schuman J.S., Loewen N.A. Review and meta-analysis of ab-interno trabeculectomy outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016; 100(5):594-600. doi: 10.1136/bjophthal-mol-2015-307131.

14. Cagini C. et al. Canaloplasty: current value in the management of glaucoma. J Ophthalmol. 2016; 1-6. doi: 10.1155/2016/7080475.

15. Francis B.A., Akil H., Bert B.B. Ab interno Schlemm’s Canal surgery. Dev Ophthalmol. Basel, Karger, 2017; 59:127-146. doi: 10.1159/000458492.

16. Bovee C.E., Pasquale L.R. Evolving surgical interventions in the treatment of glaucoma. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017; 32:91-95. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2016.1228393.

17. Grover D.S., Fellman R.L. Gonioscopy-assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT): thermal suture modification with a dye-stained rounded tip. J Glaucoma. 2016; 25(6):501-504. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000325.

18. Khaimi M.A. Ab interno canaloplasty. Glaucoma Today. 2015; 13: 13-15.

19. Khaimi M.A. Canaloplasty: a minimally invasive and maximally effective glaucoma treatment. J Ophthalmol. 2015:485065. doi: 2015:485065.

20. Guttman Krader C. ABiC targets all sites of outflow resistance. Ophthalmol Times. 2016; 12:35-36.

21. Korber N. Canaloplasty ab interno — a minimally invasive alternative. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2017; 234(08):991-995. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-123829/

22. Baerveldt G., Chuck R. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgical instrument and method. US Patent (2005): Available at https://www.google.com/patents/US6979328

23. Kaplowitz K., Schuman J.S., Loewen N.A. Techniques and outcomes of minimally invasive trabecular ablation and bypass surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014; 98:579-585. doi: 10.1136/bjophthal-mol-2013-304256.

24. Liu J., Jung J., Francis B.A. Ab interno trabeculotomy: TrabectomeTM surgical treatment for open-angle glaucoma. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2009; 4:119-128. doi: 10.1586/eop.09.8.

25. Theodoros Filippopoulos. New device - Trabectome is safe for trabeculectomy. New in Ophthalmology. 2010; 1:53. (In Russ.).

26. Ya-Long Dang, Xiao Wang, Wan-Wei Dai, Ping Huang, Nils A Loewen, Chun Zhang, and China Trabectome Study Group, International Tra-bectome Study Group. Two-year outcomes of ab interno trabeculectomy with the Trabectome for Chinese primary open angle glaucoma: a retrospective multicenter study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018; 11(6):945-950. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.06.08.

27. Jea S.Y., Francis B.A., Vakili G., Filippopoulos T., Rhee D.J. Ab inter-no trabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012; 119:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.06.046.

28. Nazarali S.A., Damji K.F. Ab interno trabeculectomy with Trabec-tome: outcomes in African American versus Caucasian patients. Can J Ophthalmol. 2018; 53(4):361-364. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.10.018.

29. Bussel I.I., Kaplowitz K., Schuman J.S., Loewen N.A., and Trabectome Study Group. Outcomes of ab interno trabeculectomy with the tra-bectome by degree of angle opening. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015; 99(7): 914-919. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305577.

30. Wecker T., Neuburger M., Bryniok L., Bruder K., Luebke J., Anton A., Jordan J.F. Ab interno trabeculectomy with the trabectome as a valuable therapeutic option for failed filtering blebs. J Glaucoma. 2016; 25(9):758-762. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000492.

31. Samoylenko A.I., Alekseev I.B., Beysekeeva Zh. S. A new method of combined surgery for cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2011; 2:38-43. (In Russ.).

32. Matlach J., Dhillon C., Hain J., Schlunck G., Grehn F., Klink T. Trabeculectomy versus canaloplasty (TVC study) in the treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015; 93:753-61. doi: 10.1111/aos.12722.

33. Samuelson T.W., Katz L.J., Wells J.M., Duh Y.J., Giamporcaro J.E.; US iStent Study Group. Randomized evaluation of the trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification in patients with glaucoma and cataract. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(3):459-467. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.007.

34. Craven E.R., Katz L.J., Wells J.M., Giamporcaro J.E.; iStent Study Group. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(8): 1339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025.

35. Seibold L.K., Gamett K.M., Kennedy J.B., Mulvahill M.J., Kroehl M.E., SooHoo J.R., Pantcheva M.B., Kahook M.Y. Outcomes after combined phacoemulsification and trabecular microbypass stent implantation in controlled open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016; 42(9):1332-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.07.023.

36. Pfeiffer N., Garcia-Feijoo J., Martinez-de-la-Casa J.M., Larrosa J.M., Fea A., Lemij H., Gandolfi S., Schwenn O., Lorenz K., Samuelson T.W. A randomized trial of a Schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(7):1283-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.oph-tha.2015.03.031.

37. Grierson I., Saheb H., Kahook M.Y., Johnstone M.A., Ahmed I.I., Schieber A.T., Toris C.B. A Novel Schlemm’s canal scaffold: histologic observations. J Glaucoma. 2015; 24(6):460-468. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000012.

38. Tanito M., Ikeda Y., Fujihara E. Effectiveness and safety of combined cataract surgery and microhook ab interno trabeculotomy in Japanese eyes with glaucoma: report of an initial case series. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017; 61(6):457-464. doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0531-z.

39. Tomilova E.V. Remote results of trabeculotomy ab interno performed simultaneously with cataract phacoemulsification. Practical medicine. 2016; 6:186-190. (In Russ.).

40. Ivanov D.I., Nikulin M.E., Strukov V.V. The method of one-stage surgical treatment of cataract and glaucoma by trabeculotomy ab interno and a device for its implementation. Patent RF No 2389456, 2010. (In Russ.).

41. Ivanov D.I., Nikulin M.E. Trabeculotomy ab interno as hypotensive component in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. Glaucoma. 2011; 3:34-39. (In Russ.).

42. Ivanov D.I., Nikulin M.E. Comparative analysis of the results of ab intrerno trabeculotomy and microinvasive non-penetrating deep sclerectomy in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2016; 1:52-60. (In Russ.).

43. Vera V., Ahmed I.I., Stalmans I., Reitsamer H. Gel stent implantation -recommendations for preoperative assessment, surgical technique and postoperative management. US Ophthalmic Review. 2018; 11(1): 38-46. doi: 10.17925/USOR.2018.11.1.38

44. Dapena C.L., Ros R.C. Glaucoma-filtering surgery with a XEN® collagen-based implant via the ab interno route. Revista Espanola de Glaucoma e Hipertension Ocular. 2015; 5(3):350-357.

45. Reznik A., Varma R. Ab-interno subconjunctival glaucoma implant for advanced open-angle glaucoma. in: advanced glaucoma surgery. Aref A., Varma R., eds. Springer Publ.; 2016: 51-55. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18060-1_6.

46. De Gregorio A., Pedrotti E., Russo L., Morselli S. Minimally invasive combined glaucoma and cataract surgery: clinical results of the smallest ab interno gel stent. Int Ophthalmol. 2018; 38(3):1129-1134. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0571-x.

47. Hohberger B., Welge-LuBen U.C., Lammer R. MIGS: therapeutic success of combined Xen Gel Stent implantation with cataract surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256(3):621-625. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3895-3.

48. Chaudhary A., Salinas L., Guidotti J., Mermoud A., Mansouri K. XEN Gel Implant: a new surgical approach in glaucoma. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018; 15(1):47-59. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1419060.

49. Brandao L.M., Grieshaber M.C. Update on Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) and new implants. J Ophthalmol. 2013; 2013: 705915. doi: 10.1155/2013/705915.

50. Alcon, CyPass Micro-Stent Instructions for Use, Alcon, Ft. Worth, Texas, 2016.

51. Sameh Mosaed. Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery and CyPass Micro-Stent - a new era in glaucoma surgery. US Ophthalmic Review. 2017; 10(1):39-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.17925/USOR.2017.10.01.39.

52. Vold S., Ahmed I.I., Craven E.R. et al. Two-Year COMPASS trial results: supraciliary microstenting with phacoemulsification in patients with open-angle glaucoma and cataracts. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123; 2103-2112. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.032.

53. Trubilin V.N., Caira N.A. A new combined method of one-stage phacoemulsification and vacuum trabeculoplasty ab interno. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2014; 11(1):28-37. (In Russ.).

54. Lapochkin A.V., Neroev V.V., Lapochkin V.I. A new way of surgical treatment of primary glaucoma in the eyes with cataract is fermentative trabeculocleaning. Surgical technique. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2012; 4:23-25. (In Russ.).

55. Kochergin S.A., Alexeev I.B., Daiban Taufik, Yashina L.V. The role of single-stage phacoemulsification combined with cyclodialysis «ab interno» in the treatment of cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology. 2008; 3:104-107. (In Russ.).

56. Sokolovskaya T.V., Doga A.V., Magaramov D.A., Kochetkova Y.A. Laser activation of trabeculae for the treatment of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery. 2015; 1:27-31. (In Russ.).

57. Latina M., Sibayan S., Dong H. Shin, Noecker R., Marcellino G. Q-swiched 532-nm Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty (selective laser trabeculoplasty). Ophthalmology. 1998; 105(11):2082-2090.

58. Rumyantsev A.D., Slonimsky A.Yu., Tsvetkov S.A., Estrin L.G. Activation of trabecular outflow of aqueous humor with Nd: YAG laser in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma before phacoemulsification. Cataract and refractive surgery. 2011; 11(1):36-40. (In Russ.).

59. Abrosimova E.V., Aksenov V.P., Balalin S.V., Dzhashi B.G., Serkov Yu.S. The use of selective laser trabeculoplasty and phacoemulsification of cataract in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Glaucoma news. 2016; 1:59. (In Russ.).

60. Sokolovskaya T.V., Yashina V.N. Influence of cataract phacoemulsification with the IOL implantation on the eye hydrodynamics. Practical medicine. 2017; 110(9):197-201. (In Russ.).

61.


Review

For citations:


Yashina V.N., Sokolovskaya T.V. Innovative technologies in combined surgery of glaucoma and complicated cataract. National Journal glaucoma. 2019;18(1):73-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.01.09

Views: 983


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)