Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Devices for intraocular pressure self-tonometry

https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2025-24-2-73-83

Abstract

This article provides an overview of devices self-measurement of (IOP) measurement devices, with a detailed analysis of transpalpebral tonometry techniques.

Glaucoma is a dangerous condition that can lead to blindness. Regular IOP monitoring is essential for disease management and assessment of treatment efficacy. Although IOP measurements are typically performed during ophthalmology visits, frequent in-office monitoring is not feasible for all glaucoma patients. In such cases, self-measurement becomes a vital alternative.

This review examines various devices that allow patients to measure their IOP without assistance. The following devices are discussed: Self-Tonometer, Proview Phosphene Tonometer, Ocuton tonometer, Tono-Pen and AccuPen devices, rebound tonometry devices iCare HOME and iCare HOME 2, the Triggerfish wearable IOP sensor (designed as a contact lens), and implantable sensors EyeMate IO and SC, as well as ballistic and dynamic transpalpebral tonometers. The article particularly focuses on Russian transpalpebral tonometry devices as a promising method available to a wide range of patients.

About the Authors

М. Chtioui
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenovskiy University)
Russian Federation

postgraduate student

8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991



V. I. Siplivy
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenovskiy University); Russian Scientific and Research Institute for Medical Engineering
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor; Expert

8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991;

24-16 Kashirskoe highway, Moscow, 115478



J. V. Kosova
Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

junior researcher

11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, 119021



A. E. Aslamazova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenovskiy University)
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor

8-2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119991



References

1. Brezhnev A.Yu., Egorov E.A., Erichev V.P. et al. Glaucoma "landscape" in Russia, CIS and Eastern European countries: what has changed over 15 years? RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2023;23(2):73-79. https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2023-23-2-73-79.

2. Vaajanen A., Purola P., Ojamo M. et al. Changes in incidence and severity of visual impairment due to glaucoma during 40 years — a register-based study in Finland. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100(5): 534-540. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15030.

3. Kuroyedov A.V., Movsisyan A.B., Egorov E.A. et al. The profile of patients with primaryopen-angle glaucoma in the Russian Federation (preliminary results of a multicenter population-based study). Part 1. National Journal glaucoma 2021; 20(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2021.01.01.

4. Kóthy P, Nagymihály A, Holló G. The evaluation of tonometry and selftonometry with Ocuton tonometers. Med Sci Monit 2003; 9(1):PI1-4.

5. Dabasia PL, Lawrenson JG. Evaluation of a new rebound tonometer for self-measurement of intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100(8):1139-1143. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307674.

6. Cvenkel B, Atanasovska Velkovska M. Self-monitoring of intraocular pressure using Icare HOME tonometry in clinical practice. Clin Ophthalmol 2019; 13:841-847. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S198846.

7. Astakhov S.Y., Farikova E.E., Konoplyanik K.A. The role of independent tonometry in improving the diagnosis and treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma. Oftalmologičeskie vedomosti 2019; 12(2): 41-46. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV12241-46

8. Ittoop SM, SooHoo JR, Seibold LK, Mansouri K, Kahook MY. Systematic Review of Current Devices for 24-h Intraocular Pressure Monitoring. Adv Ther 2016; 33(10):1679-1690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-016-0388-4. Epub 2016 Aug 16.

9. Koutsonas A, Walter P, Plange N. Self-tonometry with a Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Sensor in Patients With Glaucoma. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2016; 233(6):743-748. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-106191

10. Fresco BB. A new tonometer--the pressure phosphene tonometer: clinical comparison with Goldman tonometry. Ophthalmology 1998; 105(11):2123-2126. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(98)91137-x.

11. Li J. Clinical Comparison of the Proview Eye Pressure Monitor With the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and the TonoPen. Archives of Ophthalmology 2004; 122(8):1117. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.8.1117

12. Alvarez T. The Proview Phosphene Tonometer fails to measure ocular pressure accurately in clinical practice. Ophthalmology 2004; 111(6):1077-1085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.036

13. Zeimer RC, Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, et al. Application of a Self-Tonometer to Home Tonometry. Arch Ophthalmol 1986; 104(1):49-53. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1986.01050130063035

14. Collins CC. Miniature passive pressure transensor for implanting in the eye. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1967; 14(2):74-83. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.1967.4502474

15. Draeger J. Principle and clinical application of a portable applanation tonometer. Invest Ophthalmol 1967; 6(2):132-134

16. Draeger J, Groenhoff S, Hock B, Klemm M. Optimierung des automatischen Selbsttonometers durch ein akustisches Kontrollsignal und eine veränderte Fixieroptik. Ophthalmologe 1993; 90(1):54-57.

17. Draeger J, Schwartz R, Groenhoff S, Stern C. Self-tonometry under microgravity conditions. Clin Investig 1993; 71(9):700-703. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00209723

18. Greene ME, Gilman BG. Intraocular pressure measurement with instrumented contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol 1974; 13(4):299-302.

19. Kim J, Park J, Park YG, Cha E, Ku M, An HS, Lee KP, Huh MI, Kim J, Kim TS, Kim DW, Kim HK, Park JU. A soft and transparent contact lens for the wireless quantitative monitoring of intraocular pressure. Nat Biomed Eng 2021; 5(7):772-782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-021-00719-8

20. Cooper RL, Beale D. Radio telemetry of intraocular pressure in vitro. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16(2):168-171.

21. Wolbarsht ML, Wortman J, Schwartz B, Cook D. A scleral buckle pressure gauge for continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure. Int Ophthalmol 1980; 3(1):11-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136208.

22. Boles Carenini B, Brogliatti B, Tonetto C, Renis E. The Pulsair-Keeler non-contact tonometer in self-tonometry: preliminary results. Int Ophthalmol. 1992; 16(4-5):295-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00917979.

23. Bolla N, Savio E, Bellone A, Palanza L, Favero C, Brogliatti B. The Draeger autotonometer: its advantages and limits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand Suppl 1998; 227:21-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.1998.tb00868.x

24. Liang, S. Y.-W., Lee, G. A., & Shields, D. Self-tonometry in Glaucoma Management — Past, Present and Future. Survey of Ophthalmology 2009; 54(4):450-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.04.006

25. Theisen R, Scherer V, Ruprecht KW. L'autocontrôle de la tension oculaire. J Fr Ophtalmol 2001; 24(4):378-381.

26. Vogt R, Duncker GI. Anwendbarkeit der Selbsttonometrie unter ambulanten Bedingungen zur Gewinnung von Tagesprofilen des intraokularen Druckes. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2005; 222(10):814-821. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-858211

27. Theofylaktopoulos I, Diestelhorst M, Krieglstein GK. Self-tonometry with the Ocuton S versus Goldmann tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999; 237(9):720-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004170050302

28. Kupin TH, Shin DH, Juzych MS, Olivier MM, Kim C. Use of a TonoPen for long-term home tonometry. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993; 116(5): 643-644. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)73210-6

29. Kontiola A. A new electromechanical method for measuring intraocular pressure. Doc Ophthalmol 1996-1997; 93(3):265-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02569066.

30. Kontiola AI. A new induction-based impact method for measuring intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000; 78(2):142-145. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002142.x.

31. Kontiola A, Puska P. Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 242(1):3-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-003-0671-3.

32. Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46(12):4578-4580. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.05-0586.

33. Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J. Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008; 17(1):43-47. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e318133fb32.

34. Krolo I, Mihaljevic B, Kasumovic A, Bagatin F, Ravlic MM, Herman JS. Rebound Tonometry over Soft Contact Lenses. Acta Inform Med 2020; 28(3):185-189. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2020.28.185-189.

35. Quérat L, Chen E. Impact of self-tonometry on glaucoma treatment decision. Acta Ophthalmol 2023; 101(2):e246-e251. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15256.

36. Liu J, De Francesco T, Schlenker M, Ahmed II. Icare Home Tonometer: A Review of Characteristics and Clinical Utility. Clin Ophthalmol 2020; 14:4031-4045. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S284844.

37. Chen X, Wu X, Lin X, Wang J, Xu W. Outcome, influence factor and development of CLS measurement in continuous IOP monitoring: A narrative review. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2021; 44(4):101376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2020.10.006.

38. Dunbar GE, Shen BY, Aref AA. The Sensimed Triggerfish contact lens sensor: efficacy, safety, and patient perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol 2017; 11:875-882. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S109708.

39. Hollo G, Kothy P, Vargha P. Evaluation of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring for assessment of prostaglandin-induced pressure reduction in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2014; 23(1):e6-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e31829e5635.

40. Koutsonas A, Walter P, Roessler G, et al. Implantation of a novel telemetric intraocular pressure sensor in patients with glaucoma (ARGOS study): 1-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56:1063-1069. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.14-14925

41. Koutsonas A, Walter P, Roessler G, Plange N. Long-term follow-up after implantation of a telemetric intraocular pressure sensor in patients with glaucoma: a safety report. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018; 46(5):473-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.13100.

42. Choritz L, Mansouri K, van den Bosch J, Weigel M, Dick HB, Wagner M, Thieme H; ARGOS study group. Telemetric Measurement of Intraocular Pressure via an Implantable Pressure Sensor-12-Month Results from the ARGOS-02 Trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2020; 209:187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.09.011.

43. Szurman P, Mansouri K, Dick HB, Mermoud A, Hoffmann EM, Mackert M, Weinreb RN, Rao HL, Seuthe AM; EYEMATE-SC study group. Safety and performance of a suprachoroidal sensor for telemetric measurement of intraocular pressure in the EYEMATE-SC trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2023; 107(4):518-524. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320023.

44. Nesterov A. P., Illarionova A.R., Obruch B.V. New transpalpebral tonometer TGDC-01 diaton. Vestnik oftal'mologii 2007; 123(1): 42-44.

45. Dykin V. I., Ivanishchev K. V., Kornev N. P. et al. Dynamic type intraocular pressure tonometer. Meditsinskaya Tekhnika 2013; 279(3): 18-20.

46. Avetisov, S.E, Erichev V.P., Antonov A.A. Diagnostic capabilities of transpalpebral tonometry with the IGD-03 indicator. National journal glaucoma 2016; 15(3):17-23.

47. Avetisov, S.E, Erichev V.P., Antonov A.A. Comparative study of transpalpebral method, applanation tonometry and bidirectional corneal pneumoaplanation. Modern technologies in ophthalmology 2014; 3: 119-121.

48. Wisse RP, Peeters N, Imhof SM, van der Lelij A. Comparison of Diaton transpalpebral tonometer with applanation tonometry in keratoconus. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9(3):395-358. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2016.03.12.

49. Alzuhairy S. Transpalpebral intraocular pressure measurement by Diaton compared to Goldman applanation tonometer in myopic eyes before and after transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy in Saudi Arabia. Int J Ophthalmol 2023; 16(3):375-381. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2023.03.07.

50. Risma JM, Tehrani S, Wang K, Fingert JH, Alward WL, Kwon YH. The Utility of Diaton Tonometer Measurements in Patients With Ocular Hypertension, Glaucoma, and Glaucoma Tube Shunts: A Preliminary Study for its Potential Use in Keratoprosthesis Patients. J Glaucoma 2016; 25(8):643-647. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000394.

51. Li Y, Shi J, Duan X, Fan F. Transpalpebral measurement of intraocular pressure using the Diaton tonometer versus standard Goldmann applanation tonometry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248(12):1765-1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-009-1243-y.

52. Egorov E.A., Romanova T.B., Kats D.V. et al. Transpalpebral tonometry — a promising method for monitoring intraocular pressure. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2016; 16(2):75-78.

53. Filippova O.M., Bessmertny A.M., Kuzin M.N., Petrov S.Yu. Prospects for the use of the TVGD-02 tonometer for assisted monitoring of intraocular pressure in home practice. Russian Ophthalmological Journal 2021; 14(2):27-35. https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2021-14-2-27-35.

54. Filippova O.M., Bessmertny A.M., Kuzin M.N., Petrov S.Yu. Prospects for monitoring intraocular pressure using transpalpebral tonometry. Medicine 2022; 10(2):10-24. https://doi.org/10.29234/2308-9113-2022-10-2-10-24.

55. Berg C, Doniger SJ, Zaia B, Williams SR. Change in intraocular pressure during point-of-care ultrasound. West J Emerg Med 2015; 16(2): 263-268. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24150.


Review

For citations:


Chtioui М., Siplivy V.I., Kosova J.V., Aslamazova A.E. Devices for intraocular pressure self-tonometry. National Journal glaucoma. 2025;24(2):73-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2025-24-2-73-83

Views: 101


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)