Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Efficacy and safety profile of generic IOP-lowering agents

Abstract

AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of Prolatan in terms of hypotensive effect, dynamic changes in functional tests, and adverse reactions.

METHODS: 60 patients newly diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were randomized into two groups. In group 1 (n=36), Xalatan® once daily was prescribed. In group 2 (n=38), Prolatan once daily was prescribed. IOP (IOPcc) was measured using Reichert® 7 Auto Tonometer at baseline and week 2, 6, and 12. Functional tests (i.e., mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, RNFL Thickness, Rim Area, Disc Area, Cup Volume, and Average Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness) were performed at the enrollment and by the end of week 12. Adverse reactions were reported at every step.

RESULTS: 12-week treatment with Xalatan® and Prolatan resulted in IOP lowering by 30% and 31%, respectively, as compared with baseline level (P0). Maximum hypotensive effect was observed after 6 weeks (31% and 34%, respectively). By week 12, insignificant IOP rising (by 29% and 32%, respectively) as compared with baseline level was observed. Therefore, IOP-lowering efficacy of these agents is similar. By the end of week 12, visual acuity improved in Prolatan group (p<0.05) while mean deviation and pattern standard deviation improved in both groups (p<0.05). Average RNFL Thickness improved in Xalatan® group while disc area and average Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness improved in Prolatan group. In general, other parameters improved as well, however, these changes were less significant. After 2 weeks of the treatment, 2 patients of group I and 4 patients of group II complained of ocular discomfort and mild conjunctival hyperemia. By the end of week 12, none of these adverse reactions were reported. Neither systemic adverse reactions nor treatment discontinuation were reported.

CONCLUSIONS: Prolatan is similar to original latanoprost in terms of hypotensive effect and reduces IOP in POAG by, on average, 30% as compared with baseline level. IOPlowering effect is accompanied by indirect neuroprotection illustrated by the improvement of functional tests. This agent is characterized by minor topical adverse reactions. Prolatan may be recommended for POAG to reduce IOP. 

About the Authors

S. Yu. Petrov
The Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Ph.D., Leading Research Associate of the Glaucoma Department,

11А Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



A. S. Makarova
The Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Ph.D., Research Associate of the Glaucoma Department,

11А Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



A. V. Volzhanin
The Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

resident,

11А Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



References

1. Quigley H.A., Broman A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Brit J Ophthalmol 2006; 90(3): 262-267.

2. Resnikoff S., Pascolini D., Etya’ale D., Kocur I. et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2004; 82(11):844-851.

3. Osborne N.N., Chidlow G., Wood J., Casson R. Some current ideas on the pathogenesis and the role of neuroprotection in glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Eur J Ophthalmol 2003; 13(Suppl 3):19-26.

4. Bonomi L. Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica Scand Suppl 2002; 236:11-13.

5. Tielsch J.M., Sommer A., Katz J., Royall R.M. et al. Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Jama 1991; 266(3):369-374.

6. Friedman D.S., Wolfs R.C., O’Colmain B.J., Klein B.E. et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004; 122(4):532-538.

7. Hunter D.J. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nature Reviews Genetics 2005; 6(4):287-298.

8. Anderson D.R., Drance S.M., Schulzer M., Collaborative NormalTension Glaucoma Study G. Factors that predict the benefit of lowering intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136(5):820-829.

9. Armaly M.F., Krueger D.E., Maunder L., Becker B. et al. Biostatistical analysis of the collaborative glaucoma study. I. Summary report of the risk factors for glaucomatous visual-field defects. Arch Ophthalmol 1980; 98(12):2163-2171

10. Heijl A., Leske M.C., Bengtsson B., Hyman L. et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120(10):1268-1279.

11. Национальное руководство по глаукоме для практикующих врачей. 3-е издание. Под ред. Е.А. Егорова, Ю.С. Астахова, В.П. Еричева. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2015; 452 c. [Natsional’noe rukovodstvo po glaukome dlya praktikuyuschikh vrachei. 3-e izdanie [National guidelines of glaucoma for practicing doctors. 3rd edition]. Ed. by E.A. Egorov, Yu.S. Astakhov, V.P. Erichev. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2015. 452 p. (In Russ.)].

12. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma (4rd edition). 2014; 195 p.

13. Еричев В.П., Дугина А.Е., Мазурова Ю.В. Фиксированные лекарственные формы: современный подход к терапии глаукомы. Глаукома 2010; 1:62-65. [Erichev V.P., Dugina A.E., Mazurova Yu.V. Fixed combinations in glaucoma treatment: particular case. Glaucoma 2010; 1:62-65. (In Russ.)].

14. Еричев В.П., Козлова И.В., Цзинь Д.Д., Рещикова В.С., Макарова А.С. Фиксированная комбинация латанопроста и тимолола малеата в лечении пациентов c первичной открытоугольной глаукомой. Национальный журнал глаукома 2015; 14(1):37-43. [Erichev V.P., Kozlova I.V., Tszin Dan Dan, Reschikova V.S., Makarova A.S. Fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol maleate in treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2015; 14(1):37-43. (In Russ.)].

15. Куроедов А.В., Брежнев А.Ю., Александров А.С., Огородникова В.Ю. Принципы лечения начальной стадии глаукомы: хирургия против терапии (обзор литературы). Военно-медицинский журнал 2011; 332(5):28-35. [Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu., Aleksandrov A.S., Ogorodnikova V.Yu. Principles of treatment of earlystage glaucoma: Surgery vs. Therapy (Review of literature). Voenno-meditsinskiy zhurnal 2011; 332(5):28-35. (In Russ.)].

16. Куроедов А.В., Брежнев А.Ю., Александров А.С. Как понизить уровень внутриглазного давления на 30% у пациентов с глаукомой (обзор литературы). Военно-медицинский журнал 2009; 330(6):40-46. [Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu., Aleksandrov A.S. Principles of reduction of ophthalmotonous pressure on 30% by the patients with glaucoma (Review of literature). Voennomeditsinskiy zhurnal 2009; 330(6):40-46. (In Russ.)].

17. Бондарева И.Б., Жердев В.П., Кукес В.Г., Леонова М.В., Раменская Г.В., Сариев А.К. и др. Проведение качественных исследований биоэквивалентности лекарственных препаратов. Клиническая фармакокинетика 2005; 1(2):2-14. [Bondareva I.B., Zherdev V.P., Kukes V.G., Leonova M.V., Ramenskaya G.V., Sariev A.K. et al. Performing a qualitative study of drug bioequivalence. Klinicheskaya farmakokinetika 2005; 1(2):2-14. (In Russ.)].

18. Егоров А.Е. Оригинальные препараты и дженерики в лечении глаукомы. РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология 2015; 2(15):82-84. [Egorov A.E. Original drugs and generics in glaucoma treatment. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2015; 2(15):82-84. (In Russ.)].

19. Куроедов А.В., Огородникова В.Ю., Александрова Л.А. Так ли важна проблема дженериков в глаукоматологии? Всероссийская школа офтальмологов, 11-я: Сборник научных трудов. М., 2012; 85-88. [Kuroyedov A.V., Ogorodnikova V.Yu., Aleksandrova L.A. Is the problem of generics in glaucomatology so important? All-Russian ophthalmology school, the 11th: collection of scientific articles. Moscow, 2012; 85-88. (In Russ.)].

20. Ловпаче Д.Н., Киселева Т.Н., Рамазанова К.А. Опыт применения аналога простагландина препарата глаупрост 0,005% при лечении первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Возможности его комбинации с другими препаратами. Российский офтальмологический журнал 2012; 1:42-45. [Lovpache D.N., Kiseleva T.N., Ramazanova K.A. The use of Glauprost 0,005%, a prostaglandin analogue, in the treatment of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and its potentials for combined therapy. Russian Ophthalmological Journal 2012; 1:42-45. (In Russ.)].

21. Алексеев И.Б., Мельникова Н.В. Сравнительный анализ применения глаупроста 0,005% и ксалатана 0,005% у пациентов с первичной открытоугольной глаукомой. Национальный журнал глаукома 2013; 1:44-47. [Alekseev I.B., Melnikova N.V. Comparative analysis of glauprost 0.005% and xalatan 0.005% administration in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2013; 1:44-47. (In Russ.)].

22. Ходжаев Н.С., Черных В.В., Трунов А.Н. Особенности иммунобиохимических изменений у больных с ПОУГ на фоне монотерапии аналогом простагландина Глаупростом. РМЖ Клиническая офтальмология 2013; 2:55-57. [Khodzhaev N.S., Chernykh V.V., Trunov A.N. Peculiarities of immune and biochemical mechanisms in patients with POAG on the background of monotherapy with prostaglandin analogue Glauprost. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2013; 2:55-57. (In Russ.)].

23. Алексеев В.Н., Левко М.А., Калакхири М. Сравнение эффективности и безопасности применения Ксалатамакса и Ксалатана при их применении в качестве монотерапии открытоугольной глаукомы. Российский офтальмологический журнал 2013; 4(1):11-15. [Alekseev V.N., Levko M.A., Kalakhiri M. Efficacy and safety comparison of Xalatamax and Xalatan at their use as openangle glaucoma monotherapy. Russian Ophthalmological Journal 2013; 4(1):11-15. (In Russ.)].

24. Егоров Е.А., Селезнев А.В. Пролатан® (латанопрост 0,005%) в лечении первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология 2015; 1:11-15. [Egorov E.A., Seleznev A.V. Prolaran® (latanoprost 0.005%) in treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2015; 1:11-15. (In Russ.)].

25. Golan S., Rosenfeld E., Shemesh G., Kurtz S. Original and generic latanoprost for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: are they really the same? Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2015; 42(2):220-224.

26. Digiuni M., Manni G., Vetrugno M., Uva M., Milano G., Orzalesi N., Fogagnolo P., Centofanti M., Campos E., Rossetti L. An evaluation of therapeutic noninferiority of 0.005% latanoprost ophthalmic solution and xalatan in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma 2013; 22(9):707-712.

27. Огородникова В.Ю., Нефедов Н.А., Александрова Л.А., Куроедов А.В. Пилотное исследование клинической эффективности различных дженериков латанопроста 0,005% при их применении у пациентов с первичной открытоугольной глаукомой. РМЖ. Клиническая офтальмология 2014; 3:139-142. [Ogorodnikova V.Yu., Nefedov N.A., Aleksandrova L.A., Kuroyedov A.V. А pilot study of clinical efficiency of different latanoprost 0,005% generics in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2014; 3:139-142. (In Russ.)].


Review

For citations:


Petrov S.Yu., Makarova A.S., Volzhanin A.V. Efficacy and safety profile of generic IOP-lowering agents. National Journal glaucoma. 2017;16(2):27-36. (In Russ.)

Views: 943


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)