Comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma treatment regimens for patients with disease progression characteristics. Part 2. The efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment regimens
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment strategies in patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma in order to predict glaucoma progression or lack thereof.
METHODS: This combined analytical scientific and clinical multicenter study was conducted between January and April 2017. A total of 136 participants (237 eyes) from 30 academic referral centers from 6 (six) countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Uzbekistan) — 52 (38.2%) males and 84 (61.8%) females — were included into the study. Glaucoma anamnesis and all treatment regimens were evaluated retrospectively. The study of treatment regimens included the assessment of the effectiveness of topical medication, laser and surgical treatment. Four (4) successive regimen changes were analyzed, each of them with no less than three (3) months duration.
RESULTS: The research team has established that the quantity of treatment regimens rises with each next regimen change: from 14 regimens at baseline to 30 regimens at the third adjustment. Prostaglandin analogues (PGA) and beta-blockers (BB) monotherapy were used as baseline first-choice therapy in 37.6% and 21.5% of cases respectively (66.2% in total). Fixed or unfixed combinations with PGA and BB were preferred in 16.5% of cases, BB and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI) combination — in 8.4% of cases.
The combination therapy with CAI at the start has achieved the most prominent reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) (till 33.9%). The first choice monotherapy with BB or PGA led to a more effective IOP reduction compared to fixed or unfixed combinations of these drugs: BB reduced the IOP level by 20.0% from baseline, PGA — by 23.1%, their combination — by 19.2%. We have established an intensive use of combination therapy, starting with the 2nd regimen — 71.3%. The laser and surgical treatment was used as initial treatment in 0.8% and 2.1% respectively and achieved 26.7% and 46.0% prevalence respectively by the a final regimen.
We achieved the most prominent IOP reduction (by 37.1%) in regimens No 3 and No 4 that included trabeculectomy.
CONCLUSION: The results show that the tactics of managing patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma is changing in favor of prescribing first-choice monotherapy medicines — PGA. The choice of therapy tactics for patients with moderate and advanced glaucoma remains irrational: laser and surgical treatment becomes relevant only in regimens No 3 and No 4, 3-4 years after the diagnosis of the disease.
About the Authors
R. V. AvdeevRussian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Head of Department
10, Studencheskaya St., Voronezh, Russian Federation, 394036;
A. S. Alexandrov
Russian Federation
M.D., Med.Sc.D., Associate Professor
8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014
N. A. Bakunina
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
8, Leninskij prospect, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119049;
D. A. Belaya
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
Murmansk, 6, Akademika Pavlova St., Murmansk, Russian Federation, 183047;
A. Yu. Brezhnev
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor
3, Karla Marksa St., Kursk, Russian Federation, 305041;
A. V. Volzhanin
Russian Federation
postgraduate
11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021;
N. V. Volkova
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor
337, Lermontova St., Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664017;
L. M. Gabdrakhmanov
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
158, Novo-Sadovaya St., Samara, Russian Federation, 443068;
I. R. Gazizova
Russian Federation
M.D., Med.Sc.D., Head of Clinical Department
41 Kirochnaya St., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191015;
A. B. Galimova
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
67 Rikharda Zorge St., Ufa, Russian Federation, 450075;
V. V. Garkavenko
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
1 Partizana Zheleznyaka St., Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660022;
A. M. Getmanova
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
86 Prospekt Stanke Dimitrova, Bryansk, Russian Federation, 241028;
V. V. Gorodnichy
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014;
A. A. Gusarevitch
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Head of Clinical Center
2a Vladimirovsky Spusk, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630003;
D. A. Dorofeev
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
287, Pr. Pobedy, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454021;
Y. F. Dyukareva
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
7/1 Medynskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117546;
P. Ch. Zavadsky
Belarus
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
5A Klumova St., Minsk, Republic of Belarus, 220070;
A. B. Zakhidov
Uzbekistan
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
32 1st Proezd Alimkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 100123;
O. G. Zvereva
Russian Federation
Head of Glaucoma consultation
14 Butlerova St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012;
36 Butlerova St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012;
U. R. Karimov
Uzbekistan
Ph.D., ophthalmologist
1 Islama Karimova St., Gulistan, Uzbekistan, 200120;
I. V. Kondrakova
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014;
A. V. Kuroyedov
Russian Federation
M.D., Med.Sc.D., Professor, Head of Ophthalmology Department
8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014;
1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997;
S. N. Lanin
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Head of the Clinical Department
1v Nikitina St., Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660022
Dzh. N. Lovpache
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor
14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062;
E. V. Molchanova
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor
12 Lenina St., Omsk, Russian Federation, 644099;
Z. M. Nagornova
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
8 Sheremetyevsky Prosp., Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153005;
O. N. Onufriychuk
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist
38 Mokhovaya St., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191028;
S. Yu. Petrov
Russian Federation
M.D., Med.Sc.D., Leading Research Associate of the Glaucoma Department
11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021;
Yu. I. Rozhko
Belarus
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor
290 Ilyicha St., Gomel, Republic of Belarus, 246040;
Zh. O. Sangilbayeva
Kazakhstan
ophthalmologist
95 Tole bi St, Аlmaty, Каzahstan;
A. V. Seleznev
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor
8 Sheremetyevsky Prosp., Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153005;
L. B. Tashtitova
Kazakhstan
ophthalmologist
95 Tole bi St, Аlmaty, Каzahstan;
S. V. Usmanov
Russian Federation
ophthalmologist
14 Butlerova St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012;
A. S. Khohlova
Russian Federation
Head of the clinical department
131 Svetlanskaya St., Vladivostok, Russian Federation, 690001;
A. P. Shakhalova
Russian Federation
M.D., Ph.D., Head of the clinical department
38 Belinskogo St., Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603000;
R. V. Sevciuc
Moldova, Republic of
Head of the clinical department
1 T. Chorbe St., Chisinau, MD 421, Moldova
References
1. Kuroyedov A.V., Golubev S.Yu., Shafranov G.V. Investigation of morphometric criteria of the optic disc in the light of the possibilities of laser diagnostic equipment. Glaucoma. 2005; 2:7-19. (In Russ.).
2. Liebman E.S. Epidemiological characteristics of glaucoma. Glaucoma. 2009; 1:2-3. (In Russ.).
3. Kuroedov A.V. Pharmacoeconomic approaches to the treatment of patients with glaucoma. Oftalmologic vedomosti. 2010; 1:51-62. (In Russ.).
4. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Y.S., Erichev V.P. Nacional’noe rukovodstvo po glaukome dlja praktikujushhih vrachej. [National glaucoma guidelines for practicing doctors]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2015; 452 p. (In Russ.).
5. Petrov S.Y., Makarova A.S., Volzhanin A.V. Efficacy and safety profile of generic IOP-lowering agents. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(2):27-36. (In Russ.).
6. Kwon Y.H., Fingert J.H., Kuehn M.H., Alward W.L. Primary openangle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(11):1113–1124.
7. Nesterov A.P. Glaukoma. [Glaucoma]. M.: Medical News Agency Publ., 2008. 360 p. (In Russ.).
8. Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu. The duration of the hypotensive action of anti-glaucoma medicines. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016; 4:214-219. (In Russ.).
9. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Prediction of the disease duration and the age of patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma changes. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2014; 2:60-69. (In Russ.).
10. Petrov S.Yu., Volzhanin A.V. A review of the clinical experience of the therapy of glaucoma and ophthalmic hypertension with a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol. RMJ. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017; 17(2):100-106. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-2-100-106.
11. Petrov S.Y., Antonov A.A., Makarova A.S., Savel’eva T.A., Loshchenov V.B. The effect of conjunctival flap type in primary trabeculectomy on surgical site oxygen metabolism and the hypotensive effect of the operation. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(1):64-75. (In Russ.).
12. Erichev V.P., Petrov S.Y., Antonov A.A., Volzhanin A.V. International standards of clinical trials in glaucoma surgery. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2016; 15(2):102-112. (In Russ.).
13. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Basinskiy A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu. et al. Multicenter study of intraocular pressure level in patients with moderate and advanced primary openangle glaucoma on treatment. Oftalmologic vedomosti. 2015; 8(1): 43-60. doi: 10.17816/OV2015143-60.
14. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma (4rd edition). 2014; 195 p.
15. Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W., Lichter P.R. et al. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(2):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051.
16. Lichter P.R., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W. et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(11):1943-1953.
17. Bengtsson B., Leske M.C., Hyman L., Heijl A. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(2):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.060.
18. Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volkov E.N. et al. Risk factors, pathogenetic factors in progression of glaucoma by results of multicenter study of Russian glaucoma society. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2012; 2:57-69. (In Russ.).
19. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volkov E.N. et al. Clinical multicenter study of trabeculectomy efficacy. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2013; 2:53-60. (In Russ.).
20. Whitson J.T., Realini T., Nguyen Q.H., McMenemy M.G., Goode S.M. Six-month results from a Phase III randomized trial of fixed-combination brinzolamide 1% + brimonidine 0.2% versus brinzolamide or brimonidine monotherapy in glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Clinical Ophthalmology. (Auckland, NZ) 2013; 7:1053-1060. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S46881.
21. Harasymowycz P., Birt C., Gooi P. et al. Medical Management of Glaucoma in the 21st Century from a Canadian Perspective. J Ophthalmology. 2016; 2016:6509809. doi: 10.1155/2016/6509809.
22. Higginbotham E.J. Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2010; 4:1-9.
23. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S., Brezhnev A.Yu., Gazizova I.R. et al. Structural and functional diagnostic criteria in assessing the probability of suspected glaucoma and the early-stage glaucoma. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2017; 1:103-117. (In Russ.).
24. Listopadova N.A., Tugushi O.A., Agalakova et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of long-term monotherapy with the beta-blockers and adjunctive therapy with prostaglandins in primary open-angle glaucoma. Glaukoma. 2008; 7(4):17-19. (In Russ.).
25. Rozhko Yu.I., Skavronska E.V., Logosh M.V., Karpovich N.V., Solodovnikova N.G. Efficacy and tolerability of the combined drug Duotrav in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Recipe. 2009; 2:104-107. (In Russ.).
26. Lovpache Dzh.N., Dorofeev D.A. Pharmacoeconomic expediency of the use of non-conservative therapy in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with the «dry eye» syndrome (intermediate results). RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017; 18(4):195-200. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-4-195-200.
27. Rozhko Yu.I., Marchenko L.N. 2 year experience of usage of fixed combination of 1% brinzolamide and 0.5% timolol in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2011; 4:132-135. (In Russ.).
28. Inoue K., Okayama R., Higa R. Assessment of ocular hypotensive effect and safety 12 months after changing from an unfixed combination to a latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2012; 6:607-612. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S30611.
29. Alm A., Grunden J.W., Kwok K.K. Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20(4):215-222.
30. Kuroedov A.V., Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma: the age at which the patient and duration of disease which may occur blindness. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2014; 2:74-84. (In Russ.).
31. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Multicenter study of intraocular pressure level in patients with moderate and advanced primary open-angle glaucoma on treatment. Ophthalmologic vedomosti. 2015; 1:52-69. (In Russ.).
32. Abysheva L.D., Aleksandrov A.S., Arapiev M.U. Ardzheneshvily T.D., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S. et al. Optimization of diagnosis and treatment options in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2016; 15(2):19-35. (In Russ.).
33. Kuroyedov A., Avdeev R., Alexandrov A., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Projected age of patients and disease duration for intensive therapeutic and prophylactic actions in primary glaucoma. Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2014; 3:59-71. (In Russ.).
34. Kuroyedov A., Abysheva L., Avdeev R., Alexandrov A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Medico-economic multicenter study of local hypotensive therapy efficacy and cost for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in CIS. Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2015; 3:35-51. (In Russ.).
35. Kuroyedov A., Abysheva L., Avdeev R., Alexandrov A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Intraocular pressure level in various local hypotensive therapy in primary open-angle glaucoma (multicenter study). Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2016; 6(1):27-42. (In Russ.).
36. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Arapiev M.U., Bakunina N.A., Basinskiy A.S., Belaya D.A. et al. Suspected glaucoma and early stage glaucoma: differential diagnostic criteria. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2017; 10(4):5-15. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-4-5-15. (In Russ.).
37. Kuroedov A.V., Abysheva L.D., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S. et al. Management of primary open-angle glaucoma in practice: variants of medical, laser and surgical treatment. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2016; 1:170-185. (In Russ.).
38. Kuroyedov A.V., Nagornova Z.M., Seleznev A.V., Zavadskiy P.Ch., Brezhnev A.Yu., Petrov S.Yu. Influence of different local hypotensive therapy regimens on the development and progression of the «dry eye» syndrome. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(3):71-80. (In Russ.).
39. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Belaya D.A., Brezhnev A.Yu. et al. Comparison of treatment regimens for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with signs of disease progression. Part 1. IOP levels. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2018; 17(1):14-28. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Belaya D.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volzhanin A.V., Volkova N.V., Gabdrakhmanov L.M., Gazizova I.R., Galimova A.B., Garkavenko V.V., Getmanova A.M., Gorodnichy V.V., Gusarevitch A.A., Dorofeev D.A., Dyukareva Y.F., Zavadsky P.Ch., Zakhidov A.B., Zvereva O.G., Karimov U.R., Kondrakova I.V., Kuroyedov A.V., Lanin S.N., Lovpache D.N., Molchanova E.V., Nagornova Z.M., Onufriychuk O.N., Petrov S.Yu., Rozhko Yu.I., Sangilbayeva Zh.O., Seleznev A.V., Tashtitova L.B., Usmanov S.V., Khohlova A.S., Shakhalova A.P., Sevciuc R.V. Comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma treatment regimens for patients with disease progression characteristics. Part 2. The efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment regimens. National Journal glaucoma. 2018;17(2):65-83. (In Russ.)