Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma treatment regimens for patients with disease progression characteristics. Part 2. The efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment regimens

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment strategies in patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma in order to predict glaucoma progression or lack thereof.
METHODS: This combined analytical scientific and clinical multicenter study was conducted between January and April 2017. A total of 136 participants (237 eyes) from 30 academic referral centers from 6 (six) countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Uzbekistan) — 52 (38.2%) males and 84 (61.8%) females — were included into the study. Glaucoma anamnesis and all treatment regimens were evaluated retrospectively. The study of treatment regimens included the assessment of the effectiveness of topical medication, laser and surgical treatment. Four (4) successive regimen changes were analyzed, each of them with no less than three (3) months duration.
RESULTS: The research team has established that the quantity of treatment regimens rises with each next regimen change: from 14 regimens at baseline to 30 regimens at the third adjustment. Prostaglandin analogues (PGA) and beta-blockers (BB) monotherapy were used as baseline first-choice therapy in 37.6% and 21.5% of cases respectively (66.2% in total). Fixed or unfixed combinations with PGA and BB were preferred in 16.5% of cases, BB and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAI) combination — in 8.4% of cases.
The combination therapy with CAI at the start has achieved the most prominent reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) (till 33.9%). The first choice monotherapy with BB or PGA led to a more effective IOP reduction compared to fixed or unfixed combinations of these drugs: BB reduced the IOP level by 20.0% from baseline, PGA — by 23.1%, their combination — by 19.2%. We have established an intensive use of combination therapy, starting with the 2nd regimen — 71.3%. The laser and surgical treatment was used as initial treatment in 0.8% and 2.1% respectively and achieved 26.7% and 46.0% prevalence respectively by the a final regimen.
We achieved the most prominent IOP reduction (by 37.1%) in regimens No 3 and No 4 that included trabeculectomy.
CONCLUSION: The results show that the tactics of managing patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma is changing in favor of prescribing first-choice monotherapy medicines — PGA. The choice of therapy tactics for patients with moderate and advanced glaucoma remains irrational: laser and surgical treatment becomes relevant only in regimens No 3 and No 4, 3-4 years after the diagnosis of the disease.

About the Authors

R. V. Avdeev
Voronezh Burdenko State Medical Academy
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Head of Department

10, Studencheskaya St., Voronezh, Russian Federation, 394036;



A. S. Alexandrov
Mandryka Military Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

M.D., Med.Sc.D., Associate Professor

8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014



N. A. Bakunina
Pirogov City State Clinical Hospital No 1
Russian Federation

 M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

 8, Leninskij prospect, Moscow, Russian Federation, 119049;



D. A. Belaya
P.A. Bayandin Regional Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

Murmansk, 6, Akademika Pavlova St., Murmansk, Russian Federation, 183047;



A. Yu. Brezhnev
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor

3, Karla Marksa St., Kursk, Russian Federation, 305041;

 



A. V. Volzhanin
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

postgraduate

11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021;



N. V. Volkova
S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Center
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor

337, Lermontova St., Irkutsk, Russian Federation, 664017;



L. M. Gabdrakhmanov
Eroshevsky Samara Regional Clinical Ophthalmologic Hospital
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

158, Novo-Sadovaya St., Samara, Russian Federation, 443068;



I. R. Gazizova
Mechnikov North-West Federal Medical and Research University
Russian Federation

M.D., Med.Sc.D., Head of Clinical Department

41 Kirochnaya St., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191015;



A. B. Galimova
Russian Eye and Plastic Surgery Center
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

67 Rikharda Zorge St., Ufa, Russian Federation, 450075;



V. V. Garkavenko
Voyno-Yasenetsky State Medical University
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

1 Partizana Zheleznyaka St., Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660022;



A. M. Getmanova
Regional Eye Hospital No 1
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

86 Prospekt Stanke Dimitrova, Bryansk, Russian Federation, 241028;



V. V. Gorodnichy
Mandryka Military Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014;



A. A. Gusarevitch
Regional Railway Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Head of Clinical Center

2a Vladimirovsky Spusk, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630003;



D. A. Dorofeev
Regional Ophthalmology Clinical Hospital No 3
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

287, Pr. Pobedy, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation, 454021;



Y. F. Dyukareva
State budgetary health care institution city polyclinic 52 Moscow City Health Department
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

7/1 Medynskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117546;



P. Ch. Zavadsky
Medical Center «New Vision»
Belarus

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

5A Klumova St., Minsk, Republic of Belarus, 220070;



A. B. Zakhidov
Ophthalmosurgery Center «SAIF-OPTIMA»
Uzbekistan

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

32 1st Proezd Alimkent, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 100123;



O. G. Zvereva
State Tatarstan Republican Hospital; State Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Head of Glaucoma consultation

14 Butlerova St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012;
36 Butlerova St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012;



U. R. Karimov
Gulistan Kuz, Ophthalmology Hospital
Uzbekistan

Ph.D., ophthalmologist

1 Islama Karimova St., Gulistan, Uzbekistan, 200120;



I. V. Kondrakova
Mandryka Military Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014;



A. V. Kuroyedov
Mandryka Military Clinical Hospital; Pirogov State National Medical University, Ophthalmology Department
Russian Federation

M.D., Med.Sc.D., Professor, Head of Ophthalmology Department

8A, Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 107014;
1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 117997;



S. N. Lanin
Makarov State Ophthalmology Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Head of the Clinical Department

1v Nikitina St., Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660022



Dzh. N. Lovpache
Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor

14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062;



E. V. Molchanova
Omsk State Medical Academy
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor

12 Lenina St., Omsk, Russian Federation, 644099;



Z. M. Nagornova
Ivanovo State Medical Academy
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

8 Sheremetyevsky Prosp., Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153005;



O. N. Onufriychuk
Ophthalmic Diagnostic City Center №7
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., ophthalmologist

38 Mokhovaya St., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 191028;



S. Yu. Petrov
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

M.D., Med.Sc.D., Leading Research Associate of the Glaucoma Department

11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 119021;



Yu. I. Rozhko
State Establishment «Republican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology»
Belarus

M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor

290 Ilyicha St., Gomel, Republic of Belarus, 246040;



Zh. O. Sangilbayeva
Kazakh Scientific-research institute of eye diseases
Kazakhstan

ophthalmologist

95 Tole bi St, Аlmaty, Каzahstan;



A. V. Seleznev
Ivanovo State Medical Academy
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor

8 Sheremetyevsky Prosp., Ivanovo, Russian Federation, 153005;



L. B. Tashtitova
Kazakh Scientific-research institute of eye diseases
Kazakhstan

ophthalmologist

95 Tole bi St, Аlmaty, Каzahstan;



S. V. Usmanov
State Tatarstan Republican Hospital
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist

14 Butlerova St., Kazan, Russian Federation, 420012;



A. S. Khohlova
Pacific State Medical University
Russian Federation

Head of the clinical department

131 Svetlanskaya St., Vladivostok, Russian Federation, 690001;



A. P. Shakhalova
Medical Clinical Center «Tonus Amaris»
Russian Federation

M.D., Ph.D., Head of the clinical department

38 Belinskogo St., Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603000;



R. V. Sevciuc
State Health Institution «Institute of Emergency Care»
Moldova, Republic of

Head of the clinical department

1 T. Chorbe St., Chisinau, MD 421, Moldova



References

1. Kuroyedov A.V., Golubev S.Yu., Shafranov G.V. Investigation of morphometric criteria of the optic disc in the light of the possibilities of laser diagnostic equipment. Glaucoma. 2005; 2:7-19. (In Russ.).

2. Liebman E.S. Epidemiological characteristics of glaucoma. Glaucoma. 2009; 1:2-3. (In Russ.).

3. Kuroedov A.V. Pharmacoeconomic approaches to the treatment of patients with glaucoma. Oftalmologic vedomosti. 2010; 1:51-62. (In Russ.).

4. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Y.S., Erichev V.P. Nacional’noe rukovodstvo po glaukome dlja praktikujushhih vrachej. [National glaucoma guidelines for practicing doctors]. Moscow, GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2015; 452 p. (In Russ.).

5. Petrov S.Y., Makarova A.S., Volzhanin A.V. Efficacy and safety profile of generic IOP-lowering agents. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(2):27-36. (In Russ.).

6. Kwon Y.H., Fingert J.H., Kuehn M.H., Alward W.L. Primary openangle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(11):1113–1124.

7. Nesterov A.P. Glaukoma. [Glaucoma]. M.: Medical News Agency Publ., 2008. 360 p. (In Russ.).

8. Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu. The duration of the hypotensive action of anti-glaucoma medicines. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology. 2016; 4:214-219. (In Russ.).

9. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Prediction of the disease duration and the age of patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma changes. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2014; 2:60-69. (In Russ.).

10. Petrov S.Yu., Volzhanin A.V. A review of the clinical experience of the therapy of glaucoma and ophthalmic hypertension with a fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol. RMJ. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017; 17(2):100-106. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-2-100-106.

11. Petrov S.Y., Antonov A.A., Makarova A.S., Savel’eva T.A., Loshchenov V.B. The effect of conjunctival flap type in primary trabeculectomy on surgical site oxygen metabolism and the hypotensive effect of the operation. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(1):64-75. (In Russ.).

12. Erichev V.P., Petrov S.Y., Antonov A.A., Volzhanin A.V. International standards of clinical trials in glaucoma surgery. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2016; 15(2):102-112. (In Russ.).

13. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Basinskiy A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu. et al. Multicenter study of intraocular pressure level in patients with moderate and advanced primary openangle glaucoma on treatment. Oftalmologic vedomosti. 2015; 8(1): 43-60. doi: 10.17816/OV2015143-60.

14. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma (4rd edition). 2014; 195 p.

15. Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W., Lichter P.R. et al. Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. Ophthalmology. 2009; 116(2):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051.

16. Lichter P.R., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W. et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(11):1943-1953.

17. Bengtsson B., Leske M.C., Hyman L., Heijl A. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology. 2007; 114(2):205-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.07.060.

18. Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volkov E.N. et al. Risk factors, pathogenetic factors in progression of glaucoma by results of multicenter study of Russian glaucoma society. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2012; 2:57-69. (In Russ.).

19. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volkov E.N. et al. Clinical multicenter study of trabeculectomy efficacy. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2013; 2:53-60. (In Russ.).

20. Whitson J.T., Realini T., Nguyen Q.H., McMenemy M.G., Goode S.M. Six-month results from a Phase III randomized trial of fixed-combination brinzolamide 1% + brimonidine 0.2% versus brinzolamide or brimonidine monotherapy in glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Clinical Ophthalmology. (Auckland, NZ) 2013; 7:1053-1060. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S46881.

21. Harasymowycz P., Birt C., Gooi P. et al. Medical Management of Glaucoma in the 21st Century from a Canadian Perspective. J Ophthalmology. 2016; 2016:6509809. doi: 10.1155/2016/6509809.

22. Higginbotham E.J. Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications. Clin Ophthalmol (Auckland, NZ). 2010; 4:1-9.

23. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S., Brezhnev A.Yu., Gazizova I.R. et al. Structural and functional diagnostic criteria in assessing the probability of suspected glaucoma and the early-stage glaucoma. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2017; 1:103-117. (In Russ.).

24. Listopadova N.A., Tugushi O.A., Agalakova et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of long-term monotherapy with the beta-blockers and adjunctive therapy with prostaglandins in primary open-angle glaucoma. Glaukoma. 2008; 7(4):17-19. (In Russ.).

25. Rozhko Yu.I., Skavronska E.V., Logosh M.V., Karpovich N.V., Solodovnikova N.G. Efficacy and tolerability of the combined drug Duotrav in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Recipe. 2009; 2:104-107. (In Russ.).

26. Lovpache Dzh.N., Dorofeev D.A. Pharmacoeconomic expediency of the use of non-conservative therapy in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with the «dry eye» syndrome (intermediate results). RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology. 2017; 18(4):195-200. (In Russ.). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-4-195-200.

27. Rozhko Yu.I., Marchenko L.N. 2 year experience of usage of fixed combination of 1% brinzolamide and 0.5% timolol in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2011; 4:132-135. (In Russ.).

28. Inoue K., Okayama R., Higa R. Assessment of ocular hypotensive effect and safety 12 months after changing from an unfixed combination to a latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2012; 6:607-612. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S30611.

29. Alm A., Grunden J.W., Kwok K.K. Five-year, multicenter safety study of fixed-combination latanoprost/timolol (Xalacom) for open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. J Glaucoma. 2011; 20(4):215-222.

30. Kuroedov A.V., Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma: the age at which the patient and duration of disease which may occur blindness. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2014; 2:74-84. (In Russ.).

31. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Multicenter study of intraocular pressure level in patients with moderate and advanced primary open-angle glaucoma on treatment. Ophthalmologic vedomosti. 2015; 1:52-69. (In Russ.).

32. Abysheva L.D., Aleksandrov A.S., Arapiev M.U. Ardzheneshvily T.D., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S. et al. Optimization of diagnosis and treatment options in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2016; 15(2):19-35. (In Russ.).

33. Kuroyedov A., Avdeev R., Alexandrov A., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Projected age of patients and disease duration for intensive therapeutic and prophylactic actions in primary glaucoma. Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2014; 3:59-71. (In Russ.).

34. Kuroyedov A., Abysheva L., Avdeev R., Alexandrov A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Medico-economic multicenter study of local hypotensive therapy efficacy and cost for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in CIS. Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2015; 3:35-51. (In Russ.).

35. Kuroyedov A., Abysheva L., Avdeev R., Alexandrov A., Basinsky A., Blyum E. et al. Intraocular pressure level in various local hypotensive therapy in primary open-angle glaucoma (multicenter study). Ophthalmology Eastern Europe. 2016; 6(1):27-42. (In Russ.).

36. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Arapiev M.U., Bakunina N.A., Basinskiy A.S., Belaya D.A. et al. Suspected glaucoma and early stage glaucoma: differential diagnostic criteria. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2017; 10(4):5-15. doi: 10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-4-5-15. (In Russ.).

37. Kuroedov A.V., Abysheva L.D., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S. et al. Management of primary open-angle glaucoma in practice: variants of medical, laser and surgical treatment. Medical and Biological Problems of Life. 2016; 1:170-185. (In Russ.).

38. Kuroyedov A.V., Nagornova Z.M., Seleznev A.V., Zavadskiy P.Ch., Brezhnev A.Yu., Petrov S.Yu. Influence of different local hypotensive therapy regimens on the development and progression of the «dry eye» syndrome. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(3):71-80. (In Russ.).

39. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Belaya D.A., Brezhnev A.Yu. et al. Comparison of treatment regimens for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with signs of disease progression. Part 1. IOP levels. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2018; 17(1):14-28. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Belaya D.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volzhanin A.V., Volkova N.V., Gabdrakhmanov L.M., Gazizova I.R., Galimova A.B., Garkavenko V.V., Getmanova A.M., Gorodnichy V.V., Gusarevitch A.A., Dorofeev D.A., Dyukareva Y.F., Zavadsky P.Ch., Zakhidov A.B., Zvereva O.G., Karimov U.R., Kondrakova I.V., Kuroyedov A.V., Lanin S.N., Lovpache D.N., Molchanova E.V., Nagornova Z.M., Onufriychuk O.N., Petrov S.Yu., Rozhko Yu.I., Sangilbayeva Zh.O., Seleznev A.V., Tashtitova L.B., Usmanov S.V., Khohlova A.S., Shakhalova A.P., Sevciuc R.V. Comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma treatment regimens for patients with disease progression characteristics. Part 2. The efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment regimens. National Journal glaucoma. 2018;17(2):65-83. (In Russ.)

Views: 1049


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)