Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: modern approach to monitoring

https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.04.03

Abstract

 PURPOSE: To conduct a comparative analysis of clinical and functional parameters in patients with primary openangle glaucoma (POAG), pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PEG) and pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PES), to justify angio-OCT expedience in diagnostics and monitoring.

METHODS: The study included 121 patients (121 eyes). Group 1 consisted of 29 patients (29 eyes) diagnosed with stage I PEG. Group 2 included 32 patients (32 eyes) diagnosed with stage I POAG. Group 3 consisted of 31 patients (31 eyes) with pseudoexfoliative syndrome signs. Group 4 (control) consisted of 28 people (28 eyes) without significant ophthalmopathology. Patients underwent standard ophthalmologic examination, tonography, gonioscopy, pachymetry, tonometry, perimetry, optical coherent angiography of the optic disc. All patients underwent 3 examinations: at baseline, 6 and 12 months after.

RESULTS: Angio-OCT data comparison showed that morphometric parameters of the optic disc and microhemodynamics indices differed significantly between all the studied groups. Patients’ examination a year after revealed a negative dynamics of the optic disc parameters in some patients, with the most significant changes observed in PEG patients. To identify the diagnostic significance of the optic disc morphological parameters, the parameters of the peripapillary zone and the macular area, a comparative study of angioOCT data was conducted. Scatterplots with regression equations were also constructed based on data obtained during the second and the third follow-up examinations.

CONCLUSION: The study results showed that morphometric indices and optic disc perfusion indices differ significantly both in healthy patients as compared to POAG patients, and in patients with different types of glaucoma. The conducted correlation analysis showed that morphometric indices dynamics correlate with microcirculation indicators in glaucoma patients. Retinal ganglion cells apoptosis and optic nerve fiber degradation was most prominent in PEG patients. Correlation analysis showed that the optic disc microcirculation indicators, specifically the perfusion density and vascular density, were the most significant criteria indicating the pathological process progression. Therefore they may be used as reliable markers  of the pathological process.

About the Authors

M. Meskini
V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Eye Diseases Department
Russian Federation

Postgraduate

112 Bolshaya Kazachya str., Saratov, Russion Federaion, 410012;



T. G. Kamenskikh
V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Eye Diseases Department
Russian Federation

Med.Sc.D., Professor; Head of the Eye Diseases Department

112 Bolshaya Kazachya str., Saratov, Russion Federaion, 410012;



Е. V. Veselova
V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Eye Diseases Department
Russian Federation

Ph.D., Assistant professor

112 Bolshaya Kazachya str., Saratov, Russion Federaion, 410012;



I. О. Kolbenev
V.I. Razumovsky Saratov State Medical University, Eye Diseases Department
Russian Federation

Ph.D., Assistant professor

112 Bolshaya Kazachya str., Saratov, Russion Federaion, 410012



O. N. Dolinina
Yu.A. Gagarin Saratov State Technical University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

77 Polytechnic St., Saratov, Russion Federaion, 410054



V. V. Pechenkin
Yu.A. Gagarin Saratov State Technical University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Science, Ph.D. in Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor

77 Polytechnic St., Saratov, Russion Federaion, 410054



References

1. Brezhnev A.Yu.,Kurysheva N.I., Trubilin V.N., Baranov V.I. Problems of early clinical diagnosis of pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2012; 1:49-52. (In Russ.).

2. Brezhnev A.Yu., Ivanov V.P., Baranov V.I. The role of antioxidant defense genes in the development of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. National J Glaucoma. 2015; 14(2):38-44. (In Russ.).

3. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hyman L., Bengtsson B. et al. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology. 1999; 106(11):2144-2153.

4. Erichev V.P., Tumanov V.P., Panyushina L.A. Glaucoma and neurodegenerative diseases. National J Glaucoma. 2012; 1:62-68. (In Russ.).

5. Kurysheva N.I., Brezhnev A.Yu., Kapkova S.G. Prevalence of pseudoexfoliation glaucoma in the Central and Central Black Earth regions of Russia. Glaucoma. 2008; 3:11–15. (In Russ.).

6. Antosis G., Konstas A., Mantziris D., Stewart W. Diurnal intraocular pressure in untreated exfoliation and primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997; 115(2):182-185.

7. Kurysheva N.I. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Training manual. Moscow; 2008. 5 p.


Review

For citations:


Meskini M., Kamenskikh T.G., Veselova Е.V., Kolbenev I.О., Dolinina O.N., Pechenkin V.V. Pseudoexfoliation syndrome and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma: modern approach to monitoring. National Journal glaucoma. 2019;18(4):35-43. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.04.03

Views: 768


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)