Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Adherence to glaucoma hypotensive therapy: patients' opinions on key factors of low compliance. Analytical multi-central study results

https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.03.02

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the main risk factors of noncompliance in glaucoma patients with different disease duration according to patients’ opinion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analytical, multi-center study was conducted based on a survey of 616 patients with different glaucoma duration. The survey was carried out by 43 doctors from 7 countries. Questionnaires of patients included four main groups of risk factors for noncompliance. The rating of factors was evaluated by the average score, which patients assigned to this factor. The significance of 32 selected factors for non-compliance was evaluated using a point system from 10 (maximum significant factor) to 1 (minimum significant factor).

Analysis program: Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft Inc.,USA).

RESULTS: Data analysis revealed the leading factors for non-compliance according to patients’ opinion. They were factors of behavioral compliance (75%): lack of motivation; a complex instillation regime, changing the common way of life; lack of contact with the doctor; low degree of disease awareness; old and senile age. According to the patients themselves, the first place was occupied by factors related directly to treatment (40%), namely: current employment and employment at work; the number of bottles and the complicated mode of instillations, changing the common way of life; cost of drugs; the presence of side effects.

CONCLUSION: The proportion of low-grade patients, according to the answers of the patients themselves, is 24.4%, medium-sized — 74.4% and high-grade — 1.2%. The average treatment adherence in glaucoma patients was lower than expected. Understanding the main factors for non-compliance helps developing measures to increase it. The role of the joint work of the doctor and patient, aimed at achieving a common goal — improving the quality of treatment, is very important.

About the Authors

A. V. Korneeva
LLC 3Z
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. V. Kuroyedov
Mandryka Central Military Clinical Hospital; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Moscow


P. Ch. Zavadski
Ophthalmological Center of Karelia
Russian Federation
Petrozavodsk


I. R. Gazizova
Federal State Scientific Institute of Experimental Medicine
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg


Dzh. N. Lovpache
LLC 3Z
Russian Federation
Moscow


O. N. Onufriychuk
6Federal State Budgetary Institution the Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children’s Orthopedics
Russian Federation
Saint-Petersburg


R. V. Avdeev
Burdenko State Medical University
Russian Federation
Voronezh


N. A. Bakunina
Pirogov City Clinic N 1
Russian Federation
Moscow


D. A. Baryshnikova
City Institution of Public Health, Polyclinic 13
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. S. Basinskiy
Basinsky Оphthalmology Center
Russian Federation
Orel


E. A. Blyum
MEDIKER 4K
Kazakhstan
Shymkent


I. A. Bulakh
LLC Medical Center “Ivastramed”
Russian Federation
Ivanovo


N. N. Voronova
Georgievsky Medical Academy of Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation
Simferopol


L. M. Gabdrahmanov
Eroshevskiy Regional Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital
Russian Federation
Samara


A. M. Gadzhiev
State Budgetary Institution of Health Care of Leningrad region “Vsevolzhskaya Clinical Inter-District Hospital”
Russian Federation
Vsevolzhsk


A. B. Galimova
Russian Center of Eye and Plastic Surgery
Russian Federation
Ufa


O. V. Gaponko
Mandryka Central Military Clinical Hospital; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Moscow


V. V. Gar’kavenko
17Voyno-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk


A. M. Getmanova
Regional Eye Hospital
Russian Federation
Bryansk


I. A. Glushnev
State Institution “Republican Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology”
Belarus
Gomel


V. V. Gorodnichiy
Mandryka Central Military Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. A. Gusarevich
Health Care Institution “Clinical Hospital RZD-Medicine”
Russian Federation
Novosibirsk


D. A. Dorofeev
Public Clinical Hospital N 3
Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk


A. B. Zakhidov
“SAIF-OPTIMA” Eye Microsurgery Clinic
Uzbekistan
Tashkent


O. G. Zvereva
Kazan State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Kazan


S. A. Zubasheva
N 9 Treatment and Diagnostic Medical Center
Russian Federation
Moscow


I. N. Isakov
State Autonomous Health Institution “Novokuznetsk City Clinical Hospital N 1”
Russian Federation
Novokuznets


U. R. Karimov
Sirdarya Regional Ophthalmological Hospital
Uzbekistan
Gulistan


I. V. Kondrakova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Moscow


S. V. Kosmynina
LLC “Pavlov-Med”
Russian Federation
Murmansk


S. N. Lanin
Makarov Regional State Budgetary Health Care Institution
Russian Federation
Krasnoyarsk


E. V. Molchanova
Omsk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Omsk


Z. M. Nagornova
Ivanovo State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Ivanovo


E. A. Nikiforova
State Autonomous Institution of the Republic of Sakha “Yakut Republican Ophthalmological Clinical Hospital”
Russian Federation
Yakutsk


E. Yu. Openkova
City Clinical Hospital N 8
Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk


N. A. Rabianok
State Institution “Republican Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology”
Belarus
Gomel


Yu. I. Rozhko
State Institution “Republican Scientific Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology”
Belarus
Gomel


A. V. Seleznev
Ivanovo State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Ivanovo


I. I. Semenova
Mogilev State Hospital of Ambulance
Belarus
Mogilev


Yu. P. Sotnikova
Hadassa Medical Ltd.
Russian Federation
Moscow


N. E. Fomin
Mandryka Central Military Clinical Hospital; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Russian Federation
Moscow


S. V. Chistyakova
Georgievsky Medical Academy of Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
Russian Federation
Simferopol


T. V. Chernyakova
Multi-Field Medical Center of Bank of Russia
Russian Federation
Moscow


A. P. Shahalova
Medical Clinical Center “Tonus Amaris”
Russian Federation
N.-Novgorod


I. V. Shaposhnikova
Ophthalmic Center “Good Vision”
Russian Federation
Kemerovo


R. V. Shevchuyk
Emergency Medicine Institute
Moldova, Republic of
Chisinau


L. B. Тashtitova
Kazakh Eye State Institute
Kazakhstan
Almaty


A. M. Yuldashev
Daniyarov Kyrgyz State Medical Institution of Retraining and Advanced Training
Kyrgyzstan
Bishkek


References

1. Quigley H.A., Broman A.T. The number of people with glaucoma worldwi de in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90: 262–267. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.081224

2. Resnikoff S., Pascolini D., Etya’Ale D., et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull. World Health Org. 2004; 82:844–851. doi:/S0042-96862004001100009

3. Meier-Gibbons F. Current strategies for improving treatment adherence and persistence in glaucoma management. View on Glaucoma. 2019; 13(1):4–7.

4. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome: dlja praktikujushhih vrachej [National glaucoma guidelines: for medical practitioners]. Ed. by E.A. Egorov, V.P. Erichev. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 384 p. (In Russ.). doi:10.33029/9704-5442-8-GLA-2020-1-384

5. World Health Organization. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. World Health Organization. Geneva; 2003.

6. Olthoff C., Schouten J., van de Borne B., Webers C. Noncompliance with ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma or ocular

7. hypertension an evidence-based review. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112(6):953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.035

8. Quigley H.A., Friedman D.S., Hahn S.R. Evaluation of practice patterns for the care of open-angle glaucoma compared with claims data; the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study. Ophthalmol. 2007; 114(9):1599-1606.

9. Konstas A.G., Maskaleris G., Gratsonidis S., Sardelli C. Compliance and viewpoint of glaucoma patients in Greece. Eye. 2000; 14(5):752– 756. doi:10.1038/eye.2000.197

10. Sleath B., Robin A.L., Covert D., Byrd J.E. et al. Patient-reported behavior and problems in using glaucoma medications. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113(3):431–436. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.10.034

11. Dreer L.E., Girkin C., Mansberger S.L. Determinants of medication adherence to topical glaucoma therapy. J Glaucoma. 2012; 21(4):234–240. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31821dac86.

12. Patel S.C., Spaeth G.L. Compliance in patients prescribed eyedrops for glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg. 1995; 26(3):233–236.

13. Kosoko O., Quigley H.A., Vitale S., Enger C. et al. Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents' eye clinic. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105(11):2105–2111. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91134-4

14. Gurwitz J.H., Yeomans S.M., Glynn R.J., Lewis B.E. et al. Patient noncompliance in the managed care setting. The case of medical therapy for glaucoma. Medical care. 1998; 36(3):357–369. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199803000-00012

15. Friedman D.S., Quigley H.A., Gelb L. et al. Using pharmacy claims data to study adherence to glaucoma medications: methodology and findings of the Glaucoma Adherence and Persistency Study (GAPS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48(11):5052–5057. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0290

16. Kazanova S.Y. Analysis of treatment adherence in chronic disease patients. National journal glaucoma. 2018; 17(3):97-110. (In Russ.). doi:10.25700/NJG.2018.03.11

17. Kharkovskii A.O. Kak zastavit' patsienta lechit'sya? [How to get a patient to be treated?] Prague: Linksolutions; 2012. 76 p. (In Russ.).

18. Robin A., Grover D.S. Compliance and adherence in glaucoma management. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011; 59(1):93–96. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.73693

19. Rees G., Chong X., Cheung C.Y., Aung T., Friedman D.S., Crowston J.G. et al. Beliefs and adherence to glaucoma treatment: a comparison of patients from diverse cultures. J Glaucoma. 2014; 23(5):293–298. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741f1c

20. Boland M.V., Chang D.S., Frazier T., Plyler R., Friedman D.S. Electronic monitoring to assess adherence with once-daily glaucoma medications and risk factors for nonadherence: the automated dosing reminder study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014; 132(7):838–844. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.856

21. Dietlein T.S., Rosentreter A., Lappas A. Complexities of medical glaucoma therapy — the elderly patient in focus. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2016; 233(2):138–142. doi:10.1055/s-0041-110447

22. Alexeyev V.N., Malevannaya O.A., Samih El Hazh N. Reasons for low commitment to the treatment of patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Oftalmologičeskie vedomosti. 2010; 4:37-39. (In Russ.).

23. Nagornova Z.M., Seleznev A.V., Kuroyedov A.V., Zavadsky P.C. et al. Classification of approaches to primary open-angle glaucoma treatment considering real clinical practice. National journal glaucoma. 2019; 18(3):3-19. (In Russ.). doi:10.25700/NJG.2019.03.01

24. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S. et al. Prediction of disease duration and age of patients with different primary open-angle glaucoma changes. National journal glaucoma. 2014; 13(2):60-69. (In Russ.).

25. Kuroyedov A.V., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A., Basinsky A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu. et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma: at what age and at what disease duration blindness can occur. Medical and biological problems of life activity. 2014; 2(12): 74-84. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Korneeva A.V., Kuroyedov A.V., Zavadski P.Ch., Gazizova I.R., Lovpache D.N., Onufriychuk O.N., Avdeev R.V., Bakunina N.A., Baryshnikova D.A., Basinskiy A.S., Blyum E.A., Bulakh I.A., Voronova N.N., Gabdrahmanov L.M., Gadzhiev A.M., Galimova A.B., Gaponko O.V., Gar’kavenko V.V., Getmanova A.M., Glushnev I.A., Gorodnichiy V.V., Gusarevich A.A., Dorofeev D.A., Zakhidov A.B., Zvereva O.G., Zubasheva S.A., Isakov I.N., Karimov U.R., Kondrakova I.V., Kosmynina S.V., Lanin S.N., Molchanova E.V., Nagornova Z.M., Nikiforova E.A., Openkova E.Yu., Rabianok N.A., Rozhko Yu.I., Seleznev A.V., Semenova I.I., Sotnikova Yu.P., Fomin N.E., Chistyakova S.V., Chernyakova T.V., Shahalova A.P., Shaposhnikova I.V., Shevchuyk R.V., Тashtitova L.B., Yuldashev A.M. Adherence to glaucoma hypotensive therapy: patients' opinions on key factors of low compliance. Analytical multi-central study results. National Journal glaucoma. 2020;19(3):12-21. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.03.02

Views: 838


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)