The correct choice of monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues/ prostamides at the start of treatment for newly diagnosed glaucoma (results of a multicenter study)
https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.03.05
Abstract
PURPOSE: To establish the hypotensive effectiveness of the appointment of monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues/prostamide as the «starting» therapy for clinic stages of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and the feasibility of combining them with local carbonic anhydrase inhibitors to correct the treatment regimen if necessary.
METHODS: A multicenter analytical cohort sample scientific prospective dynamic study was conducted on 30 scientific and clinical bases in 4 countries from December
2019 to February 2020. The study included patients with primarily diagnosed glaucoma (different stages, except terminal stage) — 60 patients (60 eyes). The eyes with the most pronounced glaucoma changes were the main focus of the study. Gender distribution: male — 31 (51.7%), female — 29 (48.3%), average age — 64 years. POAG diagnosis was verified by static computer perimetry, intraocular pressure (IOP) values and morphometric data of the optic disc. Measurement of the central thickness of the cornea in the optical zone and the thickness of the retinal nerve fibre layer via оptical coherence tomography was additional. We studied the tonometric and pneumotonometric IOP at the day of glaucoma diagnosis verification, one day after, 14 and 30 days after the therapy start. Monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues was offered to all patients as starting therapy. Local carbonic anhydrase inhibitors were used as additive therapy if necessary. Treatment correction was carried out 14 days after the therapy start.
RESULTS: The average IOP in all stages was 27.5 [24; 31] mm Hg, and 2 weeks after the appointment of prostaglandin analogues, it decreased to 20 [19; 21] mm Hg. IOP decrease percentage amounted to 26.9% [33.3; 19.1] of the initial values. Optimal IOP has achieved in 46 of 60 patients (76.7%). These were mainly patients with an early stage of POAG. By the end of the second week of treatment, 14 patients (25%) needed additional hypotensive therapy using local carbonic anhydrase inhibitors. On day 30 without the use of additional therapy, IOP level reduced by 28.8% [33.3; 19.2], and in patients with combination therapy by 32.75% [41.9; 23.7].
CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the feasibility of using a differentiated («stepwise») approach to the treatment of patients with different clinical stages of first-time diagnosed POAG.
About the Authors
A. A. GusarevichRussian Federation
Ph.D., Head of Department
2a Vladimirovskiy spusk st., Novosibirsk, 630003
P. C. Zavadski
Russian Federation
Ph.D., MD
1B Naberezhnaya Varkausa st., Petrozavodsk, 185031
A. V. Kuroyedov
Russian Federation
Med.Sc.D., Professor, Head of Department
8а Bol’shaya Olen’ya st., Moscow, 107014;
1 Ostrovitianov st., Moscow, 117997
I. R. Gazizova
Russian Federation
Med.Sc.D., Head of Department
12 Akademika Pavlova st., Saint-Petersburg, 197376
O. G. Zvereva
Russian Federation
Head of Glaucoma Cabinet pan>
36 Butlerova st., Kazan, 420012
U. R. Karimov
Uzbekistan
Ph.D., MD
62 Navoi st., Gulistan, Uzbekistan, 120100
P. G. Filippov
Russian Federation
Head of Clinic
1A Grazhdanskaya st., Vladimir, 600021
S. V. Diordiichuk
Russian Federation
MD
8а Bol’shaya Olen’ya st., Moscow, 107014
D. A. Dorofeev
Russian Federation
MD
200 Rossiiskaya st., Chelyabinsk, 454090
S. V. Kosmynina
Russian Federation
MD
6/3 Pavlova st., Murmansk, 183000
R. V. Avdeev
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Head of Department
10 Students st., Voronezh, 394036
V. V. Gorodnichii
Russian Federation
MD
8а Bol’shaya Olen’ya st., Moscow, 107014
A. B. Zakhidov
Uzbekistan
Ph.D., MD
32 Alimkent 1-tor st., Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 100016
S. A. Zubasheva
Russian Federation
MD
15/18/1 B. Pirogovskaya st., Moscow, 119021
N. A. Bakunina
Russian Federation
Ph.D., MD
8 Leninskiy prospeсt st., Moscow, 119049
D. A. Baryshnikova
Russian Federation
MD
30/2 Novoyasenevsiy prospect st., Moscow, 117463
A. S. Basinskiy
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Head of Clinic
1 Krasnoarmeyskaya st., Orel, 302040
L. M. Gabdrakhmanov
Russian Federation
Ph.D., MD
158 Novo-Sadovaya st., Samara, 443068 letter-spacing:.1pt;mso-font-width:105%'>2
O. V. Gaponko
Russian Federation
Ph.D., MD
8а Bol’shaya Olen’ya st., Moscow, 107014;
1 Ostrovitianov st., Moscow, 117997 /span>
V. V. Gar’kavenko
Russian Federation
Ph.D., MD
1 Partizana Zheleznjaka st., Krasnoyarsk, 660022 i>
A. M. Getmanova
Russian Federation
MD
86 Stanke Dimitrova st., Bryansk, 241028
S. A. Zhavoronkov
Russian Federation
MD
11 Yauzskaya st., Moscow, 109240
I. V. Kondrakova
Russian Federation
MD
8а Bol’shaya Olen’ya st., Moscow, 107014
S. N. Lanin
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Head of Department
1v Nikitina st., Krasnoyarsk, 660022
E. V. Molchanova
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Associate Professor
12 Lenina st., Omsk, 644099 ng:.25pt'> 660022
O. S. Myakonkaya
Russian Federation
MD, Head of Department
80 Zemlyatchki st., Volgograd, 400138
N. A. Rabianok
Belarus
MD
290 Ilyicha st., Gomel, Republic of Belarus, 246940
Yu. I. Razhko
Belarus
Ph.D., Associate Professor
290 Ilyicha st., Gomel, Republic of Belarus, 246940
T. V. Chernyakova
Russian Federation
Ph.D., MD
66 Sevastopol prospect Ave., Moscow, 117593
A. P. Shakhalova
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Head of Department
38 Belinskogo st., Nizhny Novgorod, 603000 > ng:.25pt'> 660022
A. M. Iuldashev
Kyrgyzstan
Assistant Professor
144A B. Bokonbaev st., Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic, 720040.
References
1. Kass M.A., Heuer D.K., Higginbotham E.J. et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120(6):701-713. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.701
2. Heijl A., Leske M.C., Bengtsson B. et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Mild Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 120(10):1268-1279. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268
3. Leske M.C., Heijl A., Hyman L., Bengtsson B. Mild manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmol. 1999; 106(11):2144-2153. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90497-9
4. Agarwal R., Gupta S.K., Agarwal P. et al. Current concepts in the pathophysiology of glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009; 57(4):257-266. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.53049
5. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome dlya praktikuyushchih vrachej [National glaucoma guideline for practitioners]. Moscow: GEOTARMedia; 2019. 384 р.
6. European Glaucoma Society. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma (4rd edition). 2014. 192 p.
7. Racional'naya farmakoterapiya v oftal'mologii: Rukovodstvo dlya praktikuyushchih vrachej.[Rational Pharmacotherapy in Ophthalmology: A Guide for physician]. Ed. by Egorov E.A. Moscow: Literra; 2004. 954 p.
8. van der Valk R., Webers C.A., Lumley T. et al. A network meta-analysis combined direct and indirect comparisons between glaucoma drugs to rank effectiveness in lowering intraocular pressure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009; 62(12):1279-1283. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.012
9. Camras B., Alm A., Watson P., Stjernschantz J. Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, for glaucoma therapy. Efficacy and safety after 1 year of treatment in 198 patients. Latanoprost study groups. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(11):1916-1924. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(96)30749-5
10. Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Y., Lovpache J.N. et al. The feasibility of adopting «stepwise» initial approaches in treatment of patients with different stages of glaucoma. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2018; 17(4):27-54. doi: 10.25700/NJG.2018.04.03
11. Kuroyedov A.V., Krinitsyna E.A., Sergeeva V.M., Gorodnichiy V.V. Changes in the structure of clinical and epidemiological characteristics of primary open-angle glaucoma over 10 years in patients coming to surgical treatment. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2017; 4:205-212. doi:10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-4-205-212
12. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A. et al. Comparison of treatment regimens for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with signs of disease progression. Part 1. IOP levels. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2018;17(1):14-28. doi:10.25700/NJG.2018.01.02
13. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A. et al. Comparison of primary open-angle glaucoma treatment regimens for patients with disease progression characteristics. Part 2. The efficacy of initial hypotensive treatment regimens. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2018; 17(2):65-83. doi:10.25700/NJG.2018.02.07
14. Volkova N.V., Zavadsky P.Ch., Kuroyedov A.V. et al. Hypotensive regimens providing target intraocular pressure in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (results of a multicenter analytical study). Natsional'nyi zhur nal glaukoma. 2019; 18(4):44-59. doi:10.25700/NJG.2019.04.04
15. Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu. The duration of the hypotensive action of anti-glaucoma medicines. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2016; 4:214-219. doi:10.21689/2311-7729-2016-16-4-214-219
16. Makogon S.I., Onishchenko A.L., Yatsenko L.L., Karmanova O.A. Efficacy of first-choice therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed primary glaucoma. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2018; 17(2):28-37. doi:10.25700/NJG.2018.02.04
17. Blica S., Saunte E. Timolol maleate in the treatment of glaucoma simplex and glaucoma capsulare. A three-year follow up study. Acta Ophthalmol. (Copenh). 1982; 60(6):967-976. doi:10.1111/j.1755-3768.1982.tb00629.x
18. Kobelt G. Comparative data for all countries. In: Primary open-angle glaucoma. Differences in international treatment patterns and costs. Eds. Jönsson B., Krieglstein G. Oxford, England: ISIS Medical Media; 1998: 116-126.
19. Lichter P.R., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W. et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment randomized to medication or surgery. Ophthalmology. 2001; 108(11):1943-1953. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00873-9
20. Garway-Heath D.F., Crabb D.P., Bunce C. et al. Latanoprost for openangle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 385(9975):1295-1304. doi:10.1016/ S0140-6736(14)62111-5
21. Li N., Chen X.M., Zhou Y. et al. Travoprost compared with other prostaglandin analogues or timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Exper Ophthalmol. 2006; 34(8):755-764. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01237.x
22. Sambhara D., Aref A.A. Glaucoma management: relative value and place in therapy of available drug treatments. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2014; 5(1):30-43. doi:10.1177/2040622313511286
23. Noecker R.J., Dirks M.S., Choplin N.T. et al. Comparison of latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 12-week, randomized, masked-evaluator multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004; 137(1):210-211. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.030
24. Ernest P.J., Schouten J.S., Beckers H.J. et al. An evidence-based review of prognostic factors for glaucomatous visual field progression. Ophthalmology. 2013; 120(3):512-519. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.005
25. Covert D., Robin A.L. Adjunctive glaucoma therapy use associated with travoprost, bimatoprost, and latanoprost. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006; 22(5):971-976. doi:10.1185/030079906x104777
26. Whitson J.T. Glaucoma: a review of adjunctive therapy and new management strategies. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007; 8(18): 3237-3249. doi:10.1517/1465666.8.18.3237
27. Nesterov A.P., Bunin Y.A. About the new classification of primary glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 1977; 5:38-42.
28. Mills R.P., Budenz D.L., Lee P.P. et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141(1): 24-30. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.044
29. Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S. et al. Risk factors, pathogens development and progression of the results of a multicenter study of Russian glaucoma society. Medical and biological problems of life. 2012; 2(8):57-69.
30. Kuroedov A.V., Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S. et al. Primary openangle glaucoma: patient’s age and disease duration at which blindness may occur. Medical and biological problems of life. 2014; 2(12):74-84.
31. Abysheva L.D., Aleksandrov A.S., Arapiev M.U. Optimization of diagnosis and treatment options in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2016; 15(2):19-35.
32. Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S. et al. Multicenter study of intraocular pressure level in patients with moderate and advanced primar y open-angle glaucoma on treatment. Of talmologičeskie vedomosti. 2015; 8(1):43-60. doi:10.17816/OV2015143-60
33. Astakhov Yu.S., Vasilyev V.B., Rakhmanov V.V. Mutations and polymorphisms inof myocilin and optineurin genes: importance for early diagnosismyocilin and optineurin as risk factors of primary open-angle glaucoma. RMJ. Clinical ophthalmology. 2005; 2:48-51.
34. Green C.M., Kearns L.S., Wu J. et al. How significant is a family history of glaucoma? Experience from the glaucoma inheritance study in Tasmania. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 35(9):793-799. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01612.x
35. Wolfs R.C., Klaver C.C., Ramratan R.S. et al. Genetic risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Population-based familial aggregation study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116(12):1640-1645. doi:10.1001/archopht.116.12.1640
36. Kwon Y.H., Fingert J.H., Kuehn M.H., Alward W.L. Primary open-angle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(11):1113-1124. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0804630
37. Leske M.C. Incidence of Open-Angle Glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119(1):89-95.
38. Klein B.E., Klein R., Lee K.E. Heritability of Risk Factors for Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45(1): 59-62. doi:10.1167/iovs.03-0516
39. Anderson D.R. Collaborative Normal Tension Glaucoma Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003; 14(2):86-90. doi:10.1097/00055735-200304000-00006
Review
For citations:
Gusarevich A.A., Zavadski P.C., Kuroyedov A.V., Gazizova I.R., Zvereva O.G., Karimov U.R., Filippov P.G., Diordiichuk S.V., Dorofeev D.A., Kosmynina S.V., Avdeev R.V., Gorodnichii V.V., Zakhidov A.B., Zubasheva S.A., Bakunina N.A., Baryshnikova D.A., Basinskiy A.S., Gabdrakhmanov L.M., Gaponko O.V., Gar’kavenko V.V., Getmanova A.M., Zhavoronkov S.A., Kondrakova I.V., Lanin S.N., Molchanova E.V., Myakonkaya O.S., Rabianok N.A., Razhko Yu.I., Chernyakova T.V., Shakhalova A.P., Iuldashev A.M. The correct choice of monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues/ prostamides at the start of treatment for newly diagnosed glaucoma (results of a multicenter study). National Journal glaucoma. 2020;19(3):43-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.03.05