Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Comparison of the anatomical, topographic and refractive shift in the eyes after the penetrating and non-penetrating glaucoma surgery

https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.02.03

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the biometric, biomechanic and keratorefractive shift after trabeculectomy and non-penetrative deep sclerectomy (NPDS).

METHODS: 45 patients after trabeculectomy and 45 patients after NPDS were included into the study. The patients were examined prior to surgery, one week, one month and three months after the surgery. Patients underwent tonometry and measurements of corneal biomehanic properties, axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness and pupil width. Keratorefractometry was performed to define refractive data and corneal curvature in the steep meridian (R1), flat meridian (R2), the average curvature (Ave), and the corneal cylinder.

RESULTS: The changes of intraocular pressure, biomechanical and refractive properties after trabeculectomy and NPDE were comparable. The following parameters were statistically different between two groups: during the first week — ACD (2.39 [1.95; 2.65] mm after trabeculectomy, 2.62 [2.33; 2.89] mm after NPDE); by the end of the first month — ACD (2.42 [2.24; 2.70] mm after trabeculectomy, 3.11 [2.68; 3.17] mm after NPDE), AL (23.70 [22.70; 24.11] mm after trabeculectomy, 25.11 [23.95; 26.25] mm after NPDE), R1 (7.53 [7.36; 7.70] mm after trabeculectomy, 7.93 [7.89; 8.05] mm after NPDE), and average curvity (7.47 [7.27; 7.65] mm after trabeculectomy, 7.88 [7.60; 7.92] mm after NPDE). No significant intergroup differences were noted by the end of the third month of follow-up. It is also worth noting, that a correlation between refraction shift with astigmatism development and corneal resistance change was observed in the NPDE group.

CONCLUSION: Significant differences between eyes after trabeculectomy and NPDE can be found in ACD values one week post-surgery and in ACD, AL and cornea curvature by the end of the first month. Refraction shift and astigmatism development after NPDE depends on the initial biomechanical properties of the cornea.

About the Authors

S. Yu. Petrov
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Med.Sc.D., senior research associate of Glaucoma Department

11A Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



A. V. Volzhanin
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Postgraduate student of Glaucoma Department

11A Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



E. G. Ryzhkova
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Junior research associate of Modern Treatment in Ophthalmology Department

11A Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



D. M. Safonova
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Ph.D., junior research associate Modern Treatment in Ophthalmology Department

11A Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



V. V. Averich
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

Ph.D., junior research associate of Refraction Department

11A Rossolimo st., Moscow, 119021



References

1. Tham Y.C., Li X., Wong T.Y., Quigley H.A., Aung T., Cheng C.Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(11):2081-2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

2. Wang W., He M., Li Z., Huang W. Epidemiological variations and trends in health burden of glaucoma worldwide. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97(3):e349-e355. doi:10.1111/aos.14044

3. Terminology and guidelines for glaucoma: European glaucoma soci- ety. 4th edition. Savona, Italy. 2014.

4. National guidelines of glaucoma for practicing doctors: 3rd edition, revised and updated. Ed. by Egorov E.A., Astakhov Yu.S., Erichev V.P. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ.; 2015. 456 p. (In Russ.).

5. Cairns J.E. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968; 66(4):673-679.

6. Petrov S.Yu., Volzhanin A.V. Trabeculectomy: history, terminology, tec- nique. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma. 2017; 16(2):82-91. (In Russ.).

7. Walker W.M., Kanagasundaram C.R. Surgery of the canal of Schlemm. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1964; 84:427-442.

8. Krasnov M.M. Sinusotomy in glaucoma. Vestn oftalmol. 1964; 80(2): 37-41. (In Russ.).

9. Fedorov S.N., Kozlov V.I., Timoshkina N.T., Sharova A.B., Ereskin N.N., Kozlova E.E. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery (Russ.). 1989(3-4):52-55. (In Russ.).

10. Rulli E., Biagioli E., Riva I., Gambirasio G., De Simone I., Floriani I., Qua- ranta L. Efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy vs nonpenetrating surgical procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131(12):1573-1582. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5059

11. Egorov E.A., Kuroyedov A.V., Gorodnichiy V.V., Petrov S.Yu., Kamen- skikh T.G. et al. Early and long-term outcomes of glaucoma surgery: the results of multicenter study of CIS countries. RMJ Clinical Oph- thalmology. 2017; 17(1):25-34 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21689/2311-7729-2017-17-1-25-34

12. Kandel H., Khadka J., Goggin M., Pesudovs K. Patient-reported outcomes for assessment of quality of life in refractive error: a systematic review. Optom Vis Sci. 2017; 94(12):1102-1119. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001143

13. Lou L., Yao C., Jin Y., Perez V., Ye J. Global patterns in health bur- den of uncorrected refractive error. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57(14):6271-6277. doi:10.1167/iovs.16-20242

14. Hirooka K., Nitta E., Ukegawa K., Tsujikawa A. Vision-related quality of life following glaucoma filtration surgery. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017; 17(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0466-7

15. Alvani A., Pakravan M., Esfandiari H., Safi S., Yaseri M., Pakravan P. Ocular biometric changes after trabeculectomy. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2016; 11(3):296-303. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.188399

16. Chan H.H.L., Kong Y.X.G. Glaucoma surgery and induced astigmatism: a sys- tematic review. Eye Vis (Lond). 2017; 4:27. doi:10.1186/s40662-017-0090-x

17. Pakravan M., Alvani A., Esfandiari H., Ghahari E., Yaseri M. Posttrabeculectomy ocular biometric changes. Clin Exp Optom. 2017; 100(2):128-132. doi:10.1111/cxo.12477

18. Casado A., Cabarga C., Perez-Sarriegui A., Fuentemilla E. Differenc- es in corneal biomechanics in nonpenetrating deep sclerectomy and deep sclerectomy reconverted into trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma. 2017; 26(1):15-19. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000538

19. Egrilmez S., Ates H., Nalcaci S., Andac K., Yagci A. Surgically induced corneal refractive change following glaucoma surgery: nonpenetrat- ing trabecular surgeries versus trabeculectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(6):1232-1239. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.055

20. Corcostegui J., Rebolleda G., Munoz-Negrete F.J. Refractive changes after phacoemulsification combined with deep sclerectomy assisted by corneal topography. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(11):2391-2396. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.05.012

21. El-Saied H.M., Foad P.H., Eldaly M.A., Abdelhakim M.A. Surgically induced astigmatism following glaucoma surgery in Egyptian patients. J Glaucoma. 2014; 23(3):190-193. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000035

22. Neroev V.V., Aliev A.A., Nurudinov M.M. Comparative analysis of opti- cal aberrations, anatomical and optical parameters of the cornea in glaucoma surgery. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2017; 11(4): 24-28. (In Russ.). doi:10.21516/2072-0076-2018-11-4-24-28


Review

For citations:


Petrov S.Yu., Volzhanin A.V., Ryzhkova E.G., Safonova D.M., Averich V.V. Comparison of the anatomical, topographic and refractive shift in the eyes after the penetrating and non-penetrating glaucoma surgery. National Journal glaucoma. 2020;19(2):23-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.02.03

Views: 510


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)