The influence of new ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on the level of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification
https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.02.04
Abstract
PURPOSE: The analysis of new cohesive and adhesive OVDs (Kogevisk and Adgevisk, "Solopharm") influence on the intraocular pressure (IOP) level in early postoperative period after phacoemulsification.
METHODS: The clinical study was based on an assessment of the clinical and functional state of 60 patients (60 eyes), which were divided into 2 groups depending on ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) used during the operation of phacoemulsification (Softshell technology): in Group I (30 patients, 30 eyes) Adgevisk was introduced for tissue protection, and Kogevisk — to create volume; in Group II (30 patients, 30 eyes), Viscoat was used to protect tissues and Amvisk Plus was used to create volume. During the postoperative period, all patients received standard anti-inflammatory therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in average patient age, operation field, preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), and preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) between the two groups. Prior to the surgery and in the postoperative period (after 30 minutes, 2 hours, 1 day, 7 days) the level of IOP was measured, and one day and one week after the surgery we measured CCT values and endothelial cells density (ECD). The duration of the operation and the amount of fluid required during each operation were also assessed.
RESULTS: Each patient showed a transient increase in IOP level, reaching its maximum 2 hours after the operation. There was no statistically significant difference in the severity of transient ophthalmic hypertension between the two groups, as well as between CCT and ECD values. There was no significant difference in the time of surgery between the groups. No complications were observed during the intraocular lens implantation in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The investigated OVDs Adgevisk and Kogevisk showed ease of use, safety, and the absence of adverse effects. Post-surgical changes in the IOP level after the use of Adgevisk and Kogevisk were comparable with those after other OVDs use. The reduced cost of the new OVDs presents an additional advantage.
About the Authors
I. A. LoskoutovRussian Federation
Med.Sc.D., Professor, Head of Ophthalmology Department
84 Volokolamsk highway, Moscow, 123567
A. V. Korneeva
Russian Federation
Ph.D., Ophthalmologist
3 Borisa Galushkina st., Moscow, 129301
References
1. Gross J.G., Meyer D.R., Robin A.L. et al. Increased intraocular pressure in the immediate postoperative period after extracapsular cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988; 105:466-469. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(88)90236-x
2. Fry L.L. Postoperative intraocular pressure rises: a comparison of Healon, Amvisc, and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989; 15: 415-420. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(89)80060-4
3. Rainer G., Menapace R., Schmid K.E. et al. Natural course of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with sodium chondroitin sulfate 4%–sodium hyaluronate 3% (Viscoat). Ophthalmol. 2005; 112:1714- 1718. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.05.011
4. Hayreh S.S. Anterior ischemic neuropathy. IV. Occurrence after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980; 98:1410-1416. doi:10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040262010
5. Byrd S., Singh K. Medical control of intraocular pressure after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:1493-1497. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80172-7
6. Rainer G., Menapace R., Findl O. et al. Intraocular pressure rise after small incision cataract surgery: a randomised intraindividual comparison of two dispersive viscoelastic agents. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85:139-142. doi:10.1136/bjo.85.2.139
7. Probst L.E., Nichols B.D. Corneal endothelial and intraocular pressure changes after phacoemulsification with Amvisc Plus and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993; 19:725-730. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80341-0
8. Rainer G., Menapace R., Findl O. et al. Intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery with Healon5 and Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000; 26:271-276. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00367-3
9. Hütz W.W., Eckhardt H.B., Kohnen T. Comparison of viscoelastic substances used in phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996; 22:955-959. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80198-2
10. Fry L.L. Comparison of the postoperative intraocular pressure with Betagan, Betoptic, Timoptic, Iopidine, Diamox, Pilopine Gel, and Miostat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992; 18:14-19. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80378-1
11. Çetinkaya A., Akman A., Akova Y.A. Effect of topical 1% and brimonidine 0.2% on intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30:1736-1741. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.050
12. Dayanir V., Özcura F., Kir E. et al. Medical control of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 31:484- 488. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.07.024
13. Rainer G., Menapace R., Findl O. et al. Effect of topical brimonidine on intraocular pressure after small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:1227-1231. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00790-8
14. Rainer G., Menapace R., Findl O. et al. Effect of fixed dorzolamide– timolol combination on intraocular pressure rise after small incision cataract surgery with Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1748- 1752. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(02)01981-8
15. Ruiz R.S., Rhem M.N., Prager T.C. Effects of carbachol and acetylcholine on intraocular pressure after cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989; 107:7-10. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(89)90806-4
16. Lai J.S.M., Chua J.K.H., Loo A. et al. Effect of intracameral acetylcholine on latanoprost in preventing ocular hypertension after phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27:700-705. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00729-x
17. Pape L.G., Balazs E.A. The use of sodium hyaluronate (Healon) in human anterior segment surgery. Ophthalmology. 1980; 87:699-705. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35185-3
18. Instrukciya po primeneniyu medicinskogo izdeliya [Instructions for use of a medical device] viskoprotektor Kohevisk® po TU 32.50.50- 011-64260974-2018. (In Russ.).
19. Instrukciya po primeneniyu medicinskogo izdeliya rastvor oftal'- mologicheskij [Instructions for use of a medical device] viskoelastichnyj Adhevisk® po TU 32.50.50-014-64260974-2018. (In Russ.).
20. Berson F.G., Patterson M.M., Epstein D.L. Obstruction of aqueous outflow by sodium hyaluronate in enucleated human eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983; 95:668-672. doi:10.1016/0002-9394(83)90388-4
21. Passo M.S., Ernest J.T., Goldstick T.K. Hyaluronate increases intraocular pressure when used in cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69:572-575.
22. Poyer J.F., Chan K.Y., Arshinoff S.A. New method to measure the retention of viscoelastic agents on a rabbit corneal endothelial cell line after irrigation and aspiration. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998; 24:84- 90. doi:10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80079-5
23. Katsimpris J.M., Siganos D., Konstas A.G.P. et al. Efficacy of brimonidine 0.2% in controlling acute postoperative intraocular pressure elevation after phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:2288-2294. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.08.029
24. Borazan M., Karalezli A., Akman A. et al. Effect of antiglaucoma agents on postoperative intraocular pressure after cataract surgery with Viscoat. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(11):1941-1945. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.06.046
25. Rodrigues F.W., Silva C.M., Modesto D.C. et al. Intraocular pressure variation by pneumatic tonometer before and after phacoemulsification. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018; 28(4):393-397. doi:10.1177/1120672117746931
Review
For citations:
Loskoutov I.A., Korneeva A.V. The influence of new ophthalmic viscoelastic devices on the level of intraocular pressure after phacoemulsification. National Journal glaucoma. 2020;19(2):31-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.02.04