Results of a multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of therapy with 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.004% travoprost
https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2021.01.04
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the intraocular pressure changes in patients with initial and advanced stages of open-angle glaucoma (POAG) when using the study drug bimatoprost 0.03% and the comparison drug travoprost 0.004%, as well as to assess the effect of these drugs on the ocular surface.
METHODS: The study involved 81 patients (137 eyes), 48 women and 23 men, with a mean age of 63 years. Patients of the first group (36 patients, 69 eyes) received 0.03% bimatoprost for 3 months. Patients of the second group (35 patients, 68 eyes) received 0.004% travoprost for 3 months.
RESULTS: According to tonometry data, a hypotensive effect was observed in both groups. Regardless of the method of tonometry, intraocular pressure was lower in the group of patients receiving 0.03% bimatoprost (p<0.001).
In both groups, the state of the anterior segment of the eye was affected in the form of increased hyperemia and an increase in spot staining of the cornea and conjunctiva with fluorescein according to the Oxford scale. However, there was no significant differences between the action of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.004% travoprost drugs.
CONCLUSION: The hypotensive effect of bimatoprost 0.03% was better than travoprost 0.004%. Both drugs had an effect on the ocular surface. The incidence of adverse events in the group of patients treated with bimatoprost did not exceed similar results for travoprost.
About the Authors
Yu. S. AstakhovRussian Federation
6-8 Lva Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022
A. G. Rukhovets
Russian Federation
6-8 Lva Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022
P. A. Nechiporenko
Russian Federation
6-8 Lva Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022
D. P. Novikov
Russian Federation
38 Mohovaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191028
N. V. Sarantseva
Russian Federation
38 Mohovaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191028
E. S. Kuznetsova
Russian Federation
38 Mohovaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191028
V. S. Petunov
Russian Federation
17 Kosinova St., Saint Petersburg, 198099
M. V. Rybina
Russian Federation
56 Metallistov St., Saint Petersburg, 195176
G. V. Kharlamov
Russian Federation
5-1A Simonova St., Saint Petersburg, 194358
N. O. Koshkina
Russian Federation
3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099
E. V. Meshviliani
Russian Federation
3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099
A. S. Alchinova
Russian Federation
3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099
O. A. Stavitskaya
Russian Federation
3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099
References
1. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Yu.S., Yerichev V.P. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome. [National Guidelines for Glaucoma]. 2015.
2. Astakhov Yu.S., Akopov A.L., Potemkin V.V. Comparative characteristics of modern tonometry methods. Vestn Oftalmol. 2008; 5:11-14.
3. Camras C., Alm A., Watson P. Glaucoma treatment for 1 year with latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, in the USA, Scandinavia and UK. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Annual Meeting: Atlanta; 1995. 89.
4. World Health Organization. Division of Drug Management and Policies. Marketing authorization of pharmaceutical products with special reference to multisource (generic) products: a manual for a drug regulatory authority. World Health Organization. 1999. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/65175
5. Linden C. et al. Prostaglandin analogues in the treatment of glaucoma. Drugs and Aging. 1999; 14:387-398.
6. Schuman J.S. Antiglaucoma medications: a review of safety and tolerability issues related to their use. Clin Ther. 2000; 22:167-208.
7. Eisenberg D.L. et al. A preliminary risk-benefit assessment of latanoprost and unoprostone in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drug Safety. 1999; 20:505-514.
8. Gandolfi S. et al. Three-month comparison of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Advances in Therapy. 2001; 18:110-121.
9. Susanna R. et al. The pros and cons of different prostanoids in the medical management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12:149-156.
Review
For citations:
Astakhov Yu.S., Rukhovets A.G., Nechiporenko P.A., Novikov D.P., Sarantseva N.V., Kuznetsova E.S., Petunov V.S., Rybina M.V., Kharlamov G.V., Koshkina N.O., Meshviliani E.V., Alchinova A.S., Stavitskaya O.A. Results of a multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of therapy with 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.004% travoprost. National Journal glaucoma. 2021;20(1):32-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2021.01.04