Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Results of a multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of therapy with 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.004% travoprost

https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2021.01.04

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the intraocular pressure changes in patients with initial and advanced stages of open-angle glaucoma (POAG) when using the study drug bimatoprost 0.03% and the comparison drug travoprost 0.004%, as well as to assess the effect of these drugs on the ocular surface.
METHODS: The study involved 81 patients (137 eyes), 48 women and 23 men, with a mean age of 63 years. Patients of the first group (36 patients, 69 eyes) received 0.03% bimatoprost for 3 months. Patients of the second group (35 patients, 68 eyes) received 0.004% travoprost for 3 months.
RESULTS: According to tonometry data, a hypotensive effect was observed in both groups. Regardless of the method of tonometry, intraocular pressure was lower in the group of patients receiving 0.03% bimatoprost (p<0.001).
In both groups, the state of the anterior segment of the eye was affected in the form of increased hyperemia and an increase in spot staining of the cornea and conjunctiva with fluorescein according to the Oxford scale. However, there was no significant differences between the action of 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.004% travoprost drugs.
CONCLUSION: The hypotensive effect of bimatoprost 0.03% was better than travoprost 0.004%. Both drugs had an effect on the ocular surface. The incidence of adverse events in the group of patients treated with bimatoprost did not exceed similar results for travoprost.

About the Authors

Yu. S. Astakhov
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

6-8 Lva Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022



A. G. Rukhovets
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

6-8 Lva Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022



P. A. Nechiporenko
Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation

6-8 Lva Tolstogo St., Saint Petersburg, 197022



D. P. Novikov
Ophthalmological Diagnostic Center no. 7
Russian Federation

38 Mohovaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191028



N. V. Sarantseva
Ophthalmological Diagnostic Center no. 7
Russian Federation

38 Mohovaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191028



E. S. Kuznetsova
Ophthalmological Diagnostic Center no. 7
Russian Federation

38 Mohovaya St., Saint Petersburg, 191028



V. S. Petunov
City Policlinic no. 23
Russian Federation

17 Kosinova St., Saint Petersburg, 198099



M. V. Rybina
City Policlinic no. 117
Russian Federation

56 Metallistov St., Saint Petersburg, 195176



G. V. Kharlamov
City Policlinic no. 17
Russian Federation

5-1A Simonova St., Saint Petersburg, 194358



N. O. Koshkina
City Policlinic no. 32
Russian Federation

3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099



E. V. Meshviliani
City Policlinic no. 32
Russian Federation

3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099



A. S. Alchinova
City Policlinic no. 32
Russian Federation

3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099



O. A. Stavitskaya
City Policlinic no. 32
Russian Federation

3 Vyazemskiy Ln., Saint Petersburg, 198099



References

1. Egorov E.A., Astakhov Yu.S., Yerichev V.P. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome. [National Guidelines for Glaucoma]. 2015.

2. Astakhov Yu.S., Akopov A.L., Potemkin V.V. Comparative characteristics of modern tonometry methods. Vestn Oftalmol. 2008; 5:11-14.

3. Camras C., Alm A., Watson P. Glaucoma treatment for 1 year with latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, in the USA, Scandinavia and UK. American Academy of Ophthalmology, Annual Meeting: Atlanta; 1995. 89.

4. World Health Organization. Division of Drug Management and Policies. Marketing authorization of pharmaceutical products with special reference to multisource (generic) products: a manual for a drug regulatory authority. World Health Organization. 1999. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/65175

5. Linden C. et al. Prostaglandin analogues in the treatment of glaucoma. Drugs and Aging. 1999; 14:387-398.

6. Schuman J.S. Antiglaucoma medications: a review of safety and tolerability issues related to their use. Clin Ther. 2000; 22:167-208.

7. Eisenberg D.L. et al. A preliminary risk-benefit assessment of latanoprost and unoprostone in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Drug Safety. 1999; 20:505-514.

8. Gandolfi S. et al. Three-month comparison of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Advances in Therapy. 2001; 18:110-121.

9. Susanna R. et al. The pros and cons of different prostanoids in the medical management of glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12:149-156.


Review

For citations:


Astakhov Yu.S., Rukhovets A.G., Nechiporenko P.A., Novikov D.P., Sarantseva N.V., Kuznetsova E.S., Petunov V.S., Rybina M.V., Kharlamov G.V., Koshkina N.O., Meshviliani E.V., Alchinova A.S., Stavitskaya O.A. Results of a multicenter comparative study of the efficacy and safety of therapy with 0.03% bimatoprost and 0.004% travoprost. National Journal glaucoma. 2021;20(1):32-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2021.01.04

Views: 679


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)