Epidemiological features of glaucoma prevalence among the population of the Russian Federation
https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-3-3-10
Abstract
PURPOSE. To study the epidemiological features of glaucoma prevalence among the population of the Russian Federation and to assess the organization of primary specialized medical care for patients with this pathology.
MATERIALS AND METHODS. The subject of this study was the population of the Russian Federation diagnosed with glaucoma. In order to assess the epidemiological features of glaucoma prevalence and to assess the organization of primary specialized medical care for patients with this pathology, according to the federal statistical reporting forms (Forms No. 12, No. 30), the following indicators were calculated: overall and primary incidence of glaucoma in the general population; proportion of patients with glaucoma who are registered with ophthalmologists; availability of ophthalmologists (individuals) per 100 thousand population; proportion of patients with glaucoma diagnosis established during preventive examinations; total number of registered patients with blindness and visual impairment. Statistical processing of the material involved methods of descriptive statistics; calculation of average and relative values with a preliminary assessment of the distribution of indicators for normality. Spearman rank correlation method was used to determine the correlation between quantitative variables.
RESULTS. The studied data was used to calculate the following average values: total and primary glaucoma incidence among the population of the Russian Federation — 78.2 (55.8–105.3) cases per 100 thousand population; the proportion of patients with dispensary registered glaucoma — 80% (74.4–85.8%). The performed correlation analysis established a moderate direct statistically significant relationship between the indicators of total and primary glaucoma incidence among the population (rank correlation coefficient: r=0.72 at p<0.05). In its turn, the correlation between the indicators of glaucoma incidence among the population and the availability of ophthalmologists for the population has not been established (r=0.14, p>0.05). It was found that the indicators of dispensary observation of glaucoma patients do not depend on the indicators of total glaucoma incidence (r=0.16) and availability of ophthalmologists for the population (r=0.13). There is a weak inverse correlation between the proportion of glaucoma cases detected during preventive examinations and the indicator of primary glaucoma incidence among the population (r=-0.28; p<0.05). Also, the correlation analysis did not establish a relationship between the indicator of total glaucoma incidence among the population and the total number of registered patients with blindness and low vision (r=-0.008).
CONCLUSION. The incidence rate of glaucoma in specific administrative territories should be assessed by comparison with the average values among the whole population, which are represented by the median and quarterly ranges. The incidence rate of glaucoma in the general population is not statistically related to the level of availability of ophthalmologists for the population. The proportion of follow-up observation of glaucoma patients does not depend on the availability of ophthalmologists and the level of glaucoma incidence. The incidence of blindness and low vision does not statistically correlate with the incidence of glaucoma in the population.
About the Authors
A. D. ChuprovRussian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Director
17 Salmyshskaya St., Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460047
A. O. Lositskiy
Russian Federation
Deputy Director for Organizational and Methodological Work
17 Salmyshskaya St., Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460047
V. A. Trubnikov
Russian Federation
Doctor, Methodological Coordinator
17 Salmyshskaya St., Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460047
Т. N. Kazakova
Russian Federation
Specialist
17 Salmyshskaya St., Orenburg, Russian Federation, 460047
References
1. Libman E.S., Shakhova E.V. Blindness and disability due to pathology of the organ of vision in Russia. Vestnik oftal’mologii. 2006; 122(1):35-37. (In Russ.)
2. Nazaryan M.G., Arbukhanova P.M. Modern aspects of disability due to pathology of the organ of vision. Kazan medical journal. 2015. 96(2):224-226. (In Russ.)
3. Badimova A.V. Features of the epidemiology of morbidity and disability in connection with diseases of the organs of vision in Russia and abroad. Nauka molodykh (Eruditio Juvenium). 2020; 8(2):261-268. (In Russ.)
4. Nikiforova E.B. Clinical and epidemiological analysis of eye morbidity, disability and inpatient ophthalmological care for the population of the Samara region for the period 2010-2014. Vestnik OSU. 2015; 187(12):160-166. (In Russ.)
5. Babushkin A.Je., Orenburkina O.I., Matjuhina E.N. et al. Analysis of the prevalence, morbidity and disability due to glaucoma in the Republic of Bashkortostan. Vestnik OSU. 2011; 133(14):45-48. (In Russ.)
6. Kapanova G.Zh., Mukazhanova A., Kalmahanov S.B. Analysis of ophthalmic morbidity and availability of medical staff in the population of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2013-2016. International scientific and practical conference world science. 2018; 3(5):74-76. (In Russ.)
7. Sharafutdinova N.Kh., Salakhov T.E., Latypov A.B., Khalfin R.M., Sharafutdinov M.A. Analysis of the influence of the age structure of the population and the staffing of medical personnel in polyclinics on the incidence rate for the main classes of diseases. The journal of scientific articles Health and education millenium. 2016; 18(2): 459–463. (In Russ.)
8. Nesterov A.P., Alekseev V.N., Alekseev I.B. et al. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo po glaukome dlja praktikujushhih vrachej [Glaucoma National Guidelines for Practitioners (3rd ed., revised and expanded)]. Moscow: GEOTAR – Media; 2015. 457 p. (In Russ.)
9. Alekseev V.N., Aljab'eva Zh.Ju., Amirov A.N. et al. Glaukoma. Nacional'noe rukovodstvo. [Glaucoma National Guidelines]. Moscow: GEOTAR – Media; 2014. 824 p. (In Russ.)
10. Nikiforova E.B. Clinical and epidemiological analysis of the dynamics of eye morbidity and inpatient ophthalmological care for the population of the Samara region for the period 2009-2013. Aspirantskiy vestnik Povolzhiya. 2015; (1-2):84-89. (In Russ.)
11. Galeeva F.S., Gabdrahmanov L.M., Karlova E.V., Nikiforova E.B. Organization of care for patients with glaucoma in the Samara region. Vestnik OSU. 2014; 173(12):95-99. (In Russ.)
12. Popova O.E., Badaev F.I., Jablonskaja L.Ja. The incidence of eye diseases and resource provision of the ophthalmological service in theSverdlovsk region. Vestnik Ivanovskoj medicinskoj akademii. 2014; 19(1):5-8. (In Russ.)
13. Dogadova L.P., Abdullin E.A. Dynamics of ocular morbidity and ophthalmological care for the population of the Primorsky Territory in 2011-2013. Tihookeanskij medicinskij žurnal. 2014; 58(4):5-7. (In Russ.)
14. Neroev V.V., Avdeev R.V., Kiseleva O.A., Bessmertnyj A.M. Selected results of an epidemiological study. Oftalmologičeskie vedomosti. 2014; 7(2):4-8. (In Russ.)
15. Bikbov M.M., Babushkin A.Je., Husnitdinov I.I. et al. Dynamics of epidemiological indicators of glaucoma in the Republic of Bashkortostan for the period 2010–2016. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology. 2018; 18(4):163-167. (In Russ.)
16. Solov'eva L.I., Gavrilova T.V., Sobjanin N.A. Antiglaucoma work in Perm: problems and solutions. Perm Medical Journal. 2018; 35(1): 75-81. (In Russ.)
17. Barbos Ju.A., Cherednichenko N.L., Karpov S.M. Analysis of the incidence of glaucoma in the population of the Stavropol Territory. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2018; 17(3):65-75. (In Russ.)
18. Aznabaev B.M., Zagidullina A.Sh., Rashitova D.R. Analysis of the incidence of glaucoma in the population of the Republic of Bashkortostan. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2017; 16(1):55-63. (In Russ.)
19. Vydrov A.S., Komarovskih E.N., Piskun V.E. Long-term dynamics and mid-term prognosis of the incidence of glaucoma in the Amur region. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2016; 9(2):23-26. (In Russ.)
20. Solov'eva L.I., Sobjanin N.A., Gavrilova T.V. Analysis of the state of clinical examination and epidemiology of glaucoma in the city of Perm for 2010-2015. Otrazhenie. 2016; 3(3):42-46. (In Russ.)
21. Sharafutdinova N.H., Gazizova I.R., Zagidullina A.Sh. The incidence of primary glaucoma in the population of Ufa in 2011-2013. Medicinskij vestnik Bashkortostana. 2014; 9(2):78-81. (In Russ.)
22. Makogon S.I. State and prognosis of the incidence of glaucoma in the adult population of the Altai Territory. Natsional'nyi zhurnal glaucoma. 2014; 13(4):66-71. (In Russ.)
23. Grishhuk A.S., Jur'eva T.N., Shhuko A.G. et al. Estimation of the incidence of glaucoma in the Irkutsk region. Kazan medical journal. 2013; 94(6):885-889. (In Russ.)
24. Komarovskih E.N., Vydrov A.S. The incidence of glaucoma in the population of the Amur region. Glaucoma. 2013; 3(2):83-89. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chuprov A.D., Lositskiy A.O., Trubnikov V.A., Kazakova Т.N. Epidemiological features of glaucoma prevalence among the population of the Russian Federation. National Journal glaucoma. 2021;20(3):3-10. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-3-3-10