Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Clinical and morphological evidence of the effect of preservatives on the eye surface in primary open-angle glaucoma

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare clinical features related to changes in the eye surface caused by long term use of prostaglandin antiglaucoma agents, containing and not containing preservatives, and to perform comparative morphological analysis of the conjunctival biopsies in the study groups. METHODS: The study was performed on 90 patients aged 36 to 89 years (mean age 64.5±11.3 years), including 36 males and 54 females. The first two groups were comprised of the patients with newly diagnosed primary open-angle glaucoma stage 1-3, who were prescribed Taflotan without preservatives produced by «Santen» (tafluprost 0.0015% solution in single use 0.3 ml dripping tubes) (1st group) and 0.005% latanoprost with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride or 0.004% travoprost with 0.015% benzalkonium chloride (2nd group). Mean duration of treatment within the frameworks of the study was 135 days, minimal - 90 days. The control group included patients with age-related cataract of various degree of maturation who did not receive local treatment. In the beginning and the end of the study, all patients underwent assessment of the eye surface condition for Dry Eye Syndrome (DES), including symptom scope according to the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index); assessment of the conjunctival folds degree (LIPCOF); the tear film rapture time (TFRT); the degree of Rose Bengal staining of the eye surface (RB); and Schirmer 1 test. At the end of the study selective biopsies were performed during the surgery. RESULTS: Statistically significant gender differences in DES incidence were revealed: 78% of females (42/54) versus 39% of males (14/36). At the end of the study statistically significant decrease in OSDI score in both groups was revealed, compared to baseline data without differences between the groups, as well as Schirmer 1 test in the second group. Treatment complications (hyperemia, subcompensated intraocular pressure, DES and cataract progression) were noted in 3 eyes in the first group, and 11 eyes in the second group (the difference was statistically significant). Hyperemia was revealed in 6% (2 eyes) and 17% (6 eyes), in the first and second group, respectively. In the second group DES progression was revealed, showing correlation with decreased tear expression during Schirmer 1 test. CONCLUSION: Tafluprost without preservatives is an effective and safe hypotensive agent from the group of prostaglandin analogues. It is better tolerated, causes least complaints during instillation, and less adverse effects in the long term use (hyperemia, advancement of the preexisting Dry Eye Syndrome, etc.) when compared to other medications from the same pharmacologic group containing preservatives, which is confirmed by comparative morphological assessment of conjunctiva biopsies.

About the Authors

V. P. Erichev
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation


K. H. Ambartsumyan
«Qanaqer-Zeytun» Medical Center; Municipal Hospital of Anapa
Russian Federation


A. A. Fedorov
Scientific Research Institute of Eye Diseases of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Либман Е.С. Эпидемиологическая характеристика глаукомы. Глаукома 2009; 1 (приложение): 2-3. [Libman E.S. Epidemiological characteristic of glaucoma. Glaucoma 2009; 1 (Suppl.): 2-3. (In Russ.)].

2. ФГУ «ЦНИИОИЗ» Росздрава. Заболеваемость населения России в 2010 г. Статистические материалы. Часть IV. М. 2011: 46. [FGU «TsNIIOIZ» Roszdrava. The incidence of the population of Russia in 2010. Statistical materials. Part IV. Moscow 2011: 46 p. (In Russ.)].

3. Шмырева В.Ф., Зиангирова Г.Г., Мазурова Ю.В., Петров С.Ю. Клинико-морфологическая характеристика дренажной зоны склеры при глаукоме нормального внутриглазного давления. Вестник офтальмологии 2007; 6:32-35. [Shmyreva V.F., Ziangirova G.G., Mazurova Yu.V., Petrov S.Yu. Clinical and morphological characteristics of the scleral drainage area in normotensive glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol 2007; 6:32-35. (In Russ.)].

4. Шмырева В.Ф., Петров С.Ю., Малинин Д.Е. Значение формы и степени деструкции дренажных путей для прогноза эффективности неперфорирующих антиглаукоматозных операций при первичной открытоугольной глаукоме. Национальный журнал глаукома 2010; 9(3):25-29. [Shmireva V.F., Petrov S.Y., Malinin D.E. The importance of form and destruction degree of the draining tract for the efficiency prognosis of the non-penetrating antiglaucomatous operation in view of the primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2010; 9(3):25-29. (In Russ.)].

5. Bandeen-Roche K., Munoz B., Tielsch J.M., West S.K., Schein O.D. Self-reported assessment of dry eye in a population- based setting. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38:2469-2475.

6. Erb C., Gast U., Schremmer D. German register for glaucoma patients with dry eye. I. Basic outcome with respect to dry eye. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008; 246(11): 1593-1601.

7. Еричев В.П., Туманов В.П., Панюшкина Л.А. Глаукома и нейродегенеративные заболевания 2012; 11(1):62- 68. [Erichev V.P., Tymanov V.P., Panushkina L.A. Filtering bleb classifications. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2012; 11(1):62-68. (In Russ.)].

8. Leung E.W., Medeiros F.A., Weinreb R.N. Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2008; 17(5):350-355.

9. Онищенко А.Л., Лихачева И.Г., Пластинина С.Л., Ткачев В.А. Причины низкой комплаентности больных глаукомой и пути ее коррекции. Глаукома 2009; 4: 39-42. [Onishchenko A.L., Likhacheva I.G., Plastinina S.L., Tkachev V.A. Reasons of poor compliance in glaucoma patients and its correction modalities. Glaucoma 2009; 4:39-42. (In Russ.)].

10. Pisella P.J., Pouliquen P., Baudouin C. Prevalence of ocular symptoms and signs with preserved and preservative free glaucoma medication. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86(4):418-423.

11. Baudouin C., Labte A., Liang H., Pauly A., Brignole-Baudouin F. Preservatives in eyedrops: the good, the bad and the ugly. Prog Retin Eye Res 2010 Jul; 29(4):312-334.

12. Arici M.K., Arici D.S., Topalkara A., Giiler C. Adverse effects of topical antiglaucoma drugs on the ocular surface. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 28(2):113-117.

13. Еричев В.П., Ганковская Л.В., Ковальчук Л.В., Ганков- ская О.А., Дугина А.Е. Интерлейкин-17 и его возможное участие в репаративных процессах при глаукоме. Глаукома 2009; 1:23-26. [Erichev V.P., Gankovskaya L.V., Kovalchuk L.V., Gankovskaya O.A., Dugina A.E. Interleukin-17 and it’s possible role in reparative processes in POAG. Glaucoma 2009; 1:23-26. (In Russ.)].

14. Курышева Н.И., Винецкая М.И., Еричев В.П., Артамонов В.П. О проницаемости барьера кровь-водянистая влага при первичной открытоугольной глаукоме. Вестник офтальмологии 1998; 1:10. [Kurysheva N.I., Vinetskaya M.I., Erichev V.P., Artamonov V.P. About barrier permeability of the blood-aqueous humor in primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol 1998; 1:10. (In Russ.)].

15. Xiong C., Chen D., Liu J., Liu B., Li N., Zhou Y. et al. A rabbit dry eye model induced by topical medication of a preservative benzalkonium chloride. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2008; 49(5): 1850-1856.

16. De Saint Jean M., Brignole F., Bringuier A.F., Bauchet A., Feldmann G., Baudouin C. Effects of benzalkonium chloride on growth and survival of Chang conjunctival cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40(3):619-630.

17. Pisella P.J., Debbasch C., Hamard P., Creuzot-Garcher C., Rat P., Brignole F. et al. Conjunctival proinflammatory and proapoptotic effects of latanoprost and preserved and unpreserved timolol: an ex vivo and in vitro study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45(5):1360-1368.

18. Baun O., Heegaard S., Kessing S.V., Prause J.U. The morphology of conjunctiva after long-term topical anti-glaucoma treatment. A quantitative analysis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995; 73(3):242-245.

19. Петров С.Ю. Классификации фильтрационных подушек. Национальный журнал глаукома 2014; 13(2):85- 98. [Petrov S.Yu. Filtering bleb classifications. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2014; 13(2):85-98. (In Russ.)].

20. Еричев В.П. Дефицит глутатиона при открытоугольной глаукоме и подходы к его коррекции. Вестник офтальмологии 1992; 108(4):13-15. [Erichev V.P. Deficiency of glutathione with open-angle glaucoma and the approaches to its correction. Vestn Oftalmol 1992; 108(4):13-15. (In Russ.)].

21. Еричев В.П., Шамшинова А.М., Ловпаче Дж.Н., Егорова И.В., Коломейцева Е.М. Сравнительная оценка нейропротекторного действия пептидных биорегуляторов у пациентов с различными стадиями первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Глаукома 2005; 1:18. [Erichev V.P., Shamshi- nova A.M., Lovpache J.N., Egorova I.V., Kolomeitseva E.M. Comparative evaluation of the neuroprotective action of peptide bioregulators in patients with different stages of primary open-angle glaucoma. Glaucoma 2005; 1:18. (In Russ.)].

22. Хорошилова-Маслова И.П., Ганковская Л.В., Андреева Л.Д., Еричев В.П., Василенкова Л.В., Илатовская Л.В. Экспериментальное изучение ингибирующего действия комплекса цитокинов на заживление раны после фильтрующей операции при глаукоме. Гистопатологические и иммунохимические находки. Вестник офтальмологии 2000; 116(1):5. [Horoshilova-Maslova I.R., Gankovskaya L.V., Andreeva L.D., Erichev V.P., Vasilenkova L.V., Ilatovskaya L.V. Experimental study of complex inhibitory effect of cytokines on wound healing after the filter operations in glaucoma. Histopathologic and immunohimicheskis find. Vestn Oftalmol 2000; 116(1):5. (In Russ.)].

23. Broadway D.C., Grierson I., O’Brien C., Hitchings R.A. Adverse effects of topical antiglaucoma medication. I. The conjunctival cell profile. Arch Ophthalmol 1994; 112(11): 1437-1445.

24. Авдеев Р.В., Александров А.С., Басинский А.С., Блюм Е.А., Брежнев А.Ю. и др. Клиническое многоцентровое исследование эффективности синусотрабекулэктомии. Национальный журнал глаукома 2013; 12(2):53-60. [Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S., Blyum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu. et al. Clinical multicenter study of trabeculectomy efficacy. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2013; 12(2):53-55. (In Russ.)].

25. Aritiirk N., Oge I., Baris S., Erkan D., , Y., Koc F. The effects of antiglaucomatous agents on conjunctiva used for various durations. Int Ophthalmol 1996-1997; 20(1-3):57-62.

26. Janulevciene I., Dertac I., Grybauskiene L., Paulauskaite R., Gromnickaite R, Kuzmiene L. Effects of preservative-free tafluprost on tear film osmolarity, tolerability, and intraocular pressure in previously treated patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2012; 6:103-109.

27. Алексеев В.Н., Левко М.А., Муса А.М. Сравнение эффективности применения Ксалатана, Траватана и Тафлупроста при лечении первичной глаукомы. KOFT, Нейропротекция в офтальмологии 2008; 9(3): 108-109. [Alexeev V.N., Levko M.A., Al-Gifari Musa A.M. Comparison of effects of Xalatan, Travatan and Tafluprost usage in treatment of primary glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2008; 9 (3): 108-109. (In Russ)].

28. Sanford M. Preservative-free latanoprost eye drops in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma / ocular hypertension. Clin DrugInvestig 2014; 34(7):521-528.


Review

For citations:


Erichev V.P., Ambartsumyan K.H., Fedorov A.A. Clinical and morphological evidence of the effect of preservatives on the eye surface in primary open-angle glaucoma. National Journal glaucoma. 2014;13(4):13-22. (In Russ.)

Views: 719


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)