The profile of childhood glaucoma — results of a 20-year retrospective study
https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-2-71-80
Abstract
In 2013, at the 9th Congress of the World Glaucoma Association, a new classification of childhood glaucoma was adopted.
PURPOSE. This study analyzes the profile of childhood glaucoma in accordance with the new classification and evaluates the convenience of its use in clinical and research work.
METHODS. We reviewed the retrospective data of 652 patients (1000 eyes) aged 0 to 18 years with childhood glaucoma who were under observation between 2002 and 2022. The mean follow-up period was 10.4±0.2 years.
RESULTS. The majority of patients had bilateral glaucoma (53.4%). The most common are bilateral manifestations in primary congenital glaucoma (79.7%), juvenile glaucoma (95.8%), secondary glaucoma associated with nonacquired ocular anomalies (54%). The majority of patients in the study were male (363 patients; 56.7%). The most common diagnoses were secondary glaucoma associated with acquired conditions (42.6%), primary congenital glaucoma was diagnosed in 21% of cases. In the vast majority of cases (from 52% to 85%), the treatment of glaucoma was surgical. The maximum number of repeated hypotensive interventions (2.1 operations per eye) was required for patients with primary congenital glaucoma. The results of surgical treatment of secondary childhood glaucoma turned out to be more optimistic — one operation was enough to control glaucoma in 64.6% (62 eyes out of 96) of operated eyes with glaucoma associated with non-acquired ocular anomalies, in 70.7% of cases (29 eyes out of 41) in glaucoma associated with non-acquired systemic conditions, 66.8% in secondary glaucoma associated with acquired conditions (227 eyes out of 340), and in 68.4% of cases in glaucoma following cataract surgery (39 eyes out of 57). In the course of the observation period, 1239 glaucoma interventions were performed. The intervention of choice in all subgroups was filtering surgery. Cyclodestructive procedures were performed significantly more often (p<0.05) in the group with secondary glaucoma associated with acquired conditions. CONCLUSION. The use of a unified classification system is expected to greatly enhance the understanding of this disease, and consequently improve childhood glaucoma management approaches and standards of clinical care in rare types of this disease.>p<0.05) in the group with secondary glaucoma associated with acquired conditions.
CONCLUSION. The use of a unified classification system is expected to greatly enhance the understanding of this disease, and consequently improve childhood glaucoma management approaches and standards of clinical care in rare types of this disease.
About the Authors
N. N. SadovnikovaRussian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), ophthalmologist, Head of the Ophthalmology Department
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 194100
V. V. Brzheskiy
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Academic Department of Ophthalmology
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 194100
M. A. Zertsalova
Russian Federation
Assistant Professor at the Academic Department of Ophthalmology
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 194100
A. Yu. Baranov
Russian Federation
Assistant Professor at the Academic Department of Ophthalmology
2 Litovskaya St., Saint Petersburg, 194100
References
1. Katargina L.A., Mazanova E.V., Tarasenkov A.O. et al. The federal clinical guidelines on «Diagnostics, medicamentous and surgical treatment of the children presenting with congenital glaucoma». Russian Pediatric Ophthalmology 2016; 11(1):33-51. https://doi.org/10.18821/1993-1859-2016-11-1-33-51
2. Beck A, Chang TC, Freedman S. Section 1: Definition, classification, differential diagnosis. In: Weinreb RN, Grajewski A, Papadopoulos M, Grigg J, Freedman S, editors. World Glaucoma Association Consensus Series-9: Childhood Glaucoma. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2013. pp. 3–10.
3. Thau A., Lloyda M., Freedmanc S., Beckd A. et al. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2018; 29:385-394. http://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000516
4. Lopes N.L., Gracitelli C.P.B., Rolim-de-Moura C. Childhood glaucoma profile in a brazilian tertiary care center using childhood glaucoma research network classification. J Glaucoma 2021; 30:129-133. http://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001712
5. Papadopoulos M., Vanner E.A., Grajewski A.L. International Study of Childhood Glaucoma. Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2020; 3(2):145-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2019.12.007
6. Abdolrahimzadeh S, Fameli V, Mollo R, et al.: Rare diseases leading to childhood glaucoma: epidemiology, pathophysiogenesis, and management. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015:781294. http://doi.org/10.1155/2015/781294
7. Baig N.B., Chan J.J., Ho J.C., Tang G.C. et al. Paediatric glaucoma in Hong Kong: a multicenter retrospective analysis of epidemiology, presentation, clinical interventions, and outcomes. Hong Kong Med J 2021; 27:18-26. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj208833
8. Bouhenni R.A., Ricker I., Hertle R.W. Prevalence and clinical сharacteristics of childhood claucoma at a tertiary care children’s cospital. J Glaucoma 2019; 28:655-659. http://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001259
9. Fang Y, Long Q, Guo W, et al.: Profile of pediatric glaucoma patients in Shanghai Eye, Nose and Throat Hospital. Chin Med J (Engl) 2014; 127(8):1429–1433.
10. Fung D.S., Roensch M.A., Kooner K.S., et al.: Epidemiology and characteristics of childhood glaucoma: results from the Dallas Glaucoma Registry. Clin Ophthalmol 2013; 7:1739-1746. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S45480
11. Hoguet A, Grajewski A, Hodapp E, et al.: A retrospective survey of childhood glaucoma prevalence according to Childhood Glaucoma Research Network classification. Indian J Ophthalmol 2016; 64(2): 118-123. http://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.179716
12. Liu Q., Liu C., Li H., Yang X. Clinical Analysis of Pediatric Glaucoma in Central China. Front Med 9:874369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.874369
13. Mdala S., Zungu T., Manda C., Namate C. ey al. Profile of primary childhood glaucoma at a child eye health tertiary facility in Malawi. BMC Ophthalmology 2022; 22:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-022-02279-0
14. Mokbel T.H., El Hefney E.M., Hagras S.M., et al.: Childhood glaucoma profile in Dakahelia, Egypt: a retrospective study. Int J Ophthalmol 2018; 11(4):674-680. http://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.04.23
15. Ramkrishanan R., Mitra A., Kader M.A.: Surgical and visual outcomes of childhood glaucoma at a tertiary eye care center in South India. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2015; 4(5):250-258. http://doi.org/10.1097/APO.0000000000000126
16. Senthil S.B.S., Ganesh J., Krishnamurthy R., et al.: Profile of childhood glaucoma at a tertiary center in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2019; 67(3):358-365. http://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_786_18
17. Surukrattanaskul. S, Suvannachart P., Chansangpetch S., Manassakorn A. Characteristics and long-term outcomes of childhood glaucoma: a retrospective-cohort study [version 2; peer review: 3 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 10:165. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V3HFNF
18. Tamcelik N, Atalay E, Bolukbasi S, et al.: Demographic features of subjects with congenital glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014; 62(5): 565-569. http://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.04.23
19. Zagora S.L., Funnell C.L., Martin F.J., et al.: Primary congenital glaucoma outcomes: lessons from 23 years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2015; 159(4):788–796. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2015.01.019
20. Lazareva A.K., Kuleshova O.N., Aidagulova S.V., Chernykh V.V. Childhood glaucoma: literature review. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2019; 18(2):102-112. https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2019.02.11
21. Francis J.H., Folberg R., Abramson D.H., Panarelli J.F. Advanced congenital glaucoma with corneal staphyloma Ophthalmology Glaucoma 2022; 5(5):P475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogla.2022.05.007
22. Katargina L.A., Kruglova T.B., Demchenko E.N., Ovchinnikova A.V. On the pathogenesis of secondary glaucoma after congenital cataract extraction. Russian Ophthalmological Journal 2011; 3:47-51. (in Russ)
23. Baily C., O’Keefe M. Paediatric Aphakic Glaucoma. J Clinic Experiment Ophthalmol 2012; 3:203.
24. Freedman S.F., Beck A.D., Nizam A., et al. Glaucoma-Related adverse events at 10 years in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021; 139(2):165-173. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.5664
25. Neustein R.F., Bruce B.B., Beck A.D. Primary congenital glaucoma versus glaucoma Following Congenital Cataract Surgery: comparative clinical features and long-term outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2016; 170:214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.08.012
26. Rabiah P.K. Frequency and predictors of glaucoma after pediatric cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137(1):30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00871-7.
27. Tatham A., Odedra N., Tayebjee S., Anwar S., Woodruff G. The incidence of glaucoma following paediatric cataract surgery: a 20-year retrospective study. Eye 2010; 24:1366-1375.
28. Sadovnikova N.N., Prisich N.V., Brzheskiy V.V., Baranov A.J., Shilov A.I. Glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucoma. Modern technologies in ophthalmology 2019; 3:170-174.
29. Chen A., Yu F., Law S. K., Giaconi J. A., Coleman A. L., Caprioli J. Valved glaucoma drainage devices in pediatric glaucoma. Retrospective long-term outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133(9):1030-1035. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1856
30. Pakravan M., Esfandiari H., Yazdani S., Doozandeh A. et al. Clinical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in pediatric glaucoma. European journal of ophthalmology 2018; 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118761332
31.
Supplementary files
|
1. рис. 3а | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(23KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
2. рис. 3б | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(717KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
3. рис. 3в | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(38KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
4. рис. 3г | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(71KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
5. рис. 3д | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(11KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
6. рис. 3е | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(72KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
7. рис. 3ж | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(32KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
8. рис. 3з | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(1MB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
|
9. рис. 4 | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(172KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Sadovnikova N.N., Brzheskiy V.V., Zertsalova M.A., Baranov A.Yu. The profile of childhood glaucoma — results of a 20-year retrospective study. National Journal glaucoma. 2023;22(2):71-80. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-2-71-80