Corneal endothelium status as a criterion for assessing the safety of the technique in the combined treatment of patients with glaucoma and cataract
https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2026-25-1-40-45
Abstract
PURPOSE. To evaluate corneal endothelial status in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and complicated cataract undergoing combined micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC) and cataract phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation (PE+IOL).
METHODS. This prospective study included 62 patients with stage I–II primary open-angle glaucoma and complicated cataract who underwent surgical treatment. The study group comprised 33 patients who received combined intervention (MP-CPC+PE+IOL), while the control group included 32 patients who only underwent PE+IOL. Corneal endothelial status was assessed using the Tomey EM-3000 specular microscope preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.
RESULTS. In both groups, a moderate decrease in endothelial cell density was observed during the early postoperative period, with the most pronounced reduction at 1 month (up to 11.8%), followed by stabilization. At 12 months, the mean endothelial cell loss was less than 10%, with no statistically significant differences between the groups (p>0.05). Best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly compared with baseline. No progression of glaucomatous damage was detected by perimetry and optical coherence tomography. The incidence of postoperative intraocular pressure elevation was comparable between the groups.
CONCLUSION. The combined use of MP-CPC and PE+IOL demonstrates a satisfactory safety profile and does not exert a significant negative effect on corneal endothelial status compared with isolated phacoemulsification. The obtained results support the feasibility of the combined approach in patients with concomitant ophthalmic pathology.
About the Authors
E. O. KrasnovaRussian Federation
Krasnova E.O., postgraduate student, ophthalmologist
59a Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486
G. V. Sorokoletov
Russian Federation
Sorokoletov G.V., Dr. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Glaucoma Surgery Department
59a Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486
T. V. Sokolovskaya
Russian Federation
Sokolovskaya T.V., Cand. Sci. (Med.), lead researcher at the Glaucoma Surgery Department
59a Beskudnikovsky Blvd., Moscow, 127486
References
1. Tham Y.C., Li X., Wong T.Y., et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2014; 121(11):2081-2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013
2. Alexeev V.N., Zaharova N.S. Comparative evaluation of life quality of patients with POAG after medicamental, laser and surgical treatment. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2008; 4:149-151.
3. Sokolovskaya T.V., Doga A.V., Magaramov D.A., Kochetkova Y.A. YAG laser activation of trabecula in treatment of patients with primary openangle glaucoma. Fyodorov Journal of Ophthalmic Surgery 2014; 1:47-52. https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2014-1-47-52
4. Erichev V.P., Ragozina E.A. Selective laser trabeculoplasty as initial treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2020; 19(1):47-54. https://doi.org/10.25700/NJG.2020.01.07 (In Russ.)
5. Sokolovskaya T.V., Kochetkova Y.A. Selective laser trabeculoplasty: efficiency and prospects in treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma. Practical Medicine 2012; 4:142-146.
6. Tan A.M., Chockalingam M., Aquino M.C., Lim Z.I., See J.L., Chew P.T. Micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for the treatment of glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 45(2):194-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02238.x
7. Sanchez FG, Lerner F, Sampaolesi J, Noecker R, Becerra N, Iribarren G, et al. Efficacy and safety of Micropulse® Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Glaucoma. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2018; 93:573-579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2018.08.003
8. Emanuel M.E., Grover D.S., Fellman R.L., Godfrey D.G., Smith O., Butler M.R. Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation: Initial results in refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2020; 29(1):12-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000715
9. Ioshin I.E., Tolchinskaya A.I., Rakova A.V., Maksimov I.V. Results of micropulse cyclophotocoagulation in patients with early stages of primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2022; 21(4):22-28. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-4-22-28
10. Zaarour K., Abdelmassih Y., Arej N., et al. Outcomes of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in uncontrolled glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2019; 28(3):270-275. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001174
11. Aquino M.C., Barton K., Tan A.M., et al. Micropulse versus continuous wave transscleral cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma: a randomized exploratory study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43(1):40-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.12360
12. Ioshin I.E., Tolchinskaya A.I., Rakova A.V. Experience of using micropulse cyclophotocoagulation in patients with early stages of primary open-angle glaucoma. Aspirantskiy vestnik Povolzhiya 2022; 22(2): 35-39. https://doi.org/10.55531/2072-2354.2022.22.2.35-39
13. Libman E.S. Modern positions of clinical and social ophthalmology. Vestnik oftalmologii 2004; 120(1):10-12.
14. Saheb H., Ahmed I.I. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23(2): 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7
15. Jerndal T., Lundstrom M. Trabeculectomy combined with cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1976; 81(2):227-231. https://doi:10.1016/0002-9394(76)90736-4
16. Ivanov D.I., Nikulin M.E. Trabeculotomy ab interno as a hypotensive component in combined surgery of cataract and glaucoma. Glaucoma 2011; 3:34-39.
17. Kuebler A.G., Priglinger S., Reznicek L. Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation vs selective laser trabeculoplasty: effects on corneal endothelial cells and intraocular pressure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023; 17(1):e1-e5. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1393
18. Garcia A.P., Liedtke F.S. Phacoemulsification associated with loss of endothelial cells in cataract surgery: a systematic review of main surgical techniques. MedNEXT J Med Health Sci 2023; 4(2). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt23215
19. Loskutov I.A., Fedorova A.I. Phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in cases with critically low corneal endothelial cell count. Oftalmologiĉeskie vedomosti 2023; 16(3):63-69. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV567921
20. Guan H., Mick A., Porco T., Dolan B. Preoperative factors associated with IOP reduction after cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci 2013; 90(2): 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0b013e31827ce224
21. Postupaeva N.V., Sorokin E.L., Pashentsev Ya.E. Algorithm for predicting intraocular pressure elevation after phacoemulsification in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2021; 20(4):27-36. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2021-20-4-27-36 (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Krasnova E.O., Sorokoletov G.V., Sokolovskaya T.V. Corneal endothelium status as a criterion for assessing the safety of the technique in the combined treatment of patients with glaucoma and cataract. National Journal glaucoma. 2026;25(1):40-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2026-25-1-40-45
JATS XML

















