Clinical features of the progression of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with a verified family history of the disease (new results)
https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2026-25-2-38-46
Abstract
PURPOSE. To identify clinical and epidemiological features of the course of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients with a verified family history of the disease.
METHODS. This work is part of a multicenter study conducted across six clinical sites in different regions of the Russian Federation. The analysis included data from 134 individuals (134 eyes), of whom 51 (38%) were men and 83 (62%) were women. Group 1 (60 patients, 60 eyes) comprised individuals with sporadic glaucoma, while group 2 (56 patients, 56 eyes) included patients with hereditary glaucoma. The control group consisted of 18 healthy subjects (18 eyes). The mean age of all participants was 68.1 (62.6; 72.4) years. Standard and specialized glaucoma examinations were performed.
RESULTS. The mean age at POAG diagnosis in patients with sporadic glaucoma was 64.5 (59; 67.9) years, whereas in patients with a burdened family history it was 5.9 years younger, amounting to 58.6 (54.6; 61.5) years. Statistically significant differences between groups 1 and 2 were found in the mean thickness of the ganglion cell complex — 26 (24; 28) µm and 25 (22; 27.5) µm, respectively; lamina cribrosa depth — 450.5 (360; 585) µm and 512.5 (437; 631) µm; Bruch’s membrane to inner limiting membrane distance — 198.5 (163.5; 265.5) µm and 155.5 (110; 225.5) µm; and macular retinal thickness — 274.5 (261; 286) µm and 262 (246.5; 273) µm. Patients with a burdened family history were significantly less satisfied with their current condition (63.96 points) compared to the patients with sporadic POAG (83.51 points).
CONCLUSION. Preventive screening in individuals with a burdened family history should be initiated at an earlier age. Optical coherence tomography should be regarded as one of the most sensitive diagnostic tools, particularly at early disease stages. Patients with a hereditary burden should also be advised to seek psychological counseling to improve their psycho-emotional status.
About the Authors
I. A. BulakhRussian Federation
ophthalmologist, Assistant at the Academic Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Ophthalmology
30b Rabfakovskaya St., Ivanovo, 153021
8 Sheremetevskiy Prospekt, Ivanovo, 153012
P. Ch. Zavadski
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), ophthalmologist
1b Varkausa Embarkment, Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia, 185031
A. V. Kuroyedov
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Head of Ophthalmological Сenter
8A Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, 107014
1 Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997
A. V. Seleznev
Russian Federation
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Academic Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Ophthalmology
8 Sheremetevskiy Prospekt, Ivanovo, 153012
References
1. Rosenthal A.R., Perkins E.S. Family studies in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69(9):664-667. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.69.9.664
2. Leske M.C, Connell A.M, Wu S.Y, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma. The Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995; 113(7): 918-924. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070092031
3. Quigley H.A. Chase the family. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006; 124(7):1036- 1037. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.7.1036
4. Rajendrababu S, Gupta N, Vijayakumar B, et al. Screening First Degree Relatives of Persons with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma in India. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2014; 8(3):107-112. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1172
5. O'Brien J.M., Salowe R.J., Fertig R., et al. Family History in the Primary Open-Angle African American Glaucoma Genetics Study Cohort. Am J Ophthalmol 2018; 192:239-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.014
6. Netland P.A., Wiggs J.L., Dreyer E.B. Inheritance of glaucoma and genetic counseling of glaucoma patients. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1993; 33(2):101-120.
7. Shin D.H., Becker B., Kolker A.E. Family history in primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1977; 95(4):598-600.
8. George R, Ve RS, Vijaya L. Glaucoma in India: estimated burden of disease. J Glaucoma 2010; 19(6):391-397. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181c4ac5b
9. Zhang N, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in the last 20 years: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep 2021 ;11(1):13762. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92971-w
10. Ramulu P. Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009; 20(2):92-98. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32832401a9
11. Kuroedov A.V. Pharmacoeconomic approaches to the treatment of patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmic Vedomosti 2010; 1:51-62.
12. Fomin N.E., Kuroyedov A.V. Diagnostics of glaucoma before clinical manifestations. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology 2020; 20(3):152-158. https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-3-152-158.
13. Aspberg J., Heijl A., Bengtsson B. Estimating the Length of the Preclinical Detectable Phase for Open-Angle Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2023; 141(1):48-54. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5056
14. Shalygina E.L., Kuroyedov A.V., Gorodnichy V.V., et al. Clinical features of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with hereditary tainted family history. National Journal glaucoma 2022; 21(2):77-83. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-2-77-83
15. Bulakh I.A., Kuroyedov A.V., Seleznev A.V., et al. Specific features of impaired tolerance to antihypertensive treatment in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and a hereditary history of the disease. National Journal glaucoma 2023; 22(3):98-108. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-3-98-108
16. Bulakh I.A., Zavadski P.Ch., Lanin S.N., et al. Clinical features of the progression of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with a burdened family history. National Journal glaucoma 2023; 22(2):44-54. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2023-22-2-44-54
17. Landers J., Goldberg I., Graham S. Does a family history of glaucoma affect disease severity at the time of diagnosis? J Glaucoma 2003; 12(1):31-35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200302000-00006.
18. Gramer G., Weber B.H., Gramer E. Results of a patient-directed survey on frequency of family history of glaucoma in 2170 patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2014; 55(1):259-264. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-13020
19. Cho J.W., Sung K.R., Lee S., et al. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and macular ganglion cell complex thickness as measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51(12):6401-6407. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.09-5035
20. Kurysheva N.I., Parshunina O.A. Optical coherence tomography in glaucoma optic neuropathy diagnostics. Part 1. National Journal glaucoma. 2016; 15(1):86-96.
21. Pervichnaya otkrytougol'naya glaukoma. Natsional'noe rukovodstvo [Primary ope-angle glaucoma. National guidelines]. Ed. by E.A. Egorov, A.V. Kuroyedov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2023; 1032 p. (In Russ)
Review
For citations:
Bulakh I.A., Zavadski P.Ch., Kuroyedov A.V., Seleznev A.V. Clinical features of the progression of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with a verified family history of the disease (new results). National Journal glaucoma. 2026;25(2):38-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2026-25-2-38-46
JATS XML

















