Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Safety and effectiveness of Kumar’s Schlemm’s canal expander in management of open-angle glaucoma in cataract patients

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of Schlemm's canal expander (SCE) in management of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in cataract patients. METHODS: A total of 9 cases (9 eyes) having visually significant cataract and insufficiently controlled by their current ocular hypotensive medication(s) glaucoma were operated upon. There were 5 cases of pseudoexfoliation syndrome, rigid pupils and weakening of Zinn's ligaments resulting in instability of native lens and requiring implantation of a capsule tension ring (CTR) into the capsular bag to stabilize it. A one-stage combined surgery - phacoemulsification with in-the-bag implantation of a foldable acrylic hydrophilic intraocular lens (IOL) and implantation of SCE in Schlemm's canal (SC) was performed in all cases. A 4-5 mm long SCE made from 0.05mm thick medical grade vanadium stainless steel wire was implanted into the SC lumen by ab externo approach. Primary outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP) change, secondary - number of glaucoma medications pre- and postoperatively and complications. A paired t-test was used for IOP and medication analysis. 25% decrease in IOP or IOP of 18 mm Hg or less without medication was considered a complete success, with medication - partial success. The need for subsequent filtering surgery was qualified as failure. Success was evaluated on the basis of Kaplan-Meier cumulative probability at each follow-up visit. Results were considered statistically significant with p<0.05. Minimum postoperative follow-up was 18 months. RESULTS: Out of 9 operated cases a total of 7 cases (7 eyes) were included for analysis. 1 patient who died of natural causes 3 months after the surgery and another case with incomplete follow up were excluded from the study. Mean preoperative IOP was 26.1+4.6 mm Hg (range: 19.0-30.9; 95% CI 22.7-29.5) and mean number of preoperative medications was 2.1+0.4 (range: 2-3; 95% CI 1.9-2.4). At each follow-up a decrease in mean IOP was observed, resulting in 11.3+3.0 mmHg (range: 7.1-15.3; CI 9.1-13.5) at 18 months (p=0.0000015). This represents a reduction of 56.3+11.6% from the baseline IOP. A reduction in glaucoma medications use was observed at each follow up visit and was 0.9+1.2 (range: 0-3; 95% CI 0.0-1.8) at 18 months (p=0.016). Complete and partial success was observed in 4 and 3 cases at the 18-month point, respectively. Microperforation of the trabecular meshwork (TM) in areas other than the exposed part of SC occurred in 1 case. In 5 cases the device could be pushed into SC completely. In 2 cases one end (0.5 to 1.0 mm in length) of the device was left in the exposed part of SC. No specific complications related to the device were noted. A filtration bleb was noticed in 5 cases on day one, 2 cases at 1 week and 1 case at 1 month. At 3 months and afterwards no filtration bleb was noticed in any of the cases. In 1 case laser capsulotomy for secondary cataract was performed to restore vision. Goniosco-pically the device was in the lumen of the SC in all cases except the case with intra-operative microperforation, where one end of the device was lying in the anterior chamber (AC) without any contact with intraocular structures. CONCLUSION: Eighteen months results of the SCE implantation in surgical management of OAG in cataract patients show significant reduction in IOP from the baseline and in hypotensive medication(s) use.

About the Authors

V. . Kumar
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Skhodnya city Municipal Hospital
Russian Federation


M. . Frolov
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation


G. . Dushina
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Skhodnya city Municipal Hospital
Russian Federation


E. . Bozhok
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia; Skhodnya city Municipal Hospital
Russian Federation


References

1. Friedman D.S., Jampel H.D., Lubomski L.H., Kempen J.H., Quigley H., Congdon N., Levkovitch-Verbin H., Robinson K.A., Bass E.B. Surgical strategies for coexisting glaucoma and cataract: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology 2002; 109(10): 1902-1913. doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01267-8

2. Vass C., Menapace R. Surgical strategies in patients with combined cataract and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15(1): 61-66. doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200402000-00012

3. Verges C., Cazal J., Lavin C. Surgical strategies in patients with cataract and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005; 16(1): 44-52. doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200502000-00008

4. Matsumura M., Mizogouchi, T., Kuroda S., Terauchi H., Nagata M. Intraocular pressure decrease after phacoemulsification-aspiration and intraocular lens implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma eyes. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zaashi 1996; 100: 885-889.

5. Kim D.D., Doyle J.W., Smith M.F. Intraocular pressure reduction following phacoemulsification cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999; 30: 37-40.

6. Mathalone N., Hyams M., Neiman S., Buckman G., Hod Y., Geyer O. Long-term intraocular pressure control after clear cornea phacoemulsification in glaucoma patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 479-483. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.06.046.

7. Shingleton B.J., Pasternack J.J., Hung J.W., O’Donoghue M.W. Three and five year changes in intraocular pressures after clear corneal phacoemulsification inopen angle glaucoma patients, glaucoma suspects, and normal patients. J Glaucoma 2006; 15(6): 494-498. doi.org/10.1097/01.ijg.0000212294.31411.92

8. Poley B.J., Lindstrom R.L., Samuelson T.W. Long-term effects of phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation in nor-motensive and ocular hypertensive eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 735-742. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.045

9. Shingleton B.J., Laul A., Nagao K., Wolff B., O’Donoghue M., Eagan E., Flattem N., Desai-Bartoli S. Effect of phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in eyes with pseudoexfoliation: single-surgeon series. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(11): 1834-1841. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.07.025

10. Shrivastava A., Singh K. The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21(2): 118-122. doi.org/10.1097/icu.0b013e3283360ac3

11. Mansberger S.L., Gordon M.O., Jampel H., Bhorade A., Brandt J.D., Wilson B., Kass M.A. Reduction in intraocular pressure after cataract extraction: the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1826-1831. doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.050

12. Choi D.Y., Suramethakul P., Lindstrom R.L., Singh K. Glaucoma surgery with or without cataract surgery, revolution or evolution. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 1121-1122. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.05.005

13. Augustinus C.J., Zeyen T. The effect of phacoemulsification and combined phaco/glaucoma procedures on the intraocular pressure in open angle glaucoma. A review of literature. Bull Soc Belge ophthalmol 2012; 320: 51-66.

14. Casson R.J., Salmon J.F. Combined surgery in the treatment of patients with cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1854-1863. doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01127-0

15. Rosdahl J.A., Chen T.C. Combined cataract and glaucoma surgeries: traditional and new combinations. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2010; 50: 95-106. doi.org/10.1097/iio.0b013e3181c5563a

16. Poulsen E.J., Allingham R.R. Characteristics and risk factors of infections after glaucoma filtering surgery. J Glaucoma 2000; 9: 438-443. doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200012000-00004

17. DeBry P.W., Perkins T.W., Heatley G., Kaufman P., Brumback L.C. Incidence of late onset bleb-related complications following trabeculectomy with mitomycin. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 297300. doi.org/10.1001/archopht.120.3.297

18. Федоров С.Н., Козлов В.И., Тимошкина Н.Т. и др. Непроникающая глубокая склерэктомия при открытоугольной глаукоме. Офтальмохирургия 1989; 3-4: 52-55. [Fyodorov S.N., Kozlov V.I., Timoshkina N.T. et al. Non penetrating deep sclerectomy in open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery 1989; 3-4: 52-55. (In Russ.)].

19. Николашин С.И., Мачехин В.А. Непроникающая глубокая склерэктомия с дренированием шлеммова канала в лечении первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Офтальмохирургия 2002; 1: 17-20. [Nikolashin S.I., Machekhin V.A. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy with drainage of Schlemm’s canal in treatment of primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery 2002; 1: 17-20. (In Russ.)].

20. Stegmann R., Pienaar A., Miller D. Viscocanalostomy for open-angle glaucoma in black African patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 316-322. doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80078-9

21. Carassa R.G., Bettin P., Fiori M., Brancato R. Viscocanalostomy versus trabeculectomy in white adults affected by open-angle glaucoma. A 2-year randomized, controlled trial. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 882-887. doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(03)00081-2

22. Kobayashi H., Kobayashi K., Okinami S. A comparison of the intraocular pressure-lowering effect and safety of viscocanalostomy and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in bilateral open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 359-366. doi.org/10.1007/s00417-003-0652-6

23. Ferrari E., Bandello F., Roman-Pognuz D., Menchini F. Combined clear corneal phacoemulsification and ab interno trabeculectomy: three-year case series. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(9): 17831788. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.050

24. Lüke C., Dietlein T.S., Lüke M., Konen W., Krieglstein G.K. Phacotrabeculotomy combined with deep sclerectomy, a new technique in combined cataract and glaucoma surgery: complication profile. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007; 85(2): 143-148. doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00785.x

25. Francis B.A., Minckler D., Dustin L., Kawji S., Yeh J., Sit A., Mosaed S., Johnstone M. Trabectome Study Group. Combined cataract extraction and trabeculotomy by the internal approach for coexisting cataract and open-angle glaucoma: initial results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34(7): 1096-1103. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.03.032

26. Lewis R.A., von Wolff K., Tetz M., Koerber N., Kearney J.R., Shingleton B.J., Samuelson T.W. Canaloplasty: circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal using a flexible microcatheter for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma in adults: two-year interim clinical study results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35(5): 814-824. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.010

27. Craven E.R., Katz L.J., Wells J.M., Giamporcaro J.E. iStent Study Group. Cataract surgery with trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma and cataract: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38(8): 1339-1345. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.03.025

28. Tetz M., Koerber N., Shingleton B.J., von Wolff K., Bull H., Samuelson T.W., Lewis R.A. Phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation before, during, or after canaloplasty in eyes with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2015; 24(3): 187-194. doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0b013e318285ff13

29. Введенский А.С., Юсеф С.Н., Шарнина Т.В., Воробьева М.В. Гипотензивная эффективность комбинированного патогенетически ориентированного хирургического лечения катаракты и первичной открытоугольной глаукомы. Вестник офтальмол 2013; 129(6): 19-23. [Vvedenskiǐ A.S., Iusef S.N., Sharnina T.V., Vorob’eva M.V. Hypotensive efficacy of combined pathogenically oriented surgical treatment of cataract and primary open-angle glaucoma. Vestn Oftalmol 2013; 129(6): 19-23 (In Russ.)].

30. MIGS: advances in glaucoma surgery/ edited by Kahook M.Y.; associate editors: Sarwat S., Leonard K. Seibold. USA. SLACK Incorporated 2014. 122 p.

31. Иванов Д.И., Никулин М.Е., Струков В.В. Способ одномоментного хирургического лечения катаракты и глаукомы путем трабекулотомии ab-interno и инструмент для ее выполнения. Патент РФ на изобретение № 2389456. Опубликовано 20.05.2010. Бюлл. 14. [Ivanov D.I., Nikulin M.E., Strukov V.V. Combined surgical treatment of cataract and glaucoma by ab interno trabeculotomy and an instrument for it. Patent of Russian Federation № 2389456. Published on 20.05. 2010. Bull. 14 (In Russ.)].

32. Иванов Д.И. Трабекулотом ирригационный. Патент РФ на полезную модель № 109662. Опубликовано 27.10. 2911. Бюлл. 30. [Ivanov D.I. Irrigating trabeculotome. Patent of Russian Federation № 109662. Published on 27.10.2011. Bull. 30 (In Russ)].

33. Kumar V., Frolov M.A., Bozhok E.V., Dushina G.N., Bezzabotnov A.I. A new stainless steel spiral Schlemm’s canal expander in surgical treatment open-angle glaucoma. Национальный журнал глаукома 2014; 3: 43-51. [Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2014; 3: 43-51]

34. Кумар Винод, Фролов М.А., Маковецкая И.Е., Божок Е.В. Способ окрашивания передней капсулы при узком зрачке. Офтальмология 2012; 9(4): 39-42. [Kumar V., Frolov M.A., Makovetskaya I.E. Bozhok E.V. Method of capsule dyeing in small pupil. Oftal’mologija 2012; 9(4): 39-42. (In Russ.)]

35. Краснов М.М. Микрохирургия глауком. М: 1980. 235-236. [Krasnov M.M. Mikrokhirurgiya glaukom [Microsurgery of glaucoma]. Moscow, 1980: 235-236].

36. McCartney D.L., Memmen J.E., Stark W.J. Quigley H.A., Maumenee A.E., Gottsch J.D., Bernitsky D.A., Wong S.K. The efficacy and safety of combined trabeculectomy, cataract extraction, and intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 1988; 95(6): 754-763. doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(88)33112-x

37. Nakano Y., Araie M., Shirato S. Effect of postoperative subconjunctival 5-fluorouracil injections on the surgical outcome of trabeculectomy in the Japanese. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1989; 227(6): 569-574. doi.org/10.1007/bf02169454

38. Mac I., Soltau J.B. Glaucoma-filtering bleb infections. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2003; 14(2): 91-94. Glaucoma-filtering bleb infections. doi.org/10.1097/00055735-200304000-00007

39. Zahid S., Musch D.C., Niziol L.M., Lichter P.R. Collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study group. risk of endophthalmitis and other long-term complications of trabeculectomy in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study (CIGTS). Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 155(4): 674-680. doi.org/10.1016/j. ajo.2012.10.017

40. Rai P., Kotecha A., Kaltsos K., Ruddle J.B., Murdoch I.E., Bunce C., Barton K. Changing trends in the incidence of bleb-related infection in trabeculectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96(7): 971-975. doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300926

41. Grant W.M. Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucleated human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1963;69: 738-801. doi.org/10.1001/jama.1963.03700240109068

42. Johnson D.H., Johnson M. How does nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery work? Aqueous outflow pathway morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 1676-1680. doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200102000-00011

43. Vandewalle E., Zeyen T., Stalmans I. The iStent trabecular microbypass stent: a case series. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2009; (311): 23-29.

44. Belovay G.W., Naqi A., Chan B.J. et al. Using multiple trabecular micro-bypass stents in cataract patients to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38(11): 1911-1917. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.07.017

45. Tetz M. A novel intracanalicular implant for IOP reduction in patients with POAG: surgical and initial coutcomes from the hYdRUS I study. ESCRS 2011. Free paper. Vienna. http://escrs.org/abstracts/details.asp?confid=6&sessid=186&type=free&paperid=8922. Accessed on 25.12.2014.

46. Samuelson T., Tetz M., Pfeiffer N., Ramirez M., Scharioth G., Vass C. One year results of a nickel-titanium Schlemm’s canal microstent for IOP reduction after cataract surgery in open angle glaucoma. Paper presented at: 117th annual meeting of American Academy of Ophthalmology. November, 2012; Chicago, Il.

47. Tetz M., Pfeiffer N., Ramirez M., Scharioth G., Vass C., Samuel-son T. 12 month results from a prospective, multicenter study of a nickel-titanium Schlemm’s canal microstent for IOP reduction after cataract surgery in open angle glaucoma. Paper presented at: 30th Congress of European Society of cataract and refractive surgery. September 2012, Milan, Italy. http://escrs.org/abstracts/details.asp?confid=9&sessid=350&type=free&paperid=13857. Accessed on 25.12.2014.

48. Klamann M.K., Gonnermann J., Maier A.K., Ruokonen P.C., Torun N., Joussen A.M., Bertelmann E. Combined clear cornea phacoemulsification in the treatment of pseudoexfoliative glaucoma associated with cataract: significance of trabecular aspiration and ab interno trabeculectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2013; 251(9): 2195-2199. doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2408-2

49. Minckler D.S., Baerveldt G., Ramirez A.M., Francis B.A. Clinical Results with the trabectome for treatment of open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(6): 962-967. doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.12.043

50. Nakasato H., Uemoto R., Isozaki M., Meguro A., Kawagoe T., Mizuki N. Trabeculotomy ab interno with internal limiting membrane forceps for open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252(6): 977-982. doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2616-4

51. Girkin C.A., Rhodes L., McGwin G., Marchase N., Cogen M.S. Goniotomy versus circumferential trabeculotomy with an illuminated microcatheter in congenital glaucoma. J AAPOS 2012; 16(5): 424-427. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.05.013

52. Seibold L.K., Soohoo J.R., Ammar D.A., Kahook M.Y. Preclinical investigation of ab interno trabeculectomy using a novel dual-blade device. Am J Ophthalmol 2013; 155(3): 524-529. doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.09.023

53. Redmond S. A new technique for opening the canal of Schlemm. Preliminary report. Brit J Ophthal 1960; 44: 370-373. doi.org/10.1136/bjo.44.6.370

54. Краснов М.М. Синусотомия при глаукоме. Вестн офтальмол 1964; 2: 37-42. [Krasnov M.M. Sinusotomyforglaucoma. Vestnik ofatlmol 1964; 2: 37-42. (In Russ.)].

55. Krasnov M.M. Externalization of Schlemm’s canal (sinusotomy) in glaucoma. Brit J Ophthal 1968; 52: 157-161. doi.org/10.1136/bjo.52.2.157

56. Lewis R.A., von Wolff K., Tetz M., Koerber N., Kearney J.R., Shingleton B.J., Samuelson T.W. Canaloplasty: Three-year results of circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm’s canal using a microcatheter to treat open-angle glaucoma. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37(4): 682-690. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.10.055

57. Ayyala R.S., Chaudhry A.L., Okogbaa C.B., Zurakowski D. Comparison of surgical outcomes between canaloplasty and trabeculectomy at 12 months’ follow-up. Ophthalmology 2011; 118(12): 2427-2433. doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.05.021

58. Grieshaber M.C., Pienaar A., Olivier J., Stegmann R. Canalo-plasty for primary open-angle glaucoma: long-term outcome. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94(11): 1478-1482. doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.163170

59. Johnstone M., Curtis K., Passin D., Huang J., Slabaughet M. New imaging techniques to study transparent tobules (TT) spanning Schlemm’s canal structures subject to disruption by SC surgery. AGS 21st annual meeting 2011, poster abstracts, poster N 32. http://journals.lww.com/glaucomajournal/Documents/AGS_Posters_2011.pdf. Accessed on 25.12.2014.

60. Shingleton B., Tetz M., Korber N. Circumferential viscodilation and tensioning of Schlemm canal (canaloplasty) with temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma and visually significant cataract: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 433-440. doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.11.029


Review

For citations:


Kumar V., Frolov M., Dushina G., Bozhok E. Safety and effectiveness of Kumar’s Schlemm’s canal expander in management of open-angle glaucoma in cataract patients. National Journal glaucoma. 2015;14(2):45-55. (In Russ.)

Views: 710


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)