A new trabeculectomy technique for the treatment of glaucoma

   PURPOSE. To develop a new modified technique of sinus trabeculectomy for the surgical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) aimed at reducing scarring and improving and prolonging the outflow of aqueous humor along newly formed pathways.
   METHODS. In the course of the surgery, superficial and deep scleral flaps were formed. After trabeculectomy, the lateral edges of the deep flap were turned inside out and superimposed on each other, forming a roller with "grooves" on its sides used for the outflow of aque-ous humor. The operation was performed in 52 patients (52 eyes) aged 43 to 84 years old (mean age 63.4 ± 1.49 years). Of these, 39 patients were diagnosed with POAG at advanced and far advanced stages, and 13 patients with POAG and a history of previous laser and surgical interventions. The patients were divided into groups: group 1 (main) — 25 patients (25 eyes) who underwent the modified sinus trabeculectomy involving the formation of grooves for the outflow of aqueous humor, and group 2 (controls) — 27 patients (27 eyes) who underwent standard sinus trabeculectomy. The follow-up lasted up to 24 months. Standard methods of examination were used (visometry, tonometry, computer perimetry, tonography, etc.). Optical coherence tomography of the anterior segment of the eye was performed in the early postoperative period, followed by ultrasound biomicroscopy.
   RESULTS. One month after surgery, the average level of intraocular pressure was comparable and remained low in all groups: 1 — 16.7 ± 0.6 mm Hg, 2 — 17.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg. After one year post surgery, IOP remained normalized in both groups. By 24 months, IOP normalization was preserved in 84 %, and including patients compensated on medication — 96 %. In the control group, the hypotensive success rate was 74 %, and including patients compensated on a medication regimen — 88.8 %.
   CONCLUSION. The newly developed sinus trabeculectomy technique for the surgical treatment of glaucoma achieves a prolonged hypotensive effect.

1. Erichev V. P. The main directions of hypotensive treatment of patients with primary glaucoma. Russian Ophthalmological Journal 2000; 1 (1): 18.

2. Saheb H., Ahmed, I. I. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23 (2): 96-104. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834ff1e7

3. Astakhov Yu. S., Egorov E. A. Surgical treatment of refractory glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2006; 7 (1): 25-7.

4. Astahov Yu. S., Egorov E. A., Astahov S. Yu., Brezel’ Yu. A. Surgical treatment of "refractory" glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2006; 7 (1): 25-27.

5. Cairns J. E. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 66 (4): 673-679.

6. Watson P. G., Barnett F. Effectiveness of trabeculectomy in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 79 (5): 831-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(75)90745-x.

7. Watson P. G. Trabeculectomy: A modified ab externo technique. Ann Ophthalmol 1970; 2: 199-206.

8. Krasnov M. M., Kolesnikova L. N. Trabeculectomy in the system of surgical treatment of glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii 1969; 85 (6): 54-57.

9. Krasnov M. M. Microsurgery of glaucoma. Indications and choice of techniques. Am J Ophthalmol 1969; 67 (6): 857-64.

10. Nesterov A. P., Federova N. V., Batmanov Y. E. Sinus trabeculectomy. Preliminary results of 100 operations. Brit J Ophthalmol 1972; 56 (11): 833-9.

11. Erichev V. P., Bessmertnii A. M., Chervyakov A. Yu. Fully fistulizing surgery as a way to increase the effectiveness of surgical treatment of refractory glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2002; 2: 59.

12. Zhuravleva A. N., Suleiman E. A., Kiseleva O. A. Surgical option for the prevention of scarring during sinustrabeculectomy. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research 2017; 13 (2): 372-5.

13. Egorov E. A. Adverse events of hypotensive glaucoma therapy. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2007; 8 (4): 144.

14. Luchik V. I. Modification of anti-glaucomatous surgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii 1992; 108 (2): 7-9.

15. Lebekhov P. I. A method of surgical treatment of patients with open-angle glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii 1987; 103 (4): 18-21.

16. Artamonov V. P. The effectiveness of subcleral sinusotomy in glaucoma. Vestnik oftal’mologii 1980; 96 (2): 5-8.

17. Babushkin A. E. Modification of a sinusotomy. Vestnik oftal’mologii 1991; 5: 7-9.

18. Erichev V. P. Refractory glaucoma: treatment features. Vestnik oftal’mologii 2000; 116 (5): 8-10.

19. Petrov S. Yu., Volzhanin A. V. Trabeculectomy: history, terminology, technique. Natsional’nyi zhurnal glaukoma 2017; 16 (2): 82-91.

20. Agarwal H. C., Sharma T. K., Sihota R., Gulati V. Cumulative effect of risk factors on short-term surgical success of mitomycin augmented trabeculectomy. J Postgrad Med 2002; 48 (2): 92-96.

21. Brindley G., Shields M. B. Value and limitations of cyclocryotherapy. Graefe’s Arch. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1986; 224 (6): 545-548.

22. Lebedev O. I. The concept of excessive scarring of eye tissues after antiglaucoma surgery. Vestnik oftal’mologii 1993; 109 (1): 36-39.

23. Sung V. C., Butler T. K., Vernon S. A. Non-enhanced trabeculectomy by non-glaucoma specialists: are results related to risk factors for failure? Eye 2001; 15: 45-51.

24. Edmunds B., Thompson J. R., Salmon J. F., Wormald R. P. The National Survey of Trabeculectomy. III. Early and late complications. Eye 2002; 16 (3): 297-303.

25. Zalish M., Oron Y., Geyer O. Outcome of consecutive trabeculectomy. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004; 32 (1): 19-22.