Preview

National Journal glaucoma

Advanced search

Standardization of approaches to repeat glaucoma surgery

https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2026-25-2-18-29

Abstract

Recurrence of sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation occurs in 15% to 35% of cases after glaucoma surgery (GS). The choice of optimal management strategy and timing for repeat GS remains an important and insufficiently studied issue.

PURPOSE. To study the range of opinions and clinical approaches among ophthalmologists in Russia regarding repeat glaucoma surgery in patients with primary openangle glaucoma (POAG).

METHODS. This study consisted of a survey conducted among 606 ophthalmologists from various regions of Russia. Among them, 432 (71%) worked in outpatient clinics, 96 (16%) in hospitals, and 78 (13%) combined both settings. The study used descriptive statistics and comparison of proportions between groups with assessment of statistical significance (p-values).

RESULTS. The vast majority of respondents (77.2% of outpatient physicians and 81.7% of hospital physicians) regularly (weekly, monthly, or quarterly) encounter patients requiring repeat GS.

Significant differences in clinical approaches were identified: 46.9% of hospital surgeons were ready to refer patients for repeat surgery within 1.5 to 6 months, whereas only 33.1% of outpatient physicians supported this strategy (p=0.005). In cases of disease destabilization, 46.9% of hospital physicians favor the "prefer repeat surgery" approach, while outpatient physicians more often (42.1%) opted for "prefer prolonged medical therapy" (p=0.0005). While 98.95% of hospital doctors consider stabilization without therapy as a criterion for complete success of antiglaucoma surgery, 6.2% to 8.9% of physicians from other groups also regarded stabilization with hypotensive medications as a successful outcome.

CONCLUSION. The survey results revealed significant discrepancies between outpatient and hospital ophthalmologists in the management of patients with failed initial GS, particularly regarding the timing of repeat surgery and the choice between surgical and medical strategies. These findings highlight the absence of unified standards and underscore the need for the development of standardized clinical guidelines for managing this complex patient population to improve long-term functional outcomes.

About the Authors

A. V. Kuroyedov
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University ; Mandryka Central Clinical Military Hospital
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Academic Department of Ophthalmology, Head of Ophthalmology Сenter 

1 Ostrovityanov St., Moscow, 117997 

8A Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, 107014 



A. Yu. Brezhnev
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Academic Department of Ophthalmology

3 Karla Marksa St., Kursk, 305041



E. V. Berdnikova
South-Ural State Medical University
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Academic Department of Ophthalmology 

64 Vorovskogo St., Chelyabinsk, 454092 



A. A. Vitkov
Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases
Russian Federation

researcher at the Department of Glaucoma 

11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, 1190214 



D. A. Dorofeev
Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases ; OOO Oftalmika Chelyabinsk
Russian Federation

senior researcher at the Department of Glaucoma, ophthalmologist 

11A Rossolimo St., Moscow, 1190214 

8a MOPRa Sq., Chelyabinsk, 454090 



V. V. Gorodnichii
Mandryka Central Clinical Military Hospital
Russian Federation

ophthalmologist 

8A Bolshaya Olenya St., Moscow, 107014 



E. V. Karlova
Samara Regional Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital named after T.I. Eroshevsky
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Med.), Deputy Chief Physician 

158 Novo-Sadovaya St., Samara, 443068 



References

1. Nesterov A.P. Pathogenesis and problems of pathogenetic treatment of glaucoma. RMJ Clinical Ophthalmology 2003; 4(2):47-48.

2. Tyamaeva L. Effective Diagnosis of Glaucoma: Problems and Solutions. Ophthalmological News 2008; 1(3):91-93.

3. Alekseev I.B., Soshina M.M., Belskaya K.I., Ailarova A.K., Kopchenova Yu.G., Koroleva I.A., Isaev A.R. Evaluation of the Hypertensive Effectiveness of Antiglaucoma Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis. Clinical Ophthalmology 2020; 20(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.32364/2311-7729-2020-20-1-8-14.

4. Dorofeev D.A., Baryshnikova D.A., Kirilik E.V. et al. An effective model of dispensary and dynamic monitoring of patients with glaucoma. National Journal of Glaucoma. 2022; 21(1):71-78. https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2022-21-1-71-78

5. Simakova I.L., Kulikov A.N., Kharakozov A.S. et al. A new approach to the study of the pathogenesis of normal-pressure glaucoma. Izvestiya of the Russian Military Medical Academy 2021; 40(S1-1):149-154.

6. Solodovnikova N.G., Ilyina S.N., Krinets Zh.M., et al. The effectiveness of hypotensive therapy in primary open-angle glaucoma. Actual Problems of Medicine 2015; 7:213-135.

7. Malishevskaya O.I., Knysh O.I., Dolgova I. G., et al. Assessment of the quality of life in patients with glaucoma using various options of hypotensive therapy. Medical Science and Education of the Urals 2011; 12(2(66)):207-209.

8. Sihota R., Angmo D. et al. Evaluating the long-term efficacy of shortduration 0.1 mg/ml and 0.2 mg/ml MMC in primary trabeculectomy for primary adult glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 253(7):1153-1159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-015-3028-9

9. Chuprov A.D., Kuvaitseva Yu.S. Surgical Treatment of a Patient with Advanced Refractory Glaucoma. Bulletin of the Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center 2022; 17(3):128-130. https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2022_17_3_128

10. Smneok A.E., Vasilyev R.A., Karlova E.V. et al. Comparative assessment of early postoperative results of non-penetrating equatorial sclerotomy with organ-preserving techniques in terminal glaucoma. Ophthalmosurgery 2011; 2:34-37.

11. Zakharova I.A., Makhmutov V.Yu., Avdeev R.V., et al. Methods of scarring prevention in surgical treatment of glaucoma. Bulletin of Experimental and Clinical Surgery 2016; 9(1):81-88.

12. Baranov I.Ya., Shiryaev I.V., Perevedentseva L.A. Transcorneal activation of the previous hypotensive surgery zone. Vestnik OUG 2014; 12:38-41.

13. Alekseev V.N., Koroyev O.A., Koroyev A.O. Sequential operations for glaucoma and cataract in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin 2011; 16-19.

14. Cheng J.Wei., Xi G.L., Wei R.L., Cai J.P., Li Y. Efficacy, and tolerability of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery augmented with mitomycin C in treatment of open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2009; 44(1):76-82. https://doi.org/10.3129/i08-165

15. Cheng J.W., Cheng S.W., Cai J.P., Li Y., Wei R.L. Systematic overview of the efficacy of nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery in the treatment of open angle glaucoma. Medical Science Monitor 2011; 17(7):RA155- 163. https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.881840

16. Suominen S., Harju M., Kurvinen L., Vesti E. Deep sclerectomy in normal-tension glaucoma with and without mitomycin-c. Acta Ophthalmologica 2014; 92(7):701-706.

17. Gedde S.J., Feuer W.J., Lim K.S., Barton K., Goyal S., Ahmed I.I.K. et al. Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 3 Years of Follow-up. Ophthalmology 2020; 127(3):333- 345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.002

18. Gedde S.J., Feuer W.J., Shi W., Lim K.S., Barton K., Goyal S. et al. Treatment Outcomes in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study after 1 Year of Follow-up. Ophthalmology 2018; 125(5):650- 663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.003

19. Harju M., Suominen S. et al. Long-term results of deep sclerectomy in normal-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmologica 2018; 96(2): 154-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13529

20. Avdeev R.V., Aleksandrov A.S., Basinsky A.S., Blum E.A., Brezhnev A.Yu., Volkov E.N. et al. Clinical multicenter study of the effectiveness of sinusotrabeculectomy. Glaucoma Journal of the Research Institute of GB RAMS 2013; 2:53-60.


Review

For citations:


Kuroyedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu., Berdnikova E.V., Vitkov A.A., Dorofeev D.A., Gorodnichii V.V., Karlova E.V. Standardization of approaches to repeat glaucoma surgery. National Journal glaucoma. 2026;25(2):18-29. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53432/2078-4104-2026-25-2-18-29

Views: 165

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-4104 (Print)
ISSN 2311-6862 (Online)